Upcoming dates in legal cases

[JmmyW]

Curley, Schultz, and Spanier (Superior Court of PA)
8/11/2015 - Oral arguments scheduled in appeal matter before Superior Court

Paterno vs. NCAA (Judge Leete)
8/17/2015 - Appellants Pepper Hamilton & PSU must file statement of errors
9/9/2015 - Oral arguments (in all outstanding matters)

Sandusky PCRA (Judge Cleland)
9/1/2015 - Commonwealth response due

Alumni Trustees vs. PSU (Judge Howsare)
9/8/2015 - Oral arguments (1st hearing)
9/22/2015 - Briefs due
10/1/2015 - Responses to briefs due

 

[JmmyW]

Curley, Schultz, and Spanier (Superior Court of PA)
8/11/2015 - Oral arguments scheduled in appeal matter before Superior Court

Paterno vs. NCAA (Judge Leete)
8/17/2015 - Appellants Pepper Hamilton & PSU must file statement of errors
9/9/2015 - Oral arguments (in all outstanding matters)

Sandusky PCRA (Judge Cleland)
9/1/2015 - Commonwealth response due

Alumni Trustees vs. PSU (Judge Howsare)
9/8/2015 - Oral arguments (1st hearing)
9/22/2015 - Briefs due
10/1/2015 - Responses to briefs due

-----------------------------------------------------------------
-------- Docket Sheet Access
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Public Web Docket Sheets in PA
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/docketsheets.aspx
Common Pleas
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/CP.aspx
Magisterial District
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/MDJ.aspx
Philadelphia Municipal Court
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/MC.aspx
Appellate Docket Sheets
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/Appellate.aspx
Court of Common Pleas Philadelphia County
http://www.courts.phila.gov/common-pleas/
http://www.courts.phila.gov/howdoi/index.asp?search=3
http://fjdefile.phila.gov/efsfjd/zk...er?uid=CSgWQoqGBIolqsSYDxam&o=LXm7HYj9XxozKg8

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------- Court Cases / Docket Sheets
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Curley, Schultz, and Spanier (Judge Hoover, Dauphin County, Common Pleas)
Curley, Docket: CP-22-CR-3614-2013
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/CPReport.ashx?docketNumber=CP-22-CR-0003614-2013
Schultz, Docket: CP-22-CR-3616-2013
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/CPReport.ashx?docketNumber=CP-22-CR-0003616-2013
Spanier, Docket: CP-22-CR-3615-2013
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/CPReport.ashx?docketNumber=CP-22-CR-0003615-2013

----- Curley, Schultz, and Spanier (Appeals in PA Superior Court)
Curley, Docket: 299 MDA 2015
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=299+MDA+2015
Schultz, Docket: 280 MDA 2015
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=280+MDA+2015
Spanier, Docket: 304 MD 2015
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=304+MDA+2015

Ref: Amicus brief: http://files.ctctcdn.com/887ff164101/171a11e5-ecae-4c57-9e3c-148d2a91f208.pdf

----- Sandusky PCRA (Judge Cleland, Centre County, Common Pleas)
Docket: CP-14-CR-2421-2011
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/CPReport.ashx?docketNumber=CP-14-CR-0002421-2011
Docket: CP-14-CR-2422-2011
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/CPReport.ashx?docketNumber=CP-14-CR-0002422-2011

----- Paterno vs. NCAA (Judge Leete, Centre County, Common Pleas)
Docket: 2013-2082
http://co.centre.pa.us/centreco/media/courtcase_iframe.asp?case=paterno vs ncaa
Paterno vs. NCAA (Appeals in Superior Court)
Docket: 1709 MDA 2014 - PSU Appeal
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=1709+MDA+2014
Docket: 877 MDA 2015 - Pepper Hamilton Appeal
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=877+MDA+2015
Docket: 878 MDA 2015 - PSU Appeal
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=878+MDA+2015

------ Spanier vs. Freeh & PSU (Judge Eby, Centre County, Common Pleas)
Docket: 2013-2707
http://co.centre.pa.us/centreco/media/courtcase_iframe.asp?case=spanier vs freeh
http://freehreport.com

----- Alumni Trustees vs. PSU (Judge Howsare, Centre County, Common Pleas)
Docket: 1593-2015
[NEED TO FIND A LINK]

Ref: scheduling: http://www.centredaily.com/2015/07/21/4844076_judge-sets-schedule-for-hearing.html?rh=1

------ McQueary vs. PSU (Centre County, Common Pleas)
Docket: 2012-1804
http://co.centre.pa.us/centreco/media/courtcase_iframe.asp?case=mcqueary

----- PMA vs. PSU (Judge Glazer, Philadelphia County, Court of Common Pleas)
Case Number: 120104126 (PMA vs. PSU, filed 1/31/2012; see also 1502 EDA 2012 appeal)
http://fjdefile.phila.gov/efsfjd/zk...er?uid=CSgWQoqGBIolqsSYDxam&o=LXm7HYj9XxozKg8
PSU Appeal in Superior Court, ref 120104126
Docket Sheet: 1502 EDA 2012, original filing 2/15/2012, closed 2/7/2014
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=1502+EDA+2012

----- PSU vs. PMA (Judge Glazer, Philadelphia County, Court of Common Pleas)
Case Number: 131103195 (PSU vs. PMA, filed 11/27/2013)
Case Number: 131103197 (PSU vs. PMA, filed 11/27/2013)
http://fjdefile.phila.gov/efsfjd/zk...er?uid=CSgWQoqGBIolqsSYDxam&o=LXm7HYj9XxozKg8

----- Victim 9 vs. PSU & Sandusky (Philadelphia County, Court of Common Pleas)
Case Number: 131102298 (filed 11/21/2013)
Docket Access: http://fjdefile.phila.gov/efsfjd/zk...er?uid=CSgWQoqGBIolqsSYDxam&o=LXm7HYj9XxozKg8
Settled on 4/17/2015
Two prior appeals were withdrawn:
1711 EDA 2014
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=1711+EDA+2014
472 EDA 2014
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=472+EDA+2014

----- Victim 6 vs. PSU & TSM & Sandusky (U.S. District Court for Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
Case Number: 2:13-cv-00336-AB
[NEED TO FIND A LINK]

 

[psudukie]

Well at least stuff is inching forward.

Jimmy are you going to the oral arguments tomorrow?

I wonder which case or combination of cases puts the most truth out there?

 

[anon_is9z1n0h3zblb]

Thanks for posting this. You should ask Tom to pin this.

 

[ralpieE]

The Commonwealth and NCAA will be filling gutchies soon.

 

[Raffycorn]

Good to see some movement. Superior Court argument tomorrow, should expect an opinion sometime in the fall, and potentially an appeal to the Supreme Court to follow - I used to think that Kane couldn't afford to tank this case and have her political career survive, but I think it's possible now that if C/S win at the Superior Court level that Kane won't appeal to the Supreme Court and let the case go; she's essentially a lame duck at this point, so she may as well fulfill a campaign promise. If the Commonwealth prevails, we'll certainly see a Supreme Court appeal.

Has anyone heard anything about Judge Hoover? If his health is such that he can't return to the bench, I can't imagine things would be expediated.

 

[JmmyW]

Well at least stuff is inching forward.

Jimmy are you going to the oral arguments tomorrow?

I wonder which case or combination of cases puts the most truth out there?

Hey Dukie, inching is an appropriate description. Nope, not going to the CSS appeal hearing. I think they they have 2 days allotted so they probably expect to cover a lot. It should be interesting. And I don't care which case(s) brings out the most truth, just that it comes out.

Personally, I'd prefer that Baldwin's GJ testimony not be thrown out just so she eventually has to take the stand (but maybe that'll happen either way). But each of CSS has an amicus brief filed by the PACDL that looks pretty compelling.
http://myemail.constantcontact.com/PACDL-News.html?soid=1104983095176&aid=aAVf-xIMR9s
http://files.ctctcdn.com/887ff164101/171a11e5-ecae-4c57-9e3c-148d2a91f208.pdf

...and Spanier picked up some pretty high profile appelate lawyers from D.C. and the firm's lead appellate guy Jeffrey Wall has quite a bit of experience in front of the U.S. Supreme Court. You can find the entry of the lawyers in Spanier's appelate docket sheet https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=304+MDA+2015
...anyway, looks like the CSS case could drag even longer unless the Baldwin stuff gets thrown out.

Background on Jeffrey Wall
https://www.sullcrom.com/lawyers/JeffreyB-Wall

And he's comfortable enough in court to insult a US Supreme Court Justice
http://abovethelaw.com/2010/03/an-a...th-and-justice-sotomayor-struggles-with-math/
MR. WALL: Justice Stevens, I think what I would say is the bureau has been doing it the same way since 1987. Congress has amended this statute five times in the last 20 years. It has never moved to alter the bureau’s methods.
JUSTICE KENNEDY: But the cumulated –
JUSTICE STEVENS: Probably they didn’t understand it because it’s an awfully hard statute to understand.
MR. WALL: Justice Stevens, with all respect, Justice Breyer got it in the first 5 minutes.

 

[LundyPSU]

Hey Dukie, inching is an appropriate description. Nope, not going to the CSS appeal hearing. I think they they have 2 days allotted so they probably expect to cover a lot. It should be interesting. And I don't care which case(s) brings out the most truth, just that it comes out.

Personally, I'd prefer that Baldwin's GJ testimony not be thrown out just so she eventually has to take the stand (but maybe that'll happen either way). But each of CSS has an amicus brief filed by the PACDL that looks pretty compelling.
http://myemail.constantcontact.com/PACDL-News.html?soid=1104983095176&aid=aAVf-xIMR9s
http://files.ctctcdn.com/887ff164101/171a11e5-ecae-4c57-9e3c-148d2a91f208.pdf

...and Spanier picked up some pretty high profile appelate lawyers from D.C. and the firm's lead appellate guy Jeffrey Wall has quite a bit of experience in front of the U.S. Supreme Court. You can find the entry of the lawyers in Spanier's appelate docket sheet https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=304+MDA+2015
...anyway, looks like the CSS case could drag even longer unless the Baldwin stuff gets thrown out.

Background on Jeffrey Wall
https://www.sullcrom.com/lawyers/JeffreyB-Wall

And he's comfortable enough in court to insult a US Supreme Court Justice
http://abovethelaw.com/2010/03/an-a...th-and-justice-sotomayor-struggles-with-math/
MR. WALL: Justice Stevens, I think what I would say is the bureau has been doing it the same way since 1987. Congress has amended this statute five times in the last 20 years. It has never moved to alter the bureau’s methods.
JUSTICE KENNEDY: But the cumulated –
JUSTICE STEVENS: Probably they didn’t understand it because it’s an awfully hard statute to understand.
MR. WALL: Justice Stevens, with all respect, Justice Breyer got it in the first 5 minutes.

Based on her GJ testimony, it doesn't appear that Ms. Baldwin had anything terribly damning to say. But given the other BS in this whole mess, who knows what kind of sh*t will be cooked up if this gets to trial.

 

[LundyPSU]

Well at least stuff is inching forward.

Jimmy are you going to the oral arguments tomorrow?

I wonder which case or combination of cases puts the most truth out there?

dukie- can you confirm if Baldwin met with Mike before or after his first GJ testimony?

 

[psudukie]

Graham and company do have unlimited resources. I don't know if the cases get dropped if state loses appeal of Baldwin issues..... I don't think cases hinge strictly on her.... That's my opinion. Anyway at least it's movement.

When you getting the area next time let me know.

 

[psudukie]

dukie- can you confirm if Baldwin met with Mike before or after his first GJ testimony?

Never once Lundy other than when mike was put on leave Sunday night after Nebraska game. That was a five minute hr thing for leave.

 

[psudukie]

Is that what you were asking Lundy?

 

[PennSt8er]

JmmyW, as usual, you are an MVP in all of this. Thanks for all of your work. We all owe you a cold one.

 

[ralpieE]

JmmyW, as usual, you are an MVP in all of this. Thanks for all of your work. We all owe you a cold one.

We certainly do. I can't believe the Commonwealth hasn't folded on their C, S & S bullshit already.

 

[BobPSU92]

JmmyW, as usual, you are an MVP in all of this. Thanks for all of your work. We all owe you a cold one.

Agreed.

 

[lubrano]

For those interested, the three cases (C/S/S) are 9th/10th/11th on the docket tomorrow. The court commences at 9 am. Each side is allotted 15 min to make his argument so this will be completed tomorrow.

For those attending, remember the court is in the Capitol Building on the fourth floor.

I'm looking forward to this.

 

[lubrano]

By the way, thanks for posting these links.

 

[JoeBatters1]

Graham and company do have unlimited resources. I don't know if the cases get dropped if state loses appeal of Baldwin issues..... I don't think cases hinge strictly on her.... That's my opinion. Anyway at least it's movement.

When you getting the area next time let me know.

Well if CSS have what amounts to unlimited resources that's a good thing since it will ensure a more even playing field as the government always has unlimited resources.

 

[chrisrn1965]

Has anyone heard anything about Judge Hoover? If his health is such that he can't return to the bench, I can't imagine things would be expediated.[/QUOTE]

Since it moved at a glacial pace under his supervision how could it possibly go any slower?

 

[LundyPSU]

Is that what you were asking Lundy?

Yes, thank you. As for other evidence beyond Baldwin, you may be right. But, we haven't seen anything yet that justify the perjury charges.

 

[Ceasar]

Has anyone heard anything about Judge Hoover? If his health is such that he can't return to the bench, I can't imagine things would be expediated.

Since it moved at a glacial pace under his supervision how could it possibly go any slower?[/QUOTE]
Barring a miraculous recovery Judge Hoover is not expected to return to work. At some point the case would be transferred. That said, for the sake of the Judge and his family let's hope for that recovery.

 

[psudukie]

Maybe jimmy or Lundy can answer this... Was t another judge assigned the case?

 

[Ceasar]

Maybe jimmy or Lundy can answer this... Was t another judge assigned the case?

I do not believe so Dukie. There may have been a hearing for which another Judge was assigned (Judge Cherry, IIRC) but I don't believe that was a permanent assignment of the case.

 

[Raffycorn]

The more I think about this I can't help but believe that the timing of the Kane indictment and resignation is just another way of upsetting the timeline for the case schedule listed above.

Im not a lawyer by any stretch....it's just that over the last few years I have developed an acute sense of smell for rats.

If anything has been upsetting the schedule, it was Kane's firing of the appellate attorney that was going to argue the cases - I don't think Kane's arrest has disrupted the process too much. Kane hasn't resigned, fwiw. The Superior Court has its own schedule, and nobody - prosecution, defense, or appellate court - seems to be in too much of a hurry.

 

[CDW3333]

For those interested, the three cases (C/S/S) are 9th/10th/11th on the docket tomorrow. The court commences at 9 am. Each side is allotted 15 min to make his argument so this will be completed tomorrow.

For those attending, remember the court is in the Capitol Building on the fourth floor.

I'm looking forward to this.

Wouldn't oral argument be behind closed doors since all the briefing was filed under seal (due to GJ matters)? If you're going to have oral argument open to the public, why seal everything?

 

[psudukie]

Again I don't know ... Prayers for judge Hoover either way given your statement about his health

 

[bjf1984]

Maybe jimmy or Lundy can answer this... Was t another judge assigned the case?

How much will they have to pay another Judge to take this case?

 

[CDW3333]

If anything has been upsetting the schedule, it was Kane's firing of the appellate attorney that was going to argue the cases - I don't think Kane's arrest has disrupted the process too much. Kane hasn't resigned, fwiw. The Superior Court has its own schedule, and nobody - prosecution, defense, or appellate court - seems to be in too much of a hurry.

Spanier's lawyer filed a request for stay (i.e. stop everything) which was rejected immediately along with an order that no requests for extensions be filed (appellate courts routinely grant extensions). We could have a decision by the middle of September, which would be very fast, even for an interlocutory appeal.

 

[CDW3333]

Never once Lundy other than when mike was put on leave Sunday night after Nebraska game. That was a five minute hr thing for leave.

Do you know if she tried to get in contact with him?

 

[psudukie]

Not once that I am aware of.... Just the leave meeting after Nebraska game.

 

[JmmyW]

Snipped

Paterno vs. NCAA (Judge Leete)
8/17/2015 - Appellants Pepper Hamilton & PSU must file statement of errors
9/9/2015 - Oral arguments (in all outstanding matters)

Pepper Hamilton & PSU filed the statement of errors today.
http://co.centre.pa.us/centreco/med...ATEMENT OF ERRORS COMPLAINED OF ON APPEAL.pdf

They're still fighting the subpoena the Paterno's served on Pepper Hamilton.

No further comment. But here's an interesting article on ACP issues. From a Pepper Hamilton lawyer. In regards to attempts to assert ACP in a Ken Frazier case. http://www.martindale.com/products-liability-law/article_Pepper-Hamilton-LLP_559318.htm

 

[anon_is9z1n0h3zblb]

Is it normal that the document filed by PH is this short? I expected it to be full of reasons as to why the court was wrong, not just a list of things. Less than 2 pages are anything but headers and peoples names and addresses.

 

[GTACSA]

Is it normal that the document filed by PH is this short? I expected it to be full of reasons as to why the court was wrong, not just a list of things. Less than 2 pages are anything but headers and peoples names and addresses.

That's why it's entitled a "concise statement of errors." It preserves the issues as raised in the statement.

 

[ralpieE]

That's why it's entitled a "concise statement of errors." It preserves the issues as raised in the statement.

PH & Freeh are full of crap.

 

[lionlurker]

Are there 2 BOT-bots on call today, or are they both the same person?

 

[PennSt8er]

Snipped


Pepper Hamilton & PSU filed the statement of errors today.
http://co.centre.pa.us/centreco/media/upload/PATERNO VS NCAA PEPPER HAMILTON LLP CONCISE STATEMENT OF ERRORS COMPLAINED OF ON APPEAL.pdf

They're still fighting the subpoena the Paterno's served on Pepper Hamilton.

No further comment. But here's an interesting article on ACP issues. From a Pepper Hamilton lawyer. In regards to attempts to assert ACP in a Ken Frazier case. http://www.martindale.com/products-liability-law/article_Pepper-Hamilton-LLP_559318.htm

I wonder how "the court" feels about "the court erred" in every decision "the court" has made correctly about the lack of ACP. Bunch of fukktards on Freeh's side of this.

 

[mhentz]

I wonder how "the court" feels about "the court erred" in every decision "the court" has made correctly about the lack of ACP. Bunch of fukktards on Freeh's side of this.

It seems disingenuous in the least. I'm not familiar court cases, and I do imagine this sort o' crap is common, but I wonder just how effective is this sort of thing. How often does the judge respond to this sort of filing by essentially saying, "Derp, boy I really screwed up those rulings. Looks like you guys totally busted me, though." I'd think the general response from the judge would be, "Oh, you think I erred. How about you drop dead." Any lawyers want to straighten me out on this?

 

[step.eng69]

-----------------------------------------------------------------
-------- Docket Sheet Access
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Public Web Docket Sheets in PA
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/docketsheets.aspx
Common Pleas
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/CP.aspx
Magisterial District
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/MDJ.aspx
Philadelphia Municipal Court
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/MC.aspx
Appellate Docket Sheets
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/Appellate.aspx
Court of Common Pleas Philadelphia County
http://www.courts.phila.gov/common-pleas/
http://www.courts.phila.gov/howdoi/index.asp?search=3
http://fjdefile.phila.gov/efsfjd/zk...er?uid=CSgWQoqGBIolqsSYDxam&o=LXm7HYj9XxozKg8

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------- Court Cases / Docket Sheets
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Curley, Schultz, and Spanier (Judge Hoover, Dauphin County, Common Pleas)
Curley, Docket: CP-22-CR-3614-2013
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/CPReport.ashx?docketNumber=CP-22-CR-0003614-2013
Schultz, Docket: CP-22-CR-3616-2013
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/CPReport.ashx?docketNumber=CP-22-CR-0003616-2013
Spanier, Docket: CP-22-CR-3615-2013
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/CPReport.ashx?docketNumber=CP-22-CR-0003615-2013

----- Curley, Schultz, and Spanier (Appeals in PA Superior Court)
Curley, Docket: 299 MDA 2015
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=299+MDA+2015
Schultz, Docket: 280 MDA 2015
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=280+MDA+2015
Spanier, Docket: 304 MD 2015
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=304+MDA+2015

Ref: Amicus brief: http://files.ctctcdn.com/887ff164101/171a11e5-ecae-4c57-9e3c-148d2a91f208.pdf

----- Sandusky PCRA (Judge Cleland, Centre County, Common Pleas)
Docket: CP-14-CR-2421-2011
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/CPReport.ashx?docketNumber=CP-14-CR-0002421-2011
Docket: CP-14-CR-2422-2011
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/CPReport.ashx?docketNumber=CP-14-CR-0002422-2011

----- Paterno vs. NCAA (Judge Leete, Centre County, Common Pleas)
Docket: 2013-2082
http://co.centre.pa.us/centreco/media/courtcase_iframe.asp?case=paterno vs ncaa
Paterno vs. NCAA (Appeals in Superior Court)
Docket: 1709 MDA 2014 - PSU Appeal
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=1709+MDA+2014
Docket: 877 MDA 2015 - Pepper Hamilton Appeal
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=877+MDA+2015
Docket: 878 MDA 2015 - PSU Appeal
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=878+MDA+2015

------ Spanier vs. Freeh & PSU (Judge Eby, Centre County, Common Pleas)
Docket: 2013-2707
http://co.centre.pa.us/centreco/media/courtcase_iframe.asp?case=spanier vs freeh
http://freehreport.com

----- Alumni Trustees vs. PSU (Judge Howsare, Centre County, Common Pleas)
Docket: 1593-2015
[NEED TO FIND A LINK]

Ref: scheduling: http://www.centredaily.com/2015/07/21/4844076_judge-sets-schedule-for-hearing.html?rh=1

------ McQueary vs. PSU (Centre County, Common Pleas)
Docket: 2012-1804
http://co.centre.pa.us/centreco/media/courtcase_iframe.asp?case=mcqueary

----- PMA vs. PSU (Judge Glazer, Philadelphia County, Court of Common Pleas)
Case Number: 120104126 (PMA vs. PSU, filed 1/31/2012; see also 1502 EDA 2012 appeal)
http://fjdefile.phila.gov/efsfjd/zk...er?uid=CSgWQoqGBIolqsSYDxam&o=LXm7HYj9XxozKg8
PSU Appeal in Superior Court, ref 120104126
Docket Sheet: 1502 EDA 2012, original filing 2/15/2012, closed 2/7/2014
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=1502+EDA+2012

----- PSU vs. PMA (Judge Glazer, Philadelphia County, Court of Common Pleas)
Case Number: 131103195 (PSU vs. PMA, filed 11/27/2013)
Case Number: 131103197 (PSU vs. PMA, filed 11/27/2013)
http://fjdefile.phila.gov/efsfjd/zk...er?uid=CSgWQoqGBIolqsSYDxam&o=LXm7HYj9XxozKg8

----- Victim 9 vs. PSU & Sandusky (Philadelphia County, Court of Common Pleas)
Case Number: 131102298 (filed 11/21/2013)
Docket Access: http://fjdefile.phila.gov/efsfjd/zk...er?uid=CSgWQoqGBIolqsSYDxam&o=LXm7HYj9XxozKg8
Settled on 4/17/2015
Two prior appeals were withdrawn:
1711 EDA 2014
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=1711+EDA+2014
472 EDA 2014
https://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/AppellateCourtReport.ashx?docketNumber=472+EDA+2014

----- Victim 6 vs. PSU & TSM & Sandusky (U.S. District Court for Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
Case Number: 2:13-cv-00336-AB
[NEED TO FIND A LINK]

Thank you, this is like solving the Rubik's Cube

 

[Mixolydian]

Are there 2 BOT-bots on call today, or are they both the same person?

Funny that you say that. I wondered for years whether those two are the same person. Hard to believe there'd be two people that obtuse and FOS responding in the same thread.

 

[GTACSA]

It seems disingenuous in the least. I'm not familiar court cases, and I do imagine this sort o' crap is common, but I wonder just how effective is this sort of thing. How often does the judge respond to this sort of filing by essentially saying, "Derp, boy I really screwed up those rulings. Looks like you guys totally busted me, though." I'd think the general response from the judge would be, "Oh, you think I erred. How about you drop dead." Any lawyers want to straighten me out on this?

The phrase "The court erred..." is standard phrasing used in all appeals in conformance with Rule of Appellate Procedure 1925(b).