Here's a link to the article:
USGA’s Mike Davis agrees with Chambers Bay’s critics — to a point
As to Davis' absurd opinion that Chamber's Bay should be given another shot despite the greens being clearly substandard for US Open greens....you've got to be freaking kidding me, give it a rest Mike; you're rationalizations about not having the greens in better condition than that despite having 7 years to prepare are pathetic. The reality is that they should have never selected the course because the course is young and the greens NEVER demonstrated that they have ever or WOULD EVER be up to US Open standards especially in terms of both speed, smoothness and "consistency".
USGA’s Mike Davis agrees with Chambers Bay’s critics — to a point
As to Davis' absurd opinion that Chamber's Bay should be given another shot despite the greens being clearly substandard for US Open greens....you've got to be freaking kidding me, give it a rest Mike; you're rationalizations about not having the greens in better condition than that despite having 7 years to prepare are pathetic. The reality is that they should have never selected the course because the course is young and the greens NEVER demonstrated that they have ever or WOULD EVER be up to US Open standards especially in terms of both speed, smoothness and "consistency".
