Of course it would. It's obvious. That's why democrats don't want it. It's obvious too.
https://www.reviewjournal.com/opini...id-would-increase-election-integrity-3177211/
Right now, Nevadans must show more identification to buy alcohol than to vote. Question 7 would change that.
Question 7 is a constitutional amendment requiring Nevada voters to present identification before casting a ballot.
Valid forms of identification include a Nevada driver’s license or an identification card from Nevada, another state or the federal government. A U.S. passport or military ID would work. A tribal photo identification or university ID would be acceptable. Identification cards that expired within the previous four years would also be permitted. For voters who are 70 or older, the “identification can be expired for any length of time, so long as it is otherwise valid.”
For this reform to become law, state voters must approve it this November and again in 2026.
Many progressives insist that voter ID laws represent a furious right-wing conspiracy to suppress the vote, particularly in minority communities. This is bizarre. ID requirements are ubiquitous throughout society for both government and private transactions. Question 7 includes numerous safeguards — and gives the Legislature plenty of leeway — to ensure everyone has access to an acceptable form of identification.
https://www.reviewjournal.com/opini...id-would-increase-election-integrity-3177211/
Right now, Nevadans must show more identification to buy alcohol than to vote. Question 7 would change that.
Question 7 is a constitutional amendment requiring Nevada voters to present identification before casting a ballot.
Valid forms of identification include a Nevada driver’s license or an identification card from Nevada, another state or the federal government. A U.S. passport or military ID would work. A tribal photo identification or university ID would be acceptable. Identification cards that expired within the previous four years would also be permitted. For voters who are 70 or older, the “identification can be expired for any length of time, so long as it is otherwise valid.”
For this reform to become law, state voters must approve it this November and again in 2026.
Many progressives insist that voter ID laws represent a furious right-wing conspiracy to suppress the vote, particularly in minority communities. This is bizarre. ID requirements are ubiquitous throughout society for both government and private transactions. Question 7 includes numerous safeguards — and gives the Legislature plenty of leeway — to ensure everyone has access to an acceptable form of identification.
