All they are serious about is destroying what made the United States the most desirable nation in the free world.
They are certainly not serious about uniting with deplorables..... lmfao.... So much contempt. So little time....
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaig...not-actually-serious-about-uniting-the-nation
For a party that regularly claims it wants to remove President Trump from office in order to “unite” the country, there was an awful lot of pressure for absolute partisan loyalty on the Democrat debate stage Wednesday night. Senator Kamala Harris, for example, announced her run for president promising to be a president “for all the people” because Americans “have much more in common than what separates us.”
On Wednesday, the aspiring “president for all the people” stood on the debate stage and claimed that one of her rivals, Representative Tulsi Gabbard, is not qualified to be the Democratic nominee because she has appeared on Fox News, the most popular cable channel in America, and has occasionally criticized other Democrats.
It’s somewhat difficult to be the president for “all” the people if you deliberately ignore half the country while insisting on absolute fealty to a party line, but Harris didn’t see the irony. She closed her attack by saying the Democrats need someone who can “bring the Party and the nation together.”
Vanity candidate Andrew Yang has also tried to position himself as “non ideological” and “not left, not right, but forward.” He’s even courted the wrath of the #resistance by saying he doesn’t have a problem with Trump supporters. But on Wednesday, he quipped that if he won, the first thing he would tell Russian President Vladimir Putin would be, “sorry I beat your guy.”
Calling Donald Trump Putin’s “guy” is an insult to the 63 million Americans who sent him to the White House in an Electoral College landslide. It’s quite a stretch to claim that you’re non ideological when you spout hyper-partisan conspiracy theories that were invented by resentful campaign operatives to deflect the blame for their crushing defeat.
Even the “top tier” candidates couldn’t resist disparaging huge portions of the American electorate while trying to tout their ability to unify the country. South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, who has tried to position himself as a moderate perhaps more aggressively than any other candidate, melodramatically claimed he "sometimes feel like a stranger in my own country” because he is gay. That’s certainly the way far-left activists tend to view America, but it’s totally at odds with the country most of us know.
The rhetoric, of course, underscores a darker reality. The Democratic socialist agenda is, with few exceptions, broadly unpopular outside of activist circles.
They are certainly not serious about uniting with deplorables..... lmfao.... So much contempt. So little time....
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaig...not-actually-serious-about-uniting-the-nation
For a party that regularly claims it wants to remove President Trump from office in order to “unite” the country, there was an awful lot of pressure for absolute partisan loyalty on the Democrat debate stage Wednesday night. Senator Kamala Harris, for example, announced her run for president promising to be a president “for all the people” because Americans “have much more in common than what separates us.”
On Wednesday, the aspiring “president for all the people” stood on the debate stage and claimed that one of her rivals, Representative Tulsi Gabbard, is not qualified to be the Democratic nominee because she has appeared on Fox News, the most popular cable channel in America, and has occasionally criticized other Democrats.
It’s somewhat difficult to be the president for “all” the people if you deliberately ignore half the country while insisting on absolute fealty to a party line, but Harris didn’t see the irony. She closed her attack by saying the Democrats need someone who can “bring the Party and the nation together.”
Vanity candidate Andrew Yang has also tried to position himself as “non ideological” and “not left, not right, but forward.” He’s even courted the wrath of the #resistance by saying he doesn’t have a problem with Trump supporters. But on Wednesday, he quipped that if he won, the first thing he would tell Russian President Vladimir Putin would be, “sorry I beat your guy.”
Calling Donald Trump Putin’s “guy” is an insult to the 63 million Americans who sent him to the White House in an Electoral College landslide. It’s quite a stretch to claim that you’re non ideological when you spout hyper-partisan conspiracy theories that were invented by resentful campaign operatives to deflect the blame for their crushing defeat.
Even the “top tier” candidates couldn’t resist disparaging huge portions of the American electorate while trying to tout their ability to unify the country. South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, who has tried to position himself as a moderate perhaps more aggressively than any other candidate, melodramatically claimed he "sometimes feel
The rhetoric, of course, underscores a darker reality. The Democratic socialist agenda is, with few exceptions, broadly unpopular outside of activist circles.
