The concept of "opportunity cost" is clearly lost on NJ.
Wonder if his head will explode? LOL... NJ's thinking is "static"...
The second mistake that technology and robot skeptics make, and this is arguably the bigger one, is that they presume the nature of work is static. They believe that there will be no replacement for work made redundant by progress. No doubt there were carriage drivers in the 19th century seeking abolishment of the car in order to remain employed in the 20th. Future writers will draw a similar analogy with the robot.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/johntamny/2015/03/01/why-robots-will-be-the-biggest-job-creators-in-history/
Wonder if his head will explode? LOL... NJ's thinking is "static"...
The second mistake that technology and robot skeptics make, and this is arguably the bigger one, is that they presume the nature of work is static. They believe that there will be no replacement for work made redundant by progress. No doubt there were carriage drivers in the 19th century seeking abolishment of the car in order to remain employed in the 20th. Future writers will draw a similar analogy with the robot.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/johntamny/2015/03/01/why-robots-will-be-the-biggest-job-creators-in-history/
