Honestly, I'm having a hard time calling this "college football" anymore. It's a sure sign of the times. It truly shows now, more than ever, that it's all about the money.The fact that the World Series this year featured the Dodgers and Yankees was no coincidence. Look at MLB payrolls. In the future, will the top CFB teams be the ones that have a billionaire sugar daddy?
Has been about the money for decades. Only difference is that the players are sharing in the bounty. Good for them.Honestly, I'm having a hard time calling this "college football" anymore. It's a sure sign of the times. It truly shows now, more than ever, that it's all about the money.
Agreed. I would add that the transfer portal has also been responsible for equalizing some of the talent gap. Look at what Indiana has accomplished this year.I wondered about this too. However it seems there is a bit more parity in CFB this season, at least amongst the top 30 or so teams or more. Maybe I'm off on this, but seems like more top teams in close games and more teams in the top 25 with multiple loses. I'm probably more concerned about the lower tier teams that have little to no NIL capacity falling further behind.
In the end, kids want to play, so the talent is going to continue to be dispersed among the blue bloods in a similar fashion. You still only can have eleven starters on offense and defense, and no sugar daddy is going to be able to produce a monopoly on talent because kids don’t want to ride the bench.Agreed. I would add that the transfer portal has also been responsible for equalizing some of the talent gap. Look at what Indiana has accomplished this year.
Agreed. I would add that the transfer portal has also been responsible for equalizing some of the talent gap. Look at what Indiana has accomplished this year.
Of course, I'm not naive and not knocking the players. I just believe it needs to be more regulated, especially regarding the 'free agent' aspect of it. Personally, I think the transfer portal has ruined the sense of true commitment from both the schools and the players. They should just call it semi-pro, not college football.Has been about the money for decades. Only difference is that the players are sharing in the bounty. Good for them.