Indeed. Here is a link from an article in philly.com today. More of the same discouraging theme.Same names swirling in the background
http://www.philly.com/philly/busine...s_Will_this_probe_be_different.html?mobi=true
We can very easily cut & paste the PSUBoT malfeasance into the Hershey Board shenanigans.
Same stink, different sewer.
LINK: The PA AG has tried to fix the Hershey Trust for years. Will this probe be different?
The gist of the article is that the Hershey Trust Board players and their web of cronies have more resources and power than the PA AG who is responsible for the oversight of PA charities.
Ric Fouad, an alumnus who runs Protect the Hershey's Children Inc., which has sought reforms, said that "it's difficult to expect much from the [attorney general] when all their past acts made Hershey worse for needy kids but better for connected insiders. The same pattern will hold now without a fully reconstituted and volunteer board that puts children first. This is not Mark Pacella's fault. It's the fault of his politicized bosses."
Berning, also an alum, likes Pacella, but said "the Attorney General's Office has always been intimidated by wealth and [the trust's] ability to marshal legal resources to fight them. Let's face it. The Attorney General's Office has a budget and limited resources, and they would be up against a charity with seemingly unlimited resources and their biggest fear was a protracted legal battle that they would lose by attrition."
Only the attorney general can see it through, Berning said. And based on the past, he doubts the agency "has the will to call their bluff.
These blackguards are able to protect themselves by use of the very same considerable resources they are accused of plundering. Fungible bounty bestowed upon these swine. They are above the law.
Last edited: