Zach Berger of the CDT with a nice write-up of Bagwell's findings (Re: Corbett/Freeh)
- Thread starter ChiTownLion
- Start date
Cruising Route 66
Well-Known Member
Berger needs to pay attention. This is old news. Frazier quite some time ago gave an account of the selection process which included Corbett's involvement in it.
The village idiot pretends not to notice the forest, while pointing out the trees. Care to opine on the apparent doctoring of emails?
Whenever microdick shows up, it means that he believes that there is a fire that needs to be put out.
Those who have paid attention know that AG Corbett "Tom didn't want to" and slow walked the Sandusky Investigation. Moulton simply did not attribute the delays which were inexplicable, to political motivations. The immaculate email that landed on SPM computer the day after the election served notice that action was necessary. Tommy Boy was now in charge of the candy store and many of The Fools had a sweet tooth. A PSU without GS put a gleam to Tommy's eye. Joe Paterno was quid pro quo in the eyes of a # of Fools. Tommy celebrated and boasted that he told them to do it." Tommy needed to be certain that any investigation would not stray into the OAG malfeasance. So he made a list and checked it twice. The SITF was manned by snakes. The kind that have no conscience when their corporations are responsible for countless deaths...... and work to screw their surviving kin. Of course this is fiction......
How fortunate we are that Louis Freeh, the secular saint, rode his white horse into State College. With his track record in forensics and honesty, there can be no reason to question his "independent" investigation. After all, those document say what the say......or do they?
How fortunate we are that Louis Freeh, the secular saint, rode his white horse into State College. With his track record in forensics and honesty, there can be no reason to question his "independent" investigation. After all, those document say what the say......or do they?
Too bad they didn't pick up on the question of altered emails. This needs press so that someone is forced to investigate it and give a final answer as to altered or not.
It is funny on how the media picks and chooses what to report. This (along with a new revelation of the existence of Curley's notes, a questionable Dunham connection between psu and the Texas based psych group chosen to treat victims, as well as the question of improper billing plans to recoup money from the insurance company) were all raised in the same Bagwell article. All the statecollege.com writer chose to report was Corbetts list for investigators that gave us Freeh.
Last edited:
This is Hillary Clinton-esque: release drips of incriminating evidence over time, calling each one just a little bit worse than the one before, and call it "no big deal." Well, it is a big deal. Now we know that one of the most, potentially, corrupt BOT members (Corbett, the one with the most to lose at the time), not only hand picked Freeh, but picked his competition too. It was kind of like telling the BOT they could choose from the list that included only Charles Manson or John Wayne Gacy.
Regardless of the "drip," we now know that Corbett hand picked the guy that would lead the investigation to back into their previously formed opinion that Joe Paterno was the guy most responsible for the BOT and school administration abdicating their responsibilities. So what did they do, they violated their fiduciary responsibilities to the University to save their own skins.
Some set of friends you have there.
Take it FWIW, but that article is from the Myers' mouthpiece, statecollege.com, and not the CDT. CDT has so far been silent on this issue. Go figure.
Similar threads
