https://www.cnbc.com/2020/06/07/sci...erg-urge-facebook-to-curb-misinformation.html
the question is, who defines incendiary speech? I’m sure they would censor vote by mail dissent, but would permit encouraging looting and rioting. That’s what Twitter does.
- More than 140 scientists signed a letter urging Facebook to curb misinformation and incendiary speech.
- The scientists were currently or previously backed by Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, the research nonprofit backed by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan.
- The letter, shared Saturday, asks Facebook to consider “stricter policies” following the social network’s decision not to take action against a controversial post from President Trump.
the question is, who defines incendiary speech? I’m sure they would censor vote by mail dissent, but would permit encouraging looting and rioting. That’s what Twitter does.
