In between was a flagrant non-call IMO. Kerk got to his feet, they were close to OOB and Parris walked out pulling Kerk with him.He was the first time. He backed up right out of bounds. That's the rule.
The second call was a joke.
In between was a flagrant non-call IMO. Kerk got to his feet, they were close to OOB and Parris walked out pulling Kerk with him.He was the first time. He backed up right out of bounds. That's the rule.
The second call was a joke.
Kerk is a dumb wrestler, nothing new. Just being honest.
I disagree with your take on the Haines call. TD in that position requires control past reaction time. Unfortunately for Robb they clearly were OOB a split second after they hit the mat. Just hitting the mat in that situation does not equal a TD.Do you disagree with any of them? I was at a family function with my girlfriend, so my focus was hit or miss. Iowa has been the beneficiary of good calls too.
Some other that I saw: I thought O'Toole had 2 on the edge in the first on Carr and Carr's 2 in the 3rd was also marginal. The stall call to send it to OT was awful.
Saw an awful call in a PAC 12 match on twitter. Clear takedown in a crab ride on OT. Ref stared at it for 10 seconds and didn't call it.
O'Toole on the edge is a takedown most of the time, agree. Thought it was 2 watching it and still do. Carr's, in real time, did not look like 2. After replay, still could be swayed either way. Didn't see PAC 12s at all, not even sure they happened they are so hidden from the public.Do you disagree with any of them? I was at a family function with my girlfriend, so my focus was hit or miss. Iowa has been the beneficiary of good calls too.
Some other that I saw: I thought O'Toole had 2 on the edge in the first on Carr and Carr's 2 in the 3rd was also marginal. The stall call to send it to OT was awful.
Saw an awful call in a PAC 12 match on twitter. Clear takedown in a crab ride on OT. Ref stared at it for 10 seconds and didn't call it.
said the same in another post. Rock - on the acc - called it out pretty wellI disagree with your take on the Haines call. TD in that position requires control past reaction time. Unfortunately for Robb they clearly were OOB a split second after they hit the mat. Just hitting the mat in that situation does not equal a TD.
If you watched the ACC finals there were 2 or 3 situations that were exactly the same. And all called no TD. One in the AOC-Andonian match and 1 or 2 in the 125 final. You may disagree with the spirit of the rule but it is being interpreted correctly with some level of consistency by the referees which is more than you can say about other rules.
Disagree with this. I did think that was how it was usually called, but I've seen it called 2 all year. It's close enough that I don't think it's a travesty. And plus, Haines then has 4 minutes to get on his offense.I disagree with your take on the Haines call. TD in that position requires control past reaction time. Unfortunately for Robb they clearly were OOB a split second after they hit the mat. Just hitting the mat in that situation does not equal a TD.
If you watched the ACC finals there were 2 or 3 situations that were exactly the same. And all called no TD. One in the AOC-Andonian match and 1 or 2 in the 125 final. You may disagree with the spirit of the rule but it is being interpreted correctly with some level of consistency by the referees which is more than you can say about other rules.
Sorry, replied to the wrong post of yours.
I think the ref was out of position in the O'Toole match and didn't see KOT control the far ankle. That's my only explanation.O'Toole on the edge is a takedown most of the time, agree. Thought it was 2 watching it and still do. Carr's, in real time, did not look like 2. After replay, still could be swayed either way. Didn't see PAC 12s at all, not even sure they happened they are so hidden from the public.
As to the stalls, I have always thought (well, since the RBY Fix fiasco where John Smith begged stall points out of the guy) that stall calls should be more liberally used than not. So none of the stalls bothered me tbh. Problem is it is inconsistent. But let's face it, 3-2 match with a minute left with some of these guys and it might as well be over. Murin stalls at the end of matches up 3-2 but looks active, RBY stalled at the end of his match on bottom, neither got dinged and both should have. I mean, it would take an act of Congress to hit Murin for a stall when he clearly isn't looking to engage in any match he is up 3-2 in after the 3rd period escape.
What would I add that isn't anti-PSU or Pro-Iowa that you missed?
Nagao literally participated in that match the 1st 5 minutes as much as you or I did. If 5 minutes of backing up, non-offensive wrestling is a stall call or 2, no wonder everyone does it.
It's stalling. Just because everyone does it, and some folks do it almost every time they are in that spot, doesn't change that. We are just numb to it is all. SVN doesn't shoot against him, agree. That is stalling too! As an outsider who picked up the sport (the proverbial "Grow the sport" fan), I always wonder why more people don't see that anything to spur more action should be aggressively used. I don't need to see a shot every 10 seconds. But there should be SOME shooting or offensive attempt involved.I think the ref was out of position in the O'Toole match and didn't see KOT control the far ankle. That's my only explanation.
And I agree on the stall calls. I'm just saying calling Murin a "staller" in an ontological sense is ludicrous. He's not the most talented offensive wrestler, but he holds his ground and attacks. He's out attacked SVN by a wide margin and been in on his legs a bunch. I don't understand the hate for him. Did he stall a little late in the match up by 1? Yes, but basically every wrestler does. If you'll recall, he was the one who attacked and got to a leg at the end of the first match when he was already winning.
I guess you didn't watch the match. It's not like it is easy to get out. Kerk worked his tail off to get out both times. Most 285s don't get out.1 takedown then starting down for the 2nd period should not be the match. If it is then he's out of shape. I dont't care if he's a Heavy or not. 1 takedown should not essentially end the match.
This exactly. And yet some keep responding to him....No, he wants attention. Which we're delivering by the truckload.
I guess you didn't watch the match. It's not like it is easy to get out. Kerk worked his tail off to get out both times. Most 285s don't get out.
Your logic, all guys wrestling Starocci are out of shape. And that is more than 100lbs less.
everyone on the team has to wrestle like Star and Levi!all pressure all day!I'll take one true Frosh B1G champ over 2 vets. Super jazzed for Levi. Kerk and Dean need to be much more aggressive in the first period. I don't like their gas tanks late in the match. If you don't shoot you don't win. Overall awesome tourney!!!!
Kerk knows he can't go straight shots has to go angles like last yr,has he forgotten??well he has one more shot hope he wins!That was missing from his arsenal last year and you can tell it's a huge difference this year.
Agree to disagree then. I have seen it called 2 at times - that's kind of a natural reaction - but I also think when it's called incorrectly it is more often reversed than not if reviewed. And, again, I'll point to at least two instances yesterday in the ACC finals where it was called the exact same way. At 157 the officials self-reviewed and reversed the call, at 125 the opposing coaches didn't even throw the brick (either time).Disagree with this. I did think that was how it was usually called, but I've seen it called 2 all year. It's close enough that I don't think it's a travesty. And plus, Haines then has 4 minutes to get on his offense.
Strongly, strongly disagree here. If Kerk goes out and tries to shoot a ton against Parris he’s more likely to end up getting majored.A couple annecdotal observations about Kerk.
Oddly enough it seemed throughout the year Kerk was getting bigger. Every few matches his weight was 1-2 lbs heavier than previous. Even with Cassar when he was undersized he lost a few pounds throughout the season. I am now starting to wonder if this is an indicator of conditioning. Kerk seems gassed late in matches. I hope to see him next year 5-10 lbs lower, I don't see the trade-off as beneficial.
For nationals vs either Parris or Cassi, the 1st period aggressor will win. Parris is one very big, very strong, very solid heavy who gains more confidence reach time out vs Kerk. The match is no longer going to come to Kerk, he needs to have 3-4 totally committed shots in the first period to win. It's pretty clear, he can do it, the question is will he?
A rediculous analogy, but put Nolf or Levi's brain in Kerk's body and he probably majors Parris.
My motto when I was an officer. Not : )
Robb’s left shoelace was CLEARLY in the circle. The refs gifted that match to the F*** State wrestler. Carl must be paying them
I didn't have an issue with the first stall call as that was by definition how it should be called. The 2nd call was awful and I'm glad that Parris won even though I'm a PSU fan. Nobody wants to potentially win that way.He was the first time. He backed up right out of bounds. That's the rule.
The second call was a joke.
And along those lines, he can’t get down early. If he shoots a bunch it plays right into what Parris is best at which is reattacks. Kerk needs to create angles and only take shots that are set up extremely well. If it’s tied going into the 3rd then hopefully Mason takes a shot and Kerk can use his re-attack game which is also his best chance to score. If he takes a bad shot early and gets taken down the match will probably play out the exact same way. Parris is so good, strong, and athletic that he can just defend, hold center, and handfight if he has a lead. Kerk has to find a way to score early so Parris has to come after him. These 2 guys are both incredible and either one winning the next match wouldn’t surprise me. They both seem to have separated from Cass and probably the rest of the heavyweight fieldStrongly, strongly disagree here. If Kerk goes out and tries to shoot a ton against Parris he’s more likely to end up getting majored.
Attacks for the sake of attacks aren’t good. Kerk needs to improve his setups more than anything else. Until he does that, Parris is just going to punish him with reattacks.
Agree with this. Can't remember which year it was but it was early in Sammy's career and I had a conversation with both ma and pa out at night at the hotel in Hershey. Mom absolutely loved tOSU. Dad was a big VT fan because of Robie, but also made a comment that they would have to consider PSU because they were the #1 team in the country in their back yard and the room was so good. At that point, PSU hadn't indicated their interest level, which is typical for PSU as Cael usually waits until later in their HS career. Then the next summer and early the next season Sammy ran into a couple of issues so it is highly likely that PSU still was being very cautious.I personally never heard he said he didn't like Penn State. He really liked Ohio State when he went to camp out there when in high school. I don't blame any kid wanting to go to his choice of schools. I just thought PSU should of made a play for him for his talent. I think his one slip up in high school scared PSU away. Maybe he made the right choice. 5 time AA and academic AA. It's is old news now, I just was defending myself about my concern about Alex offense and someone was sarcastic on me making such a comment about the future. I know I was right about Sasso 5 years ago. Enough said .
Let's go win another NCAA Championship.
BingoAnd along those lines, he can’t get down early. If he shoots a bunch it plays right into what Parris is best at which is reattacks. Kerk needs to create angles and only take shots that are set up extremely well. If it’s tied going into the 3rd then hopefully Mason takes a shot and Kerk can use his re-attack game which is also his best chance to score. If he takes a bad shot early and gets taken down the match will probably play out the exact same way. Parris is so good, strong, and athletic that he can just defend, hold center, and handfight if he has a lead. Kerk has to find a way to score early so Parris has to come after him. These 2 guys are both incredible and either one winning the next match wouldn’t surprise me. They both seem to have separated from Cass and probably the rest of the heavyweight field
You should really rewatch the 285 match. First stall call was Parris bailing OB, called most times. Next calls were because Parris didn't initiate ANY offense move the whole match. First Parris TD was off a Kerk failed shot. Parris looked amazingly similar to Nelson Brands. In the words of Cael Sanderson, " what match were you watching"?What the hell are you talking about? I supported Paris. The calls were absolute nonsense.
Hopefully he doesn’t peak in two weeks.I might be wrong, been known to be, but 576 post not one mention of Angel Rivera screwing up one of our matches. Think that’s gotta be some sort of record!
No, he has an opinion. Just like you.The poster just wants attention.
I don’t think I’m seeing what you’re seeing. Parris didn’t shoot after scoring but why would he. Greg never came a near a leg. Did nothing to earn the second stall.You should really rewatch the 285 match. First stall call was Parris bailing OB, called most times. Next calls were because Parris didn't initiate ANY offense move the whole match. First Parris TD was off a Kerk failed shot. Parris looked amazingly similar to Nelson Brands. In the words of Cael Sanderson, " what match were you watching"?
The hope here is that at Nationals more guys should have the heart to continue wrestling instead of quitting in consolation matches.Abe Assad netted 7.5 team points by winning one contested consi match. Alex Facundo scored only 5.5 while winning 1 championship and 2 consi matches. We need to figure out how to make Alex as efficient as Abe.
"committed shots" is what I said, and if you want I'll add the word 'quality' as well, I agree. Most of his shots against Parris, especially late in the matches have been neither.Strongly, strongly disagree here. If Kerk goes out and tries to shoot a ton against Parris he’s more likely to end up getting majored.
Attacks for the sake of attacks aren’t good. Kerk needs to improve his setups more than anything else. Until he does that, Parris is just going to punish him with reattacks.
If we're going to dive into unrealistic theories: Kerk can take away Parris' favorite fireman's dump by going full RBY vs. DeSanto. Two weeks should be enough to learn how to wrestle with 1 arm behind his back, right?And along those lines, he can’t get down early. If he shoots a bunch it plays right into what Parris is best at which is reattacks. Kerk needs to create angles and only take shots that are set up extremely well. If it’s tied going into the 3rd then hopefully Mason takes a shot and Kerk can use his re-attack game which is also his best chance to score. If he takes a bad shot early and gets taken down the match will probably play out the exact same way. Parris is so good, strong, and athletic that he can just defend, hold center, and handfight if he has a lead. Kerk has to find a way to score early so Parris has to come after him. These 2 guys are both incredible and either one winning the next match wouldn’t surprise me. They both seem to have separated from Cass and probably the rest of the heavyweight field