ADVERTISEMENT

8 PSU receivers likely to play in 2015

tboyer

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2002
10,173
7,619
1
http://www.pennlive.com/pennstatefo...n_state_wants_to_play_eight.html#incart_river

PSU has NEVER had depth like this at receiver. Nothing close.

Most years under Paterno PSU system had one pair of good receivers and very little substituting. Engram and Scott (though JJ was available, they hardly used him). Terry Smith and David Daniels. Ray Roundtree and Eric Hamilton.

Two years they had multiple receivers -- 2005 and 1982. 82 of course was Jackson, Garrity, McCloskey, Baugh -- that was a TOUGH group to defend. and 2005 was Butler/Williams/Norwood but also Kilmer and Terrell Golden.

I think maybe the 2005 group might be comparable in the sense that 2005 was DESIGNED to use lots of receivers situationally. What 2005 didn't have was people like Godwin and Blacknall -- big, strong, fast guys with good skills (Kilmer was the closest thing but he was still developing as a receiver).

This year, like 2005, they will be able to use their depth as a weapon. They will be able to run Polk in to test how fast someone's corners are, then they'll be able to send in Blacknall or Juwan Johnson the very next play and play jump ball with the same corners.

They can establish patterns where certain receivers play certain situations -- and then by mid-season when those patterns have been picked by opposing defenses, they can start to mix up the receivers and situations and really confuse people.

Anyway, it will be fun to see who among these 8 turns into a big star. I would bet on Godwin. He looked like a man among boys at times last year -- he's really physical and has great coordination and body control. We got a taste of what he can do at the bowl game, and I would guess we will find out a lot more this year.
 
http://www.pennlive.com/pennstatefo...n_state_wants_to_play_eight.html#incart_river

PSU has NEVER had depth like this at receiver. Nothing close.

Most years under Paterno PSU system had one pair of good receivers and very little substituting. Engram and Scott (though JJ was available, they hardly used him). Terry Smith and David Daniels. Ray Roundtree and Eric Hamilton.

Two years they had multiple receivers -- 2005 and 1982. 82 of course was Jackson, Garrity, McCloskey, Baugh -- that was a TOUGH group to defend. and 2005 was Butler/Williams/Norwood but also Kilmer and Terrell Golden.

I think maybe the 2005 group might be comparable in the sense that 2005 was DESIGNED to use lots of receivers situationally. What 2005 didn't have was people like Godwin and Blacknall -- big, strong, fast guys with good skills (Kilmer was the closest thing but he was still developing as a receiver).

This year, like 2005, they will be able to use their depth as a weapon. They will be able to run Polk in to test how fast someone's corners are, then they'll be able to send in Blacknall or Juwan Johnson the very next play and play jump ball with the same corners.

They can establish patterns where certain receivers play certain situations -- and then by mid-season when those patterns have been picked by opposing defenses, they can start to mix up the receivers and situations and really confuse people.

Anyway, it will be fun to see who among these 8 turns into a big star. I would bet on Godwin. He looked like a man among boys at times last year -- he's really physical and has great coordination and body control. We got a taste of what he can do at the bowl game, and I would guess we will find out a lot more this year.

Juwon Johnson is the guy I think. Megatron Jr.....
 
I wonder if there is such a thing as using too many receivers? Does it make it that much harder for Hack to develop timing and rhythm with them?
 
  • Like
Reactions: simons96
  1. Hamilton JR/SO 6-1/206
  2. Lewis JR/SO 6-1/206
  3. Godwin SO/SO 6-1/208
  4. Blacknall SO/SO 6-3/211
  5. Thompkins SO/FR 5-11/185
  6. Johnson FR/FR 6-4/213
  7. Polk FR/FR 5-9/163
  8. Zanellato GS/SR 6-3/210
With Charles, FR/FR 6-4/213, likely redshirting. Really no use in playing him this year unless there are multiple injuries to the bigger guys above.

A walk on that had been on the roster the last few years, and I though had looked talented from what I saw in the B/W games, was Baker. But he's not on the current roster.
 
I wonder if there is such a thing as using too many receivers? Does it make it that much harder for Hack to develop timing and rhythm with them?

They've got rhythm...
They've got a QB

We've got 8 WIde Guys...
Who could ask for anything more?

Old man trouble, we don't mind him
You won't find him 'round our door

They've got rhythm...
They've got a QB

We've got 8 WIde Guys...
Who could ask for anything more?

Who could ask for anything more?



- With apologies to George Gershwin
 
Love hearing Franklin's comments about Polk. The way Franklin described him he is even another gear more explosive than Thompkins who is also supposed to be a burner. Can't wait to see these guys on the field.
 
http://www.pennlive.com/pennstatefo...n_state_wants_to_play_eight.html#incart_river

PSU has NEVER had depth like this at receiver. Nothing close.

Most years under Paterno PSU system had one pair of good receivers and very little substituting. Engram and Scott (though JJ was available, they hardly used him). Terry Smith and David Daniels. Ray Roundtree and Eric Hamilton.

Two years they had multiple receivers -- 2005 and 1982. 82 of course was Jackson, Garrity, McCloskey, Baugh -- that was a TOUGH group to defend. and 2005 was Butler/Williams/Norwood but also Kilmer and Terrell Golden.

I think maybe the 2005 group might be comparable in the sense that 2005 was DESIGNED to use lots of receivers situationally. What 2005 didn't have was people like Godwin and Blacknall -- big, strong, fast guys with good skills (Kilmer was the closest thing but he was still developing as a receiver).

This year, like 2005, they will be able to use their depth as a weapon. They will be able to run Polk in to test how fast someone's corners are, then they'll be able to send in Blacknall or Juwan Johnson the very next play and play jump ball with the same corners.

They can establish patterns where certain receivers play certain situations -- and then by mid-season when those patterns have been picked by opposing defenses, they can start to mix up the receivers and situations and really confuse people.

Anyway, it will be fun to see who among these 8 turns into a big star. I would bet on Godwin. He looked like a man among boys at times last year -- he's really physical and has great coordination and body control. We got a taste of what he can do at the bowl game, and I would guess we will find out a lot more this year.
I love this optimism and hope you are right! You haven't even counted the great TE's available to Hack. My only concern is still over the OL. How improved will they really be? If not very, then this all is in vain!
 
Franklin and staff had a bunch of DBs get drafted out of Vanderbilt when he built up the secondary......Vandy never had close to the offensive fire power that PSU will have for the next few years.........on offense we need the OL and we need place kicking to be good. On defense the first team looks very strong and the back ups look good in the secondary and ok on the dline....we seem still a little short handed in LBs.
 
I wonder if there is such a thing as using too many receivers? Does it make it that much harder for Hack to develop timing and rhythm with them?

it is amazing to me to look up Hack's stats from last year and see he was sacked 44 times and STILL threw for almost 3000 yds.

AND he lost one of the best receivers to come out of the Big Ten (A Rob)

clearly he favored Hamilton last year, I see no change in DHam being his prime target. Thompkins will likely be the benefactor this year of any harder coverage on Hamilton

but Lewis and Godwin got in the mix last year, and Brenneman is back . . . Hack seems to have that Manning-eqsue eye for multiple options when he isn't on his back

I do not expect 44 sacks this year. I expect great things from Hack. and I expect multiple WR/TE receptions being in 20+ receptions category this year

I also think the improved line will break things open for Lynch, and that will be the balance they need to keep the opponent's D "honest"
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT