Agree . But a small program only needs 1 rich guy to become competitive. Now most have no chance at all. Name, Image and Likeness 😂🤣This is wild.
The haves are going to be much more havey.
Ncaa going full pro at this point.
The only organization more f’ed up than the NCAA is the federal government. If you want something to go from bad to worse, insert fed gov.
Some significant changes being discussed.
Read the entire article. (Note, article is free but counts against Sports Illustrated's free article limit for non-subscribers.)
It is still going to be subject to title 9. If you want to increase your wrestling scholarships to 20, you will have to increase women's scholarships by an equivalent amount. (Hopefully be creating a women's team.)It's hard to say where this will be good for the sport. If this happens, the top teams will be able to stack talent more than ever.
Agreed, though IMO the greatest risk to equivalency sports like wrestling isn't lifting the scholarship cap.It is still going to be subject to title 9. If you want to increase your wrestling scholarships to 20, you will have to increase women's scholarships by an equivalent amount. (Hopefully be creating a women's team.)
If you "clear/delete history" including "all cookies" article limits get reset. Downside is that most of your saved passwords will also be deleted.Some significant changes being discussed.
Read the entire article. (Note, article is free but counts against Sports Illustrated's free article limit for non-subscribers.)
i can agree with that. But in reality, if you look at the composition of the football staffs now, they aren't far from that number. "Quality Control", "Offensive consultants", etc. are frequently used job descriptions that aren't on the official books as coaches-but if you go to watch a practice, you can't hardly stir them with a stick.Agreed, though IMO the greatest risk to equivalency sports like wrestling isn't lifting the scholarship cap.
It's when each Power 5 school hires 37 assistant football coaches. That money has to come from somewhere.
I want the guys job that pulls the coach by the belt back to the sideline.i can agree with that. But in reality, if you look at the composition of the football staffs now, they aren't far from that number. "Quality Control", "Offensive consultants", etc. are frequently used job descriptions that aren't on the official books as coaches-but if you go to watch a practice, you can't hardly stir them with a stick.
An example-Gary Patterson from TCU is now a "special assistant to the head coach" at Texas. But, if you look at their coaching staff list, he is not on there. You can currently have 11 "coaches"-but I bet you are at 25 when you include all the other titles.
Kind of like RTC athletes?
the "get back guy", as we call him, is usually one of the strength and conditioning guys. Give the HC a big enough wedgie, might be soon unemployed!I want the guys job that pulls the coach by the belt back to the sideline.
Fed gov who is primary reason for costs being out of control implements plan that doesn’t save cost, just shifts burden under the guise of “helping”. Five years from implementation it will be “why just athletes?” And so it goes with no actual attempt to control tuition, but rather socialize the cost.This is a good thing for the student athletes. Cost of tuition is completely out of control.
Let’s not get that convo going. I agree, but let’s not do that here lol.Fed gov who is primary reason for costs being out of control implements plan that doesn’t save cost, just shifts burden under the guise of “helping”. Five years from implementation it will be “why just athletes?” And so it goes with no actual attempt to control tuition, but rather socialize the cost.
i thought you operated under the 9.9, just paid the rest with other funds?Oh no we're screwed, allegedly we're the only school that doesn't operate within the 9.9 right now.
Let’s not get that convo going. I agree, but let’s not do that here lol.
You say they will stack talent, but you how many guys are leaving now, because they cannot start. Beard is a good example. The good teams may get more talented guys out of the gate, but they won't be keeping them if they are a back up.It's hard to say where this will be good for the sport. If this happens, the top teams will be able to stack talent more than ever.
You are right. I used to have a next door neighbor who was Coordinator at a power 5 team. He used the Pat Kirwin book “Don’t look at the ball” to teach me how to spot offensive lineman “tells”. Then he would turn me loose with one of his PC’s and opponent game film. My unpaid “quality control” job was to feed the “tells” to a paid contact on the staff. In return, I got to attend practices and sit in the press box once per year. This sort of thing is only for retired football nut cases, it supports the thought that Power 5 programs utilize far more employees (unpaid) than advertised.i can agree with that. But in reality, if you look at the composition of the football staffs now, they aren't far from that number. "Quality Control", "Offensive consultants", etc. are frequently used job descriptions that aren't on the official books as coaches-but if you go to watch a practice, you can't hardly stir them with a stick.
An example-Gary Patterson from TCU is now a "special assistant to the head coach" at Texas. But, if you look at their coaching staff list, he is not on there. You can currently have 11 "coaches"-but I bet you are at 25 when you include all the other titles.
Kind of like RTC athletes?
All teams have contractor coaches. Penn state just finally got into it. Finally. So we can compete
I’d settle for a mute button each time the head coach says FAKE PUNT or FAKE FIELD GOAL.Hopefully, they hire a clock management coach.