ADVERTISEMENT

AG Kane Said to Be Facing Inquiries on Multiple Fronts

step.eng69

Well-Known Member
Nov 7, 2012
12,803
14,886
1
North East PA, Backmountain area, age 75
Last edited:
Because she has a lot of dirt on our politicians, and they are anxious as hell to kill her off before she reveals any of it?

We'll see if there is really an "active" FBI investigation. None of this stuff is federal. I suspect it is another rumor to make her look bad, to damage her before she damages any of the big players in the state who are quite nervous.
 
Because she has a lot of dirt on our politicians, and they are anxious as hell to kill her off before she reveals any of it?

We'll see if there is really an "active" FBI investigation. None of this stuff is federal. I suspect it is another rumor to make her look bad, to damage her before she damages any of the big players in the state who are quite nervous.
Maybe you're right, another rumor....I'm reaching for something good to happen already in Kane's debacle.
thanks
 
Rats...As the World Turns....hoping someone had info about the FBI looking into other persons involved with the Kane mess other than Kane.... aka the "Corbett cronies"

You'd think if the FBI was looking into anyone it'd be Fina et al.

I was wondering why Kane hasn't asked the feds for help in taking down corbett/finas corrupt cabal. But oh well...
 
  • Like
Reactions: step.eng69
I don't know if there is an FBI investigation or not but it would be a good story for her political foes to spread. There's nothing like innuendo to start the rumor mill. How can anyone defend themselves against something like that if it isn't true especially given the fact the FBI never confirms or denies investigations are taking place?
 
I don't know if there is an FBI investigation or not but it would be a good story for her political foes to spread. There's nothing like innuendo to start the rumor mill. How can anyone defend themselves against something like that if it isn't true especially given the fact the FBI never confirms or denies investigations are taking place?
If this alleged FBI investigation moves at the same pace as the alleged FBI investigation into The Second Mile, Kane could complete a second term before we hear anything.
 
I don't know if there is an FBI investigation or not but it would be a good story for her political foes to spread. There's nothing like innuendo to start the rumor mill. How can anyone defend themselves against something like that if it isn't true especially given the fact the FBI never confirms or denies investigations are taking place?

Yeah...this whole FBI story reeks of Fina (from an unnamed source of course!)....his go to move is manipulation of the press against his political enemies.

With Fina and crew's abuse/misuse of the GJ system (a GJ system he is currently abusing to try and take down a duly elected PA AG mind you) in PA for the past 8 years or so you'd think the FBI/U.S. Attorneys in PA would be all over Fina...maybe they already are for all we know.

The U.S. Attorneys would be the perfect outlet for Kane to turn to if she did feel the corruption in PA was too entrenched for her to take down by herself.

Plus, since we are now in a situation where a county DA (R) is bringing charges against a state AG (D) perhaps the U.S. Attorneys/Feds are the only folks who can step in an adjudicate this mess? Otherwise how is it possible, if Kane's case does go to trial, for either side to not have COI's if the trial is in a state court or county court?
 
Yeah...this whole FBI story reeks of Fina (from an unnamed source of course!)....his go to move is manipulation of the press against his political enemies.

With Fina and crew's abuse/misuse of the GJ system (a GJ system he is currently abusing to try and take down a duly elected PA AG mind you) in PA for the past 8 years or so you'd think the FBI/U.S. Attorneys in PA would be all over Fina...maybe they already are for all we know.

The U.S. Attorneys would be the perfect outlet for Kane to turn to if she did feel the corruption in PA was too entrenched for her to take down by herself.

Plus, since we are now in a situation where a county DA (R) is bringing charges against a state AG (D) perhaps the U.S. Attorneys/Feds are the only folks who can step in an adjudicate this mess? Otherwise how is it possible, if Kane's case does go to trial, for either side to not have COI's if the trial is in a state court or county court?
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...roblem_with_law_schools_too_many_lawyers.html

FWIW - I believe that 40,000 per year number is now up to about 45,000

"The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers."
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeR0206
What alternate universe do you folks reside in?

I have no idea if this FBI thing is a rumor or not. What I do know is Kane has been caught lying on numerous occasions.

At an April 10th news conference where she dared Williams to take the corruption case, and basically guaranteed he would have access to all the evidence, she said the following:

“Our special agent in charge put that in a note, in his case note, and did an affidavit to that effect. . . . That is the evidence we have.”

That note and affidavit never existed. What she turned over, only after Williams got a judicial order, was a memo by one of her staff members dated 4 days after the news conference (April 14th). She hasn't disputed this for the guys wearing tin foil hats.

That has nothing to do with Corbett, Fina, pornographic emails, or any other asinine excuse you want to throw out there.

Kane is liar and your endless defense of her is pathetic.
 
What alternate universe do you folks reside in?

I have no idea if this FBI thing is a rumor or not. What I do know is Kane has been caught lying on numerous occasions.

At an April 10th news conference where she dared Williams to take the corruption case, and basically guaranteed he would have access to all the evidence, she said the following:

“Our special agent in charge put that in a note, in his case note, and did an affidavit to that effect. . . . That is the evidence we have.”

That note and affidavit never existed. What she turned over, only after Williams got a judicial order, was a memo by one of her staff members dated 4 days after the news conference (April 14th). She hasn't disputed this for the guys wearing tin foil hats.

That has nothing to do with Corbett, Fina, pornographic emails, or any other asinine excuse you want to throw out there.

Kane is liar and your endless defense of her is pathetic.
th
 
  • Like
Reactions: step.eng69
What alternate universe do you folks reside in?

I have no idea if this FBI thing is a rumor or not. What I do know is Kane has been caught lying on numerous occasions.

At an April 10th news conference where she dared Williams to take the corruption case, and basically guaranteed he would have access to all the evidence, she said the following:

“Our special agent in charge put that in a note, in his case note, and did an affidavit to that effect. . . . That is the evidence we have.”

That note and affidavit never existed. What she turned over, only after Williams got a judicial order, was a memo by one of her staff members dated 4 days after the news conference (April 14th). She hasn't disputed this for the guys wearing tin foil hats.

That has nothing to do with Corbett, Fina, pornographic emails, or any other asinine excuse you want to throw out there.

Kane is liar and your endless defense of her is pathetic.

And this is what you're hanging your hat on? Did she or did she not provide Seth access to the evidence? If so whatever you pointed out above is moot.

Whatever mistakes/blunders Kane has had (and there are many) don't justify/excuse Fina's abuse of the GJ system (for YEARS mind you--DeNaples GJ leaks, JS GJ leaks, Kane GJ leaks, etc.) to go after a political enemy so that he doesn't get embarrassed/forced to resign in disgrace after his misogynistic/racist/God knows what else emails are exposed.
 
And this is what you're hanging your hat on? Did she or did she not provide Seth access to the evidence? If so whatever you pointed out above is moot.

Whatever mistakes/blunders Kane has had (and there are many) don't justify/excuse Fina's abuse of the GJ system (for YEARS mind you--DeNaples GJ leaks, JS GJ leaks, Kane GJ leaks, etc.) to go after a political enemy so that he doesn't get embarrassed/forced to resign in disgrace after his misogynistic/racist/God knows what else emails are exposed.
You're literally the dumbest human I've encountered.

The affidavit never existed, she made it up you nitwit. It's a proven fact that has never been challenged by Kane.

4 days after the news conference a staff member created an unsworn memo detailing Claude Thomas supposed claims of racial targeting. Thomas has denied making any such claims, in a real affidavit, and is suing Kane.

If you think an AG claiming she has an affidavit that doesn't exist isn't relevant you're hopeless.

You're the same guy who is all about truth, justice, and the American way when comes to Sandusky. Funny how you change your tune when your agenda doesn't match the circumstances.
 
And this is what you're hanging your hat on? Did she or did she not provide Seth access to the evidence? If so whatever you pointed out above is moot.

Whatever mistakes/blunders Kane has had (and there are many) don't justify/excuse Fina's abuse of the GJ system (for YEARS mind you--DeNaples GJ leaks, JS GJ leaks, Kane GJ leaks, etc.) to go after a political enemy so that he doesn't get embarrassed/forced to resign in disgrace after his misogynistic/racist/God knows what else emails are exposed.
Well said, but tou should Cool down WeR....your getting close to redlining your tachometer, you'll blow a trany ...well..
I don't mean that kind of trany, I mean one with gearso_O
 
You're literally the dumbest human I've encountered.

The affidavit never existed, she made it up you nitwit. It's a proven fact that has never been challenged by Kane.

4 days after the news conference a staff member created an unsworn memo detailing Claude Thomas supposed claims of racial targeting. Thomas has denied making any such claims, in a real affidavit, and is suing Kane.

If you think an AG claiming she has an affidavit that doesn't exist isn't relevant you're hopeless.

You're the same guy who is all about truth, justice, and the American way when comes to Sandusky. Funny how you change your tune when your agenda doesn't match the circumstances.

You never answered my question. Did she or did she not end up providing Seth with the information he was requesting?

I guess it never occurred to you that Fina still has a lot of friends in the AG office. Perhaps this guy you keep talking about is one of them and he's trying to sandbag her just like James Barker (who Kane recently fired)? Who the heck knows...it's his word against Kane's so I don't know why you are so fixated on this memo...it's pretty irrelevant to the current charges Kane is facing, which is what the discussion is actually about.

Do you know what IS relevant? A former state prosecutor (fina) abusing the GJ system so his sick derogatory emails don't get exposed. I care more about that than some memo Kane SUPPOSEDLY lied about.

I'm not changing my tune at all. In fact, when looking at what's happening to Kane right now, it's exactly the same tune. Fina and the media are all clamoring for Kane to resign BEFORE the allegations against her have even been proven beyond a reasonable doubt in a court a law. That falls right in line with my arguments for due process and the American way. Nice try though!
 
You never answered my question. Did she or did she not end up providing Seth with the information he was requesting?

I guess it never occurred to you that Fina still has a lot of friends in the AG office. Perhaps this guy you keep talking about is one of them and he's trying to sandbag her just like James Barker (who Kane recently fired)? Who the heck knows...it's his word against Kane's so I don't know why you are so fixated on this memo...it's pretty irrelevant to the current charges Kane is facing, which is what the discussion is actually about.

Do you know what IS relevant? A former state prosecutor (fina) abusing the GJ system so his sick derogatory emails don't get exposed. I care more about that than some memo Kane SUPPOSEDLY lied about.

I'm not changing my tune at all. In fact, when looking at what's happening to Kane right now, it's exactly the same tune. Fina and the media are all clamoring for Kane to resign BEFORE the allegations against her have even been proven beyond a reasonable doubt in a court a law. That falls right in line with my arguments for due process and the American way. Nice try though!
I remember Kane handing over the information to Williams, I f she didn't there would have been a hell of a lot of press, and also remember Fina requesting Carpenter to seal his emails, and Carpenter obliged.
 
You're literally the dumbest human I've encountered.

The affidavit never existed, she made it up you nitwit. It's a proven fact that has never been challenged by Kane.

4 days after the news conference a staff member created an unsworn memo detailing Claude Thomas supposed claims of racial targeting. Thomas has denied making any such claims, in a real affidavit, and is suing Kane.

If you think an AG claiming she has an affidavit that doesn't exist isn't relevant you're hopeless.

You're the same guy who is all about truth, justice, and the American way when comes to Sandusky. Funny how you change your tune when your agenda doesn't match the circumstances.


Has it ever occurred to you for even a few seconds that maybe it is you who is the dumb one?
 
You never answered my question. Did she or did she not end up providing Seth with the information he was requesting?

I guess it never occurred to you that Fina still has a lot of friends in the AG office. Perhaps this guy you keep talking about is one of them and he's trying to sandbag her just like James Barker (who Kane recently fired)? Who the heck knows...it's his word against Kane's so I don't know why you are so fixated on this memo...it's pretty irrelevant to the current charges Kane is facing, which is what the discussion is actually about.

Do you know what IS relevant? A former state prosecutor (fina) abusing the GJ system so his sick derogatory emails don't get exposed. I care more about that than some memo Kane SUPPOSEDLY lied about.

I'm not changing my tune at all. In fact, when looking at what's happening to Kane right now, it's exactly the same tune. Fina and the media are all clamoring for Kane to resign BEFORE the allegations against her have even been proven beyond a reasonable doubt in a court a law. That falls right in line with my arguments for due process and the American way. Nice try though!
I'll break it down for you nice and slow.

The supposed evidence she publicly based her claim of racial targeting on, and by extension the valid reason she couldn't prosecute the case, NEVER EXISTED. She just made it up.

Read what she said again:

“Our special agent in charge put that in a note, in his case note, and did an affidavit to that effect. . . . That is the evidence we have.”

That was PROVEN to be a complete fabrication. There was no evidence to turn over.

Do you understand?

The point is you're acting like Kane is some victim in all of this. She is just as dishonest as the rest of them.

It's mind boggling to see you guys buy into some conspiracy when Kane is a proven liar that will say anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe Pa Thetic
I'll break it down for you nice and slow.

The supposed evidence she publicly based her claim of racial targeting on, and by extension the valid reason she couldn't prosecute the case, NEVER EXISTED. She just made it up.

Read what she said again:

“Our special agent in charge put that in a note, in his case note, and did an affidavit to that effect. . . . That is the evidence we have.”

That was PROVEN to be a complete fabrication. There was no evidence to turn over.

Do you understand?

The point is you're acting like Kane is some victim in all of this. She is just as dishonest as the rest of them.

It's mind boggling to see you guys buy into some conspiracy when Kane is a proven liar that will say anything.


crazy-sign-smiley-emoticon.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: simons96
I'll break it down for you nice and slow.

The supposed evidence she publicly based her claim of racial targeting on, and by extension the valid reason she couldn't prosecute the case, NEVER EXISTED. She just made it up.

Read what she said again:

“Our special agent in charge put that in a note, in his case note, and did an affidavit to that effect. . . . That is the evidence we have.”

That was PROVEN to be a complete fabrication. There was no evidence to turn over.

Do you understand?

The point is you're acting like Kane is some victim in all of this. She is just as dishonest as the rest of them.

It's mind boggling to see you guys buy into some conspiracy when Kane is a proven liar that will say anything.

The racial targeting (almost all of the targets of the sting operation were black democrats--which is an indisputable fact by the way) was one of MANY issues Kane had with Fina's crap sting operation, however it wasn't the main reason for why Kane didin't prosecute.

The MAIN issue was the undercover person (Ali) getting ALL 2,088 charges against him for defrauding the state out of $400K+ dropped by fina WEEKS before Kane took office thus removing any leverage the OAG had to compel him to cooperate and testify in trial, etc.. Without Ali's cooperation (who NEVER should have been given this deal in the first place mind you) the case was a complete dumpster fire. You add to that the fact that almost all of the sting targets were black democrats and all the other issues and it's no wonder why Kane decided to not pursue the prosecution and told your buddy Seth to have at it if he was so outraged over the unreported gifts the philly democrats took (note that Seth apparently has zero outrage or issue with his bff Fina letting the actual big fish in this whole mess, Ali, go completely scott free).

Even before Fina dropped all 2,088 charges neither he nor Kane's two predecssors (Kelly and Ryan) did ANYTHING with this case (if it was so strong why didn't they prosecute it?). It sat dormant for 18 months before it got handed to Kane. Fina's last minute maneuvering to nolle pros. the Ali charges right before Kane took office was done so the case would be a time bomb that would blow up in her face and Fina could try and go after her in the press for "playing politics" when she was forced to drop it/not prosecute the garbage case handed to her. Anyone without their head firmly planted in their ass can see this.

The real victim in all of this is the citizens of PA for having to deal with corrupt filth like Corbett/Fina/et al. in the OAG for the past few years. Instead of going after criminals they were too busy trying to take down their political enemies via computergate, bonusgate, etc., abusing the GJ system via illegal leaks to the press, and swapping porn and God knows what else in those 20 MILLION deleted emails.

The 800% increase in child predator arrests since Kane took office speaks for itself. Either the state of PA just had a random influx of child predators or Corbett/Fina weren't doing a very good job of protecting PA's citizens. I think you know damn well it's the latter.
 
I wonder if people here can understand that people are innocent until proven guilty. Arrests don't tell me if they did it, convictions tell the story now, don't they?
 
Duly elected officials have been know to commit crimes. It's not like this is new.
 
Should Move the posting to:

The "Kane Iquiries" thread. Sources.....
bjf1984, 49 minutes ago
  1. bjf1984


    I'll attach the full article below....but here is the synopsis:

    The sources for the story regarding Kane are:

    1 - "Sources inside the Philadelphia DA office" aka Seth Williams and Frank Fina
    Really?

    and

    2 - Leaks from the Philadelphia GJ (you couldn't make this shit up if you tried) that was empaneled to investigate the "Bribery Case" that Kane dropped. Empaneled by? You know who.....our boy Seth.
full article, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ralpieE
What alternate universe do you folks reside in?

I have no idea if this FBI thing is a rumor or not. What I do know is Kane has been caught lying on numerous occasions.

At an April 10th news conference where she dared Williams to take the corruption case, and basically guaranteed he would have access to all the evidence, she said the following:

“Our special agent in charge put that in a note, in his case note, and did an affidavit to that effect. . . . That is the evidence we have.”

That note and affidavit never existed. What she turned over, only after Williams got a judicial order, was a memo by one of her staff members dated 4 days after the news conference (April 14th). She hasn't disputed this for the guys wearing tin foil hats.

That has nothing to do with Corbett, Fina, pornographic emails, or any other asinine excuse you want to throw out there.

Kane is liar and your endless defense of her is pathetic.

She appears to be the tallest midget in the land of Lollipop Kids...what a crack of sh-t this whole thing is. Really hope the FEDS...anyone ...intervenes and digs deep into Pa Politics...expose all the cowards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nittany Ned2
The racial targeting (almost all of the targets of the sting operation were black democrats--which is an indisputable fact by the way) was one of MANY issues Kane had with Fina's crap sting operation, however it wasn't the main reason for why Kane didin't prosecute.

The MAIN issue was the undercover person (Ali) getting ALL 2,088 charges against him for defrauding the state out of $400K+ dropped by fina WEEKS before Kane took office thus removing any leverage the OAG had to compel him to cooperate and testify in trial, etc.. Without Ali's cooperation (who NEVER should have been given this deal in the first place mind you) the case was a complete dumpster fire. You add to that the fact that almost all of the sting targets were black democrats and all the other issues and it's no wonder why Kane decided to not pursue the prosecution and told your buddy Seth to have at it if he was so outraged over the unreported gifts the philly democrats took (note that Seth apparently has zero outrage or issue with his bff Fina letting the actual big fish in this whole mess, Ali, go completely scott free).

Even before Fina dropped all 2,088 charges neither he nor Kane's two predecssors (Kelly and Ryan) did ANYTHING with this case (if it was so strong why didn't they prosecute it?). It sat dormant for 18 months before it got handed to Kane. Fina's last minute maneuvering to nolle pros. the Ali charges right before Kane took office was done so the case would be a time bomb that would blow up in her face and Fina could try and go after her in the press for "playing politics" when she was forced to drop it/not prosecute the garbage case handed to her. Anyone without their head firmly planted in their ass can see this.

The real victim in all of this is the citizens of PA for having to deal with corrupt filth like Corbett/Fina/et al. in the OAG for the past few years. Instead of going after criminals they were too busy trying to take down their political enemies via computergate, bonusgate, etc., abusing the GJ system via illegal leaks to the press, and swapping porn and God knows what else in those 20 MILLION deleted emails.

The 800% increase in child predator arrests since Kane took office speaks for itself. Either the state of PA just had a random influx of child predators or Corbett/Fina weren't doing a very good job of protecting PA's citizens. I think you know damn well it's the latter.
Jesus you're thick.

The entire reason for the deal was his cooperation in the case. To claim you can't prosecute because of the person you just signed off on a deal for is asinine.

More importantly, THEY HAD IT ON TAPE!!! They took the bribes, period. There's no way around it.

At the very least she had responsibility to make sure the officials were removed from their positions. According to Williams it wasn't even turned over to the State Ethics Commission.

All available evidence points to her playing party politics and getting exposed.

Believe whatever you want. Fact is she decided to publicly claim she had evidence that didn't exist. If you really think it's reasonable to believe any other claims she made I don't know what to tell you.
 
Jesus you're thick.

The entire reason for the deal was his cooperation in the case. To claim you can't prosecute because of the person you just signed off on a deal for is asinine.

More importantly, THEY HAD IT ON TAPE!!! They took the bribes, period. There's no way around it.

At the very least she had responsibility to make sure the officials were removed from their positions. According to Williams it wasn't even turned over to the State Ethics Commission.

All available evidence points to her playing party politics and getting exposed.

Believe whatever you want. Fact is she decided to publicly claim she had evidence that didn't exist. If you really think it's reasonable to believe any other claims she made I don't know what to tell you.


farting.jpg~c200
 
Jesus you're thick.

The entire reason for the deal was his cooperation in the case. To claim you can't prosecute because of the person you just signed off on a deal for is asinine.

More importantly, THEY HAD IT ON TAPE!!! They took the bribes, period. There's no way around it.

At the very least she had responsibility to make sure the officials were removed from their positions. According to Williams it wasn't even turned over to the State Ethics Commission.

All available evidence points to her playing party politics and getting exposed.

Believe whatever you want. Fact is she decided to publicly claim she had evidence that didn't exist. If you really think it's reasonable to believe any other claims she made I don't know what to tell you.
LMAO What a douche.

"THEY HAD IT ON TAPE!!! They took the bribes, period. There's no way around it."

So....in this grand-slam case that Fina and WIlliams had.....where, as you claim THEY HAD IT ON TAPE!!! THEY TOOK THE BRIBES, PERIOD. THERE'S NO WAY AROUND IT!!!

How many bribery convictions did that crack prosecution team of Fina and WIlliams come up with?

Let me clue you in......its a number that only Chuck Norris can divide by.

th


http://articles.philly.com/2014-12-05/news/56761342_1_judges-philadelphia-traffic-court-satisfaction


Ol' Frank and Seth got a plea to "Conflict of Interest" out of the Traffic Court Judge.....in exchange for 0 jail time, and a REDUCTION in her sentence for an unrelated Perjury conviction in a ticket-fixing scheme.
Christ, She would probably have copped to a couple dozen unsolved murders, and a few arsons to boot, if the deal was an greater reduction in sentence :)


Frank and Seth headed to court:
th



Ol' Frank and Seth really brought the wood to that case! Traded off reduced jail time in an unrelated case, in order to secure that "conflict of interest" plea.......all done so that they could crow about that slam-dunk Bribery sting that Kane dropped.

The Philly Inky - of course - was happy to oblige.....printing story after story with headlines that told the "unwashed masses" all about the BRIBERY convictions...that never happened.

LMAO


Some people are so freakin' stupid you have to wonder when the evolutionary cycle started running in reverse.
 
Last edited:
LMAO What a douche.

"THEY HAD IT ON TAPE!!! They took the bribes, period. There's no way around it."

So....in this grand-slam case that Fina and WIlliams had.....where, as you claim THEY HAD IT ON TAPE!!! THEY TOOK THE BRIBES, PERIOD. THERE'S NO WAY AROUND IT!!!

How many bribery convictions did that crack prosecution team of Fina and WIlliams come up with?

Let me clue you in......its a number that only Chuck Norris can divide by.

th


http://articles.philly.com/2014-12-05/news/56761342_1_judges-philadelphia-traffic-court-satisfaction


Ol' Frank and Seth got a plea to "Conflict of Interest" out of the Traffic Court Judge.....in exchange for 0 jail time, and a REDUCTION in her sentence for an unrelated Perjury conviction in a ticket-fixing scheme.
Christ, She would probably have copped to a couple dozen unsolved murders, and a few arsons to boot, if the deal was an greater reduction in sentence :)


Frank and Seth headed to court:
th



Ol' Frank and Seth really brought the wood to that case! Traded off reduced jail time in an unrelated case, in order to secure that "conflict of interest" plea.......all done so that they could crow about that slam-dunk Bribery sting that Kane dropped.

The Philly Inky - of course - was happy to oblige.....printing story after story with headlines that told the "unwashed masses" all about the BRIBERY convictions...that never happened.

LMAO


Some people are so freakin' stupid you have to wonder when the evolutionary cycle started running in reverse.

L.T. Young said:
Jesus you're thick.
bjf said: Christ, She would probably have copped to a couple dozen unsolved murders

Hell, Jesus & Christ are getting a lot of "likes" today....
 
Jesus you're thick.

The entire reason for the deal was his cooperation in the case. To claim you can't prosecute because of the person you just signed off on a deal for is asinine.

More importantly, THEY HAD IT ON TAPE!!! They took the bribes, period. There's no way around it.

At the very least she had responsibility to make sure the officials were removed from their positions. According to Williams it wasn't even turned over to the State Ethics Commission.

All available evidence points to her playing party politics and getting exposed.

Believe whatever you want. Fact is she decided to publicly claim she had evidence that didn't exist. If you really think it's reasonable to believe any other claims she made I don't know what to tell you.

The only person who's getting exposed for playing politics is Fina and his cronies (or did you forget about those 20 MILLION emails he's trying desperately to keep hidden via his GJ manipulation and calls for Kane to resign due to the criminal charges brought by his cronies??).

First of all, the "deal" never should have been on the table in the first place. In what logical world does a prosecutor give the big fish a COMPLETE PASS to go after some minnows? In the non bizarro/non corrupt world it's the other way around -- use the minnows to take out the big fish (aka Ali). Secondly you don't cut a deal like that with a KEY witness BEFORE the trial has even happened. Once everything is said and done THEN you cut the deal for their cooperation.

Why in the world would Fina nolle pros. all the charges (those charges were the only reason Ali was cooperating in the first place, genius) against Ali right as Fina was about to leave the OAG anyway...why not leave that decision up to the next OAG who was just about to take office?? It makes no sense unless he was deliberately trying to sandbag the case so he could pin it on Kane when she was forced to admit the case was garbage and not prosecutable due to fina's antics/bungling of the whole investigation.

As I've asked and Aoshiro has also pointed out, if the case was such a slam dunk why didn't Fina, Kelly, or Ryan do ANYTHING with it?? They sat on it for a year and a half doing next to nothing. Then, weeks before Kane takes office in 2013, boom, nolle pros deal between fina and his boy Ali. How convenient!! That doesn't strike you as odd??
 
At the very least she had responsibility to make sure the officials were removed from their positions. According to Williams it wasn't even turned over to the State Ethics Commission.

At the very least Fina had a responsibility to prosecute the guy who defrauded the state's elderly and young out of $400,000+. Fina is the one who should be reprimanded for giving Ali the deal of the century all so he could go after some black democrats who collectively took less than 20,000 in unreported gifts.

Oh yeah, and don't forget...Fina's botched blingsting investigation also had OVER $30,000 of unaccounted for money/expenses, which ironically is MORE than the 5 philly democats supposedly took.. Whoopsies! Where's your outrage over that?? Perhaps he should be prosecuted for misplacing tax payer $$$....
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT