Bernie supporters love hedge fund managers 
Don't dismiss Tom Steyer: He's the most media-savvy candidate going
By Joe Ferullo, opinion contributor — 07/09/19 10:40 AM EDT 129
Even before he officially announced today, pundits dismissed California billionaire Tom SteyerThomas (Tom) Fahr run for the Democratic presidential nomination. That’s a mistake. From a purely media perspective, attention must be paid.
Steyer, a billionaire former hedge fund manager turned liberal activist, has acquired a talent that is in short supply among candidates this season: the ability to say fairly radical things in a way that makes him sound sensible and trustworthy.
Many people across the country have seen his TV commercial pushing for President TrumpDonald John TrumpGraham open to investigating Acosta-Epstein plea dealSustaining progress with Mexico on migrationGovernment to issue licenses for business with HuaweiMORE’s removal, part of Steyer’s $10 million campaign called “Need to Impeach.” Nearly every poll will tell you this is a divisive issue; House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
Nancy PelosiGraham open to investigating Acosta-Epstein plea deal. Don't dismiss Tom Steyer: He's the most media-savvy candidate goingKlobuchar says Acosta should step down over Epstein caseMORE (D-Calif.) has struggled to suppress the discussion, calling it a polarizing distraction from the 2020 campaign.
Nonetheless, something about that ad pulls you in. It’s Tom Steyer himself, and the way he’s produced his pitch.
The sell starts out like most political spots: slow-motion video of the president played to moody music while a voice-over cites his misdeeds. The voice belongs to Steyer — but he is not shrill or over-heated. He’s calm.
The camera then cuts to Steyer, sitting in his living room, dressed in a casual blue shirt. The lighting is soft, the background warm. In the final 30 seconds, the Californian calls Trump “a clear and present danger” and “mentally unstable.” His tone remains determined but composed, moderate, with an unpolished quality that comes across as authentic. The message beneath the message: Steyer is not a wild-eyed radical; he’s thoughtful, even reasonable. He’s working hard to make you feel comfortable with him, and with the tough directive he’s delivering.
By one important measure, the ad worked: As of May, 8 million people had signed on to his impeachment movement, making it by one count the largest political organization outside of the Democratic and Republican parties. That’s the result of a sophisticated, well-funded and coordinated communication effort involving TV, digital, emails and social media.
Steyer also produced a follow-up commercial, highlighting some of those 8 million. Shot in the heartland city of Minneapolis, the TV spot shows people gathering to meet him. There are quick cuts of everyday Americans, speaking to each other in their considerate, friendly Midwestern manner. Not a crazy human in the bunch, just a lot of people like you and me. Steyer is on a simple stage in that same blue shirt, thanking everyone for helping to “build a community” and to confront this “attack on our values.” This time the music is upbeat and bright; it’s (almost) “Morning in America.”
Subject matter aside, that’s simply a smart use of optimistic imagery and presents a legitimate alternative to current candidates who feel anger and frustration are the best way to communicate commitment. teyer reminds me of another billionaire in politics: Michael BloombergMichael Rubens BloombergDon't dismiss Tom Steyer: He's the most media-savvy candidate goingPrince Harry, Meghan Markle promote environmental activists: 'There is a ticking clock to protect our planet'The Hill's Morning Report — Trump pushes Mexico for 'significantly more' as tariffs loomMORE. The former New York mayor captured a lot of attention earlier this year when he explored a run for the presidency himself. Bloomberg would have campaigned as a centrist; Steyer is left of that — just how far left is unclear, at least right now. But they share a certain sensibility.
Like Steyer, Bloomberg wasn’t flashy; he wasn’t a great public speaker. But he made people feel confident about change. He conveyed a trustworthiness that allowed him to initiate policies most New York mayors would not have attempted. Bloomberg raised taxes to eliminate the city’s budget deficit (then lowered taxes when he created a surplus); he built bicycle lanes in the middle of crowded midtown Manhattan, turned streets into pedestrian malls and banned smoking in restaurants. Most of these programs worked, despite every New Yorker’s well-guarded right to complain about everything.
Tom Steyer may not be a carbon-copy of Michael Bloomberg but — like the former mayor — he seems to understand how to use media to cut through the noise: When all about you are losing their heads, you stay composed.
Even so, yes, it’s true — just because he has a lot of money (he spent $67 million in support of Democratic campaigns during the 2018 election cycle) doesn’t mean Steyer can buy his way into a viable candidacy. But neither should he be so quickly cast aside. His long-time involvement with Democratic Party politics, the environment and income inequality all make this more than a vanity operation.
And his media savvy — television, digital, social — means that, at the very least, other candidates should be looking over their shoulders and taking some notes.
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaig...eyer-hes-the-most-media-savvy-candidate-going
Don't dismiss Tom Steyer: He's the most media-savvy candidate going
By Joe Ferullo, opinion contributor — 07/09/19 10:40 AM EDT 129
Even before he officially announced today, pundits dismissed California billionaire Tom SteyerThomas (Tom) Fahr run for the Democratic presidential nomination. That’s a mistake. From a purely media perspective, attention must be paid.
Steyer, a billionaire former hedge fund manager turned liberal activist, has acquired a talent that is in short supply among candidates this season: the ability to say fairly radical things in a way that makes him sound sensible and trustworthy.
Many people across the country have seen his TV commercial pushing for President TrumpDonald John TrumpGraham open to investigating Acosta-Epstein plea dealSustaining progress with Mexico on migrationGovernment to issue licenses for business with HuaweiMORE’s removal, part of Steyer’s $10 million campaign called “Need to Impeach.” Nearly every poll will tell you this is a divisive issue; House Speaker Nancy Pelosi
Nancy PelosiGraham open to investigating Acosta-Epstein plea deal. Don't dismiss Tom Steyer: He's the most media-savvy candidate goingKlobuchar says Acosta should step down over Epstein caseMORE (D-Calif.) has struggled to suppress the discussion, calling it a polarizing distraction from the 2020 campaign.
Nonetheless, something about that ad pulls you in. It’s Tom Steyer himself, and the way he’s produced his pitch.
The sell starts out like most political spots: slow-motion video of the president played to moody music while a voice-over cites his misdeeds. The voice belongs to Steyer — but he is not shrill or over-heated. He’s calm.
The camera then cuts to Steyer, sitting in his living room, dressed in a casual blue shirt. The lighting is soft, the background warm. In the final 30 seconds, the Californian calls Trump “a clear and present danger” and “mentally unstable.” His tone remains determined but composed, moderate, with an unpolished quality that comes across as authentic. The message beneath the message: Steyer is not a wild-eyed radical; he’s thoughtful, even reasonable. He’s working hard to make you feel comfortable with him, and with the tough directive he’s delivering.
By one important measure, the ad worked: As of May, 8 million people had signed on to his impeachment movement, making it by one count the largest political organization outside of the Democratic and Republican parties. That’s the result of a sophisticated, well-funded and coordinated communication effort involving TV, digital, emails and social media.
Steyer also produced a follow-up commercial, highlighting some of those 8 million. Shot in the heartland city of Minneapolis, the TV spot shows people gathering to meet him. There are quick cuts of everyday Americans, speaking to each other in their considerate, friendly Midwestern manner. Not a crazy human in the bunch, just a lot of people like you and me. Steyer is on a simple stage in that same blue shirt, thanking everyone for helping to “build a community” and to confront this “attack on our values.” This time the music is upbeat and bright; it’s (almost) “Morning in America.”
Subject matter aside, that’s simply a smart use of optimistic imagery and presents a legitimate alternative to current candidates who feel anger and frustration are the best way to communicate commitment. teyer reminds me of another billionaire in politics: Michael BloombergMichael Rubens BloombergDon't dismiss Tom Steyer: He's the most media-savvy candidate goingPrince Harry, Meghan Markle promote environmental activists: 'There is a ticking clock to protect our planet'The Hill's Morning Report — Trump pushes Mexico for 'significantly more' as tariffs loomMORE. The former New York mayor captured a lot of attention earlier this year when he explored a run for the presidency himself. Bloomberg would have campaigned as a centrist; Steyer is left of that — just how far left is unclear, at least right now. But they share a certain sensibility.
Like Steyer, Bloomberg wasn’t flashy; he wasn’t a great public speaker. But he made people feel confident about change. He conveyed a trustworthiness that allowed him to initiate policies most New York mayors would not have attempted. Bloomberg raised taxes to eliminate the city’s budget deficit (then lowered taxes when he created a surplus); he built bicycle lanes in the middle of crowded midtown Manhattan, turned streets into pedestrian malls and banned smoking in restaurants. Most of these programs worked, despite every New Yorker’s well-guarded right to complain about everything.
Tom Steyer may not be a carbon-copy of Michael Bloomberg but — like the former mayor — he seems to understand how to use media to cut through the noise: When all about you are losing their heads, you stay composed.
Even so, yes, it’s true — just because he has a lot of money (he spent $67 million in support of Democratic campaigns during the 2018 election cycle) doesn’t mean Steyer can buy his way into a viable candidacy. But neither should he be so quickly cast aside. His long-time involvement with Democratic Party politics, the environment and income inequality all make this more than a vanity operation.
And his media savvy — television, digital, social — means that, at the very least, other candidates should be looking over their shoulders and taking some notes.
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaig...eyer-hes-the-most-media-savvy-candidate-going
Last edited:
