ADVERTISEMENT

Best example of the corrupt BOTurds intentionally misleading statements and behavior even OAG...

Wow, amazing how 'ole two-faced Tommy Corbutt's story has morphed over time....his initial position was that he signed the multi-million $$$ State-grant to The Second Mile in the Summer 2011 and didn't say anything to his fellow PSU Trustees about the Sandusky investigation, because he didn't want to alert Sandusky to the fact that he was being investigated in regards to Victim 1. He then changed that story because it was subsequently revealed that Sandusky knew he was under investigation for V1 all the way back to the Spring 2009 because of the way the State Investigation was initiated (e.g., via V1 making a formal CSA complaint to Clinton County CYS and CYS forwarding the CSA complaint to DPW which subsequently conducted their own investigation and hearing and INDICATED Sandusky in the Spring 2009. They also turned the matter over to law enforcement - the Clinton County DA who referred it to the Centre County DA, Michael Madeira - who was Tom Corbett's right-hand man at the OAG before winning election to Centre County DA....he also is married to Matt Sandusky's sister. Michael Madeira turned the matter over to Corbett in March 2009. The most Senior Executives at TSM have testified and documented that Jerry Sandusky himself came to them in the Spring 2009 and told them he was under investigation in regards to V1's CSA Complaint and that is when they cut his access off to children at TSM supposedly).

Corbutt has morphed his story on this matter and is clearly lying just like that other serial "intentional misinformation" giver, Cynthia Baldwin.

What would CB's motive be for lying?
 
Last edited:

CR66..Why exactly would it be Spaniers job to inform/discuss with the BOT LEGAL issues?? He's not even a lawyer for crying out load. Even if he did offer an opinion I wouldn't put much weight on it. On the other hand it was Baldwin's JOB to do so and according to the scoundrels, she never did. She was a former BOT chair and Supreme Court Justice and yet you blame Spanier....that's precious...

The deflection/spin you are trying to apply here is obvious and disgusting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ski
What would be CB's motive for lying?

Oh gee, I don't know maybe to protect herself -- she was the Vice Chair of the BOT in 2001 and was a member of the BOT in 1998 and 1999 when Sandusky was investigated by the University for portential CSA via the UPPD's most Senior Detective, Ron Schreffler, who felt so strongly he was guilty that he referred the case to the Centre County DA for prosecution, but then less than six months later Sandusky was awarded a sweetheart retirement deal that included Emeritus status that he did not qualify for (Fraudney Erickson signed the exemption for awarding it anyway) as well as full access to campus for his charity, The Second Mile. All of this was done and awarded against Paterno's wishes in regards to giving Sandusky and his charity unrestricted and unmonitored access to PSU Football and Athletic facilities. Quite obvious that the Executive Committee of the BOT's is responsible for putting Sandusky and children from his charity in the PSU Athletic Facilities unmonitored and after hours in 2001 -- not only that but this same EC of the PSU BOT then essentially gifted Sandusky land at a small fraction of its value in the spring of 2002 AFTER the 2001 incident so Sandusky could build the "Campus Facilities" and headquarters that he had always dreamed of building with the official PSU Press Release making glowing statements about Sandusky???
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ski and WeR0206
CR66..Why exactly would it be Spaniers job to inform/discuss with the BOT LEGAL issues?? He's not even a lawyer for crying out load. Even if he did offer an opinion I wouldn't put much weight on it. On the other hand it was Baldwin's JOB to do so and according to the scoundrels, she never did. She was a former BOT chair and Supreme Court Justice and yet you blame Spanier....that's precious...

The deflection/spin you are trying to apply here is obvious and disgusting.

remind us again when Baldwin was appointed University legal counsel, despite decades of outsourcing the legal work?
 
BOT the not Will Rogers, "We didn't know what we could have read in the papers." Seems I heard a story about a certain Trustee who asked Tim Curley when HE was going to do something about JS. Baldwin was anointed because she "knew the ropes" from her prior "service" as a Trustee. Last I heard she was wondering around Tampa looking for Joe. Garban may have dropped the ball, but the Corbett to Surma combo was a well oiled machine.
 
CR66..Why exactly would it be Spaniers job to inform/discuss with the BOT LEGAL issues?? He's not even a lawyer for crying out load. Even if he did offer an opinion I wouldn't put much weight on it. On the other hand it was Baldwin's JOB to do so and according to the scoundrels, she never did. She was a former BOT chair and Supreme Court Justice and yet you blame Spanier....that's precious...

The deflection/spin you are trying to apply here is obvious and disgusting.

No deflection. Just trying to school you how things work in the real world.

Spanier is the CEO of the university, had responsible for all of its functional areas including legal, and was a Board member. Spanier (not Baldwin, not Curley, not Shultz, etc) was the person responsible for keeping the full Board apprised of what was happening in the university including areas of concern. Baldwin was just staff, at Board meeting by invitation only and reported on those legal matters and to the degree her boss thought necessary. I't was Spanier and the Board's job to assess how the reported matters might affect the university if at all. Surely you don't think Baldwin was going to stand up in front of her boss and question his judgement in front of the other Board members do you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe Pa Thetic
Hmm...obstruction for starters..What would be her motive to require a proffer letter before cooperating with the OAG?

There's obviously something there for her to be worried about.

Normal procedure. In the overwhelming majority of cases, the formal, written proffer agreement will explicitly state that no promises of either immunity or a plea bargain have been made.
 
Oh gee, I don't know maybe to protect herself -- she was the Vice Chair of the BOT in 2001 and was a member of the BOT in 1998 and 1999 when Sandusky was investigated by the University for portential CSA via the UPPD's most Senior Detective, Ron Schreffler, who felt so strongly he was guilty that he referred the case to the Centre County DA for prosecution, but then less than six months later Sandusky was awarded a sweetheart retirement deal that included Emeritus status that he did not qualify for (Fraudney Erickson signed the exemption for awarding it anyway) as well as full access to campus for his charity, The Second Mile. All of this was done and awarded against Paterno's wishes in regards to giving Sandusky and his charity unrestricted and unmonitored access to PSU Football and Athletic facilities. Quite obvious that the Executive Committee of the BOT's is responsible for putting Sandusky and children from his charity in the PSU Athletic Facilities unmonitored and after hours in 2001 -- not only that but this same EC of the PSU BOT then essentially gifted Sandusky land at a small fraction of its value in the spring of 2002 AFTER the 2001 incident so Sandusky could build the "Campus Facilities" and headquarters that he had always dreamed of building with the official PSU Press Release making glowing statements about Sandusky???

This weekend is the 50th anniversary of Rod Serling's passing. I think he might still be here.
 
No Baldwin would not stand up to Spanier, instead she went behind his back to the OAG.
 
No deflection. Just trying to school you how things work in the real world.

Spanier is the CEO of the university, had responsible for all of its functional areas including legal, and was a Board member. Spanier (not Baldwin, not Curley, not Shultz, etc) was the person responsible for keeping the full Board apprised of what was happening in the university including areas of concern. Baldwin was just staff, at Board meeting by invitation only and reported on those legal matters and to the degree her boss thought necessary. I't was Spanier and the Board's job to assess how the reported matters might affect the university if at all. Surely you don't think Baldwin was going to stand up in front of her boss and question his judgement in front of the other Board members do you?

Is that the best you could come up with?? Just bc Spanier oversaw a lot of areas that doesnt make Spanier a legal expert does it? Just like all CEO's he oversaw a lot of areas but differed to "staff" experts when legal, finance, etc. issues come up or advice is needed. Baldwin was the one telling Spanier that the OAG was just fishing...no big deal, etc. Who is he to question the expertise of a former SC Judge?? He had no reason not to trust her at the time. If the BOT was misinformed its bc Baldwin wasnt giving the proper advice/doing her JOB as the legal expert advising Spanier and the BOT itselft.

Your nonsensical argument makes just as much sense as freeh/oag claiming that college admins/football coach should have known better than CYS/CC DA re: 1998. Which is to say it makes zero sense.
 
No deflection. Just trying to school you how things work in the real world.

Spanier is the CEO of the university, had responsible for all of its functional areas including legal, and was a Board member. Spanier (not Baldwin, not Curley, not Shultz, etc) was the person responsible for keeping the full Board apprised of what was happening in the university including areas of concern. Baldwin was just staff, at Board meeting by invitation only and reported on those legal matters and to the degree her boss thought necessary. I't was Spanier and the Board's job to assess how the reported matters might affect the university if at all. Surely you don't think Baldwin was going to stand up in front of her boss and question his judgement in front of the other Board members do you?

You are so full of $hit it isn't even funny -- who gives a crap what "you think" or say everybody's role is, should be, etc.... The Charter and the Pennsylvania OAG's Charitable and NPO Handbook say that the Board of Trustees primary role is OVERSIGHT. According to you, the Executive Committee has zero accountability for anything when Pennsylvania Law (which the PSU Charer is as it was enacted by the PA Legislature) and the OAG Manual for Charitable & Nonprofit Organizations says the diametric opposite -- they have the HIGHEST FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION to PSU. And you want to talk about Paterno not fulfilling his "moral obligations" -- guess what dipwad, your buddies didn't fulfill their legal or moral obligations.
 
Is that the best you could come up with?? Just bc Spanier oversaw a lot of areas that doesnt make Spanier a legal expert does it? Just like all CEO's he oversaw a lot of areas but differed to "staff" experts when legal, finance, etc. issues come up or advice is needed. Baldwin was the one telling Spanier that the OAG was just fishing...no big deal, etc. Who is he to question the expertise of a former SC Judge?? He had no reason not to trust her at the time. If the BOT was misinformed its bc Baldwin wasnt giving the proper advice/doing her JOB as the legal expert advising Spanier and the BOT itselft.

Your nonsensical argument makes just as much sense as freeh/oag claiming that college admins/football coach should have known better than CYS/CC DA re: 1998. Which is to say it makes zero sense.
They weren't misinformed at all by anyone.
 
They weren't misinformed at all by anyone.

I agree 100%. Baldwin/exec comm of the BOT knew exactly what was going on. I was merely responding to CR's ridiculous argument that the BOT was somehow misinformed by Spanier. Even if they were misinformed (which I don't buy for a second) it would have been Baldwin's fault, not Spanier's.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ski and simons96
I promise you, many people saw and knew of Sandusky a very, very long time ago, including some, not all members of BOT, and others at university and people, very influential, around SC.
So more of these rumors. Tell us who knew what and when. When did you learn of JS' illegal activities?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ski
No Baldwin would not stand up to Spanier, instead she went behind his back to the OAG.

Baldwin was a "plant" by the OAG & PA GOP in Jan 2010 who controlled that office (she is highly tied to the LZ/RA GOP-axis which "made" the political careers of TR, RS and TC...in fact she was a Governor-appointed Trustee at PSU in 1995 by Tom Ridge. Ridge also appointed Corbutt as Attorney General in 1995 to serve out EP's term after EP was convicted and sent to jail.). BTW, she was planted to "cover-up" the fraud committed at PSU in regards to "Climategate" - that story broke in Oct//Nov 2009 and Baldwin was brought in to produce the "whitewash" report that was the PSU Internal Investigation and Report which absolved PSU and its Professors of any fraud on the billions of $$$s of grants related to the matter which the PA OAG then used as an excuse not to prosecute the clear fraud which took place - PSU's Internal Investigation and Report was mocked as a complete joke and a clear self-serving fraud in itself but the GOP-controlled AG refused to do anything despite the clear multi-billion $$$ fraud that had been committed. Baldwin was a plant at PSU to act as a tool for the corrupt GOP-axis controlling PSU which includes Jake Corman (you didn't think Jake Corman made it to the Majority Leadership of the PA Senate out of his tiny little Central PA District via brilliance & hardwork, did you???).
 
you have to wonder about Carnes' motivation and persistence in continually floating BS information and spin on behalf of his masters.

one thing I learned in politics and public speaking . . . know your audience. when 99% of the people who read this board and post to it know he is full of pig excrement, one has to reflect on what he hopes to accomplish with it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ski
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT