He is well liked by many, which just goes to prove something -
Jack Raykovitz is a state-licensed professional that not only counseled many Second Mile youth, most notably Matt Sandusky, but his program targeted this population using sports and coaching and attached itself to a high profile athletic program.
Sports is a high-risk environment for child sexual abuse, as it involves: An age disparity between adults and kids; an imbalance of power between a coach and a player; differing intellectual capabilities between adult coaches and youth.
Grooming behavior by an offender goes as follows:
n Targeting a victim — the offender is looking for a vulnerability in that minor.
n Gaining trust — a coach is often perceived as a hero and a mentor.
n Recognizing and fulfilling needs – attention and positive reinforcement is given.
n Isolate the victim — the offender is the only one who understands them.
n Sexualize the relationship — “accidental nudity” in a shower or locker room.
n Maintaining control — separate the minor from their parents or friends.
Dr. Raykovitz should have known that Second Mile was a perfect grooming charity, with Jerry Sandusky exhibiting red flags of grooming behavior around Second Mile kids for years, the largest one being waved was the constant out of program contact.
Dr. Raykovitz described to the jury that after Tim Curley visited him and discussed Mike McQueary’s incident, he spoke with Jerry Sandusky and advised him to “just wear swim trunks” the next time he showers with a youth after a workout. Both the jury and state prosecutor Laura Ditka — who also prosecutes sex crimes — simply accepted Jack’s reasoning.
Telling the offender to wear swim trunks doesn’t matter, the goal of the offender upon entering a locker room with a minor is to get the youth to undress, thus breaking down barriers. This “accidental nudity” then sexualizes the relationship — the locker room or a shower is the perfect place to do that.
Any touching then confuses the child about the nature of the touching. Probing questions from parents are easily waved off with “Oh, it was just regular locker room stuff” “just guys being guys” “It won’t happen again.”
It is inexcusable for a CEO of a program that services children to recommend this as a best practice for ANY adult representing the program.
Dr. Raykovitz tells the jury he knew it was a Second Mile teen in 2001, yet failed to indentify the teen and thus failed to contact the teen’s parent(s) for more information. He failed to probe Sandusky about this of out of program contact with a Second Mile client, nor did he discuss with the full board that Penn State has now bounced all kids from being in campus buildings with Jerry Sandusky as a result. Dr. Raykovitz failed to sit down with Jerry Sandusky, identify his grooming behaviors, put the kibosh on the out of program contact with clients, and implement a written safety plan (as per state mandate) in working with Second Mile minors going forward. By implementing such a practice, the goal would be to protect the children of Second Mile from incidents of misconduct or inappropriate behavior while also protecting Second Mile staff and volunteers from false accusations.
Great Response....WHY??
Because it confirms and exposes even MORE features which were withheld from the public. It adds much more credibility to the contention that the "Penn State Scandal" was nothing but a "Story" designed to deceive the public and promote a smoke screen for OAG selected "special friends".
To me this only further validates that this WAS & IS a State of Pennsylvania Scandal. And, amazingly....This scandal is well above the crimes that Sandusky was convicted on. This REAL scandal is that the OAG constructed a "Story" that REMOVED real facts from the public.
It hid something the OAG KNEW to be true.....that the REAL MANDATED REPORTERS got away with crimes - crimes the magnitude which are now"...only known but to God..." Why...because those that REALLY had the legal responsibility to STOP children from within its"community of victims" from being abused - DID LESS THAN NOTHING!!!!!!
Which begs the question.....Is Sandusky only the tip of the iceberg??? How many more TSM kids were abused....NOT by Sandusky...but by others? A real motive of SELECTIVE PROTECTION by the OAG is what needs immediate exposure and legal action. Who else "used TSM for kids????
Is this why the TSM records had to be destroyed? Others - politically protected donors (???) - were "They" using TSM "kids" for their own purposes???
This issue of painting PSU with the ONLY LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY in this matter is nothing less than UNPUNISHED CRIMES!! Add to this the totally bogus legal processes over 7 years and you can not escape the only reasonable conclusion - this is nothing but COLLUSIVE CRIMES MADE POSSIBLE BY A CORRUPT OAG "Story" .... a "Story" only made possible by a coordinated group of public officials!
This is why we can not just "...move on..."
Last edited: