ADVERTISEMENT

Big Ten Commissioner to meet with Michigan President Friday

To be fair, the phone call went like this: Emmert -- "Your choice is, either we give you the death penalty or you can accept the harshest penalties we have ever invented" Penn State -- "We'll take the sanctions!"
Yep and the proper response was you have no authority to do that so see you in court
 
  • Like
Reactions: doctornick
No, it’s not. There is real risk. It certainly impacts player safety when the opposing team knows your plays. Society has become extremely litigious and this is a huge opportunity for attorneys willing to go this route.
Good luck to them proving that the opposition knew the play and without that there wouldn't have been an injury. There's inherent risk involved. Slim to no chance.
 
Yep and the proper response was you have no authority to do that so see you in court
I remember watching a story about the sanctions and how it was decided. As I recall from this story, we were going to get the death penalty but someone successfully advocated on our behalf to avoid it but I can't remember who they gave credit to. It may have been a holdout on the NCAA committee but not sure.
 
No, it’s not. There is real risk. It certainly impacts player safety when the opposing team knows your plays. Society has become extremely litigious and this is a huge opportunity for attorneys willing to go this route.

Not sure who but someone mentioned Hooker potentially having grounds for a lawsuit tied to his injury in the South Carolina game where Michigan provided the Cocks with the Vols’ signals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LMTLION
I remember watching a story about the sanctions and how it was decided. As I recall from this story, we were going to get the death penalty but someone successfully advocated on our behalf to avoid it but I can't remember who they gave credit to. It may have been a holdout on the NCAA committee but not sure.
This is the USA Today take from 2015. Some interesting tidbits that may be applicable to today's meeting with the President of Micheatum.

"Did Penn State really face the death penalty?"​


https://www.usatoday.com/story/spor...alty-consent-decree-rodney-erickson/21826697/
 
No, it’s not. There is real risk. It certainly impacts player safety when the opposing team knows your plays. Society has become extremely litigious and this is a huge opportunity for attorneys willing to go this route.
If you think they can sue for that then you are right that we live in an EXTREMELY litigious society. Ambulance chasers wet dream.
 
These reactions from some people are just bizarre.
Indeed.

Agreed--that why I don't think scholarship reduction is a "severe" penalty.

What starters at any school are walk ons being paid through NIL to bypass scholarship limits? I've seen this mentioned a time or 3, but I fail to follow the logic of it. Who is doing this? I'd like to see examples.
 
What starters at any school are walk ons being paid through NIL to bypass scholarship limits? I've seen this mentioned a time or 3, but I fail to follow the logic of it. Who is doing this? I'd like to see examples.
I don't think it's happened yet but it will. You don't think alumni of Michigan (or any major program) will find a way to make that happen?
 
I don't think it's happened yet but it will. You don't think alumni of Michigan (or any major program) will find a way to make that happen?

Teams are already struggling to retain depth players as is in the portal era. Now you think scholarship quality kids are going to accept walk on offers just to be paid by NIL?

Kids want to play, first and foremost. Getting paid is a perk of the gig now.
 
Indeed.



What starters at any school are walk ons being paid through NIL to bypass scholarship limits? I've seen this mentioned a time or 3, but I fail to follow the logic of it. Who is doing this? I'd like to see examples.
Is that even allowed?
 
Also the President shouldn’t step in and act until investigation. Same thing that should have happened with PSU but unfortunately their higher ups didn’t play it that way. My opinion at least.
I would respectfully disagree in that if anyone knows the details after Harbaugh, it’s the Michigan AD and prez (or at least they should by now).

He doesn’t have to wait for the glacial ncaa process. He can summon the coaches to his office and cut through the BS in an hour.

Now, if he does that and insists nothing improper was done then, by all means, defend your coach. Given what we do know, I find that hard to believe (JMO). As Michigan has now apparently fired Connor Stalions, I think it’s fair to say some of these accusations do hold water.
 
I would respectfully disagree in that if anyone knows the details after Harbaugh, it’s the Michigan AD and prez (or at least they should by now).

He doesn’t have to wait for the glacial ncaa process. He can summon the coaches to his office and cut through the BS in an hour.

Now, if he does that and insists nothing improper was done then, by all means, defend your coach. Given what we do know, I find that hard to believe (JMO). As Michigan has now apparently fired Connor Stalions, I think it’s fair to say some of these accusations do hold water.
That’s fair.
 
  • Like
Reactions: psu00
Does anyone know if the meeting alleged in the title of this thread ever happened?
 
Heard it did but nothing released. Obviously Harbaugh wasn’t suspended coming out of it.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT