I mean, c'mon, enough of him already... reminds me of the old Peter Puck days... what's really the purpose of having him on? at all? The idea of Peter Puck was to help non-hockey fans learn about hockey. I assume the purpose of Billy Baldwin is to (somehow) appeal to a broader audience (beyond wrestling fans)? Turns out non-hockey fans don't watch hockey and people who don't like wrestling do not watch it.
And my Penn State bias aside, David Taylor is soooooo much better as a commentator than Robles.... he has really awesome insights, particularly since he is still wrestling and familiar with so many of the guys individual styles.
And my Penn State bias aside, David Taylor is soooooo much better as a commentator than Robles.... he has really awesome insights, particularly since he is still wrestling and familiar with so many of the guys individual styles.