Bouts so far, through 2 duals...

[RoarLions1]

125: none
133: RBY (2)
141: Lee (2), Bartlett (3), Meredith (1)
149: Verkleeren (2), Barraclough (2), Gardner (2), Pipher (1)
157: Berge (2)
165: Lee (2), Kraeszig (3)
174: Starocci (3), Edsell (3)
184: Brooks (2)
197: Higgins (1), Ball (1)
285: Nevills (2)

 

[86PSUPaul]

With records added

125: none
133: RBY (2) 2-0
141: Lee (2) 2-0, Bartlett (3) 3-0, Meredith (1) 0-1
149: Verkleeren (2) 0-2, Barraclough (2) 1-1, Gardner (2) 2-0, Pipher (1) 0-1
157: Berge (2) 2-0
165: Lee (2) 2-0, Kraeszig (3) 3-0
174: Starocci (3) 2-1, Edsell (3) 3-0
184: Brooks (2) 2-0
197: Higgins (1) 0-1, Ball (1) 0-1
285: Nevills (2) 2-0

 

[CentexLion]

With records added

125: none
133: RBY (2) 2-0
141: Lee (2) 2-0, Bartlett (3) 3-0, Meredith (1) 0-1
149: Verkleeren (2) 0-2, Barraclough (2) 1-1, Gardner (2) 2-0, Pipher (1) 0-1
157: Berge (2) 2-0
165: Lee (2) 2-0, Kraeszig (3) 3-0
174: Starocci (3) 2-1, Edsell (3) 3-0
184: Brooks (2) 2-0
197: Higgins (1) 0-1, Ball (1) 0-1
285: Nevills (2) 2-0

Shoot. I wasn't able to watch/listen to the matches live Saturday, as I was on a 100 mile bike ride. Got home, and read the match notes, and it sounded like we went O-fer. Guess I accidentally read the Rutgres board

 

[86PSUPaul]

Shoot. I wasn't able to watch/listen to the matches live Saturday, as I was on a 100 mile bike ride. Got home, and read the match notes, and it sounded like we went O-fer. Guess I accidentally read the Rutgres board

Yeah, the board got ugly...... And I think HotShoe deleted a few choice comments

I think people got disappointed with the forfeit at 125 and the fact that Beard was not with the team and it just spiraled down with some of the other results. People did take it way too far.