https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...formant-challenged/ar-AAxG9OH?ocid=spartanntp
First, I find it amusing how the media refers to spies as “informants.” Ostensibly, this guy was a contractor for NSA. Yes? Well, NSA is in the business of spying. Ergo, the guy was spying. He wasn’t there for Happy Hour. LMAO at the insinuation.
Second, I like the moral equivalency between Trump’s team asking for opposition research (which is one of the things Muller is investigating) versus spies offering the Trump’s team opposition research. It defies logic how the former deserves a special counsel whereas the later is considered “a matter.” Wake me up I must be dreaming. Not to mention the latter constitutes entrapment.
Third, Jake Clapper was on The View yesterday to justify the spying, claiming it was counterintelligence operation against Russian meddling. Okay Jake, then where were the spies within the Clinton campaign?! This was supposed to be a non-partisan operation, not influenced by politics one way or another. It seems to me if the Russians could penetrate one campaign then they could just as easily penetrate the other. Until we see the reciprocal we the American people can only surmise one campaign had an advantage over the other, courtesy of the state.
Lastly, given Barack Obama’s penchant for micromanaging one must wonder if he knew about it. Perhaps he did and what we bear witness to is his loyal lieutenants covering for him. Put them all in orange jump suits. Turn one state’s witness and watch the bowel break!
I thank you and have a blessed day.
First, I find it amusing how the media refers to spies as “informants.” Ostensibly, this guy was a contractor for NSA. Yes? Well, NSA is in the business of spying. Ergo, the guy was spying. He wasn’t there for Happy Hour. LMAO at the insinuation.
Second, I like the moral equivalency between Trump’s team asking for opposition research (which is one of the things Muller is investigating) versus spies offering the Trump’s team opposition research. It defies logic how the former deserves a special counsel whereas the later is considered “a matter.” Wake me up I must be dreaming. Not to mention the latter constitutes entrapment.
Third, Jake Clapper was on The View yesterday to justify the spying, claiming it was counterintelligence operation against Russian meddling. Okay Jake, then where were the spies within the Clinton campaign?! This was supposed to be a non-partisan operation, not influenced by politics one way or another. It seems to me if the Russians could penetrate one campaign then they could just as easily penetrate the other. Until we see the reciprocal we the American people can only surmise one campaign had an advantage over the other, courtesy of the state.
Lastly, given Barack Obama’s penchant for micromanaging one must wonder if he knew about it. Perhaps he did and what we bear witness to is his loyal lieutenants covering for him. Put them all in orange jump suits. Turn one state’s witness and watch the bowel break!
I thank you and have a blessed day.
