ADVERTISEMENT

Colorado vs North Dakota State tonight (ESPN)

The gap is much lower than 99 or 100%, as a certain person insists. And much closer to 71% (and "not even truly ... an upset" if they lose) than to 99-100%.
Lol...again read what was written. You always alter things when you can't make an argument.
 
Lol...again read what was written. You always alter things when you can't make an argument.

What was written ...

........................... If PSU and WVU play 100 times, PSU wins 99, if not 100, of those times.

Also, what was written ...

......................... the Bison could easily win this game and it wouldn't even truly be an upset.


So, what did I alter there, kid?
 
What was written ...

........................... If PSU and WVU play 100 times, PSU wins 99, if not 100, of those times.

Also, what was written ...

......................... the Bison could easily win this game and it wouldn't even truly be an upset.


So, what did I alter there, kid?
Correct--now read what you read
 
Things we know:

Lando thinks PSU has a 99% or 100% chance of winning against WVU.
ESPN thinks PSU stands a 77.7% chance of winning against WVU.

Lando thinks a team with a 71.3% chance of winning, per ESPN, could lose and it wouldn't even truly be an upset.
Lando hearts ESPN's analysis.

PSU's chances of winning, according to ESPN, are MUCH closer to Colorado's chances of winning, according to ESPN, than to Lando's suggestion of PSU's chances of winning. Ergo, PSU's chances of losing are much closer to being categorized as not even truly being an upset than they are to the unquestionable sure thing that Lando suggested.

And Lando will be unable to explain how this is incorrect (because it isn't), but will still act childish in insisting it's not correct. Because he can never explain away his mistakes ... he just says "nuh-uh, and yer too stoopit to understand so I won't explain it!"
 
Things we know:

Lando thinks PSU has a 99% or 100% chance of winning against WVU.
ESPN thinks PSU stands a 77.7% chance of winning against WVU.

Lando thinks a team with a 71.3% chance of winning, per ESPN, could lose and it wouldn't even truly be an upset.
Lando hearts ESPN's analysis.

PSU's chances of winning, according to ESPN, are MUCH closer to Colorado's chances of winning, according to ESPN, than to Lando's suggestion of PSU's chances of winning. Ergo, PSU's chances of losing are much closer to being categorized as not even truly being an upset than they are to the unquestionable sure thing that Lando suggested.

And Lando will be unable to explain how this is incorrect (because it isn't), but will still act childish in insisting it's not correct. Because he can never explain away his mistakes ... he just says "nuh-uh, and yer too stoopit to understand so I won't explain it!"
lol--you're so lost. I'm not handholding with your and your obsession with me. Let me know when you get your next name.
 
Bison with the early 3-0 lead--Colorado have up a huge play--looks a lot like last year early for them
 
See--obsession. And, I'm not remotely wrong here but when we disagree that's always the case
Once again ... I actually explain my position. I lay out the logical syllogism ... which is valid and sound. Your response? "Nuh-uh, and I'm not telling you why!" I repeat the logical syllogism in different words and it is, again, valid and sound. Your response? "Still nuh-uh, and I'm not telling you why, but you're dumb, or obsessed, or something!"
 
Once again ... I actually explain my position. I lay out the logical syllogism ... which is valid and sound. Your response? "Nuh-uh, and I'm not telling you why!" I repeat the logical syllogism in different words and it is, again, valid and sound. Your response? "Still nuh-uh, and I'm not telling you why, but you're dumb, or obsessed, or something!"
You can’t argue with dumb or crazy. Don’t waste your time in this world.
 
10-7 NDSU--going to be interesting to see if NDSU can outscore them.
I doubt it. Colorado is only taking 4 or 5 plays to score. NDSU has to work harder and was already held to a FG.

Probably a 45 -31 type game. Colorado's defense is really bad.
 
I doubt it. Colorado is only taking 4 or 5 plays to score. NDSU has to work harder and was already held to a FG.

Probably a 45 -31 type game. Colorado's defense is really bad.
I hate NDSU changing up QBs there--Colorado very vulnerable to the pass. If they keep scoring at will and win this game it's still is going to be rough for them to do anything this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmorovich
#7 at qb was humming along and they pull him for 2 qb run plays right up the middle. Really odd play calls. Seems like they are pulling him again for this short yardage play.
 
#7 at qb was humming along and they pull him for 2 qb run plays right up the middle. Really odd play calls. Seems like they are pulling him again for this short yardage play.
Caught them off guard with the pass--still hate subbing out the QB
The starter finished the drive nicely. If NDSU can get a stop today it will get interesting
 
Buffs got the stop but we're offside. Then NDSU got away with a flagrant hold.

OK by me. I'm rooting for NDSU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LandoComando
Caught them off guard with the pass--still hate subbing out the QB
The starter finished the drive nicely. If NDSU can get a stop today it will get interesting
Great to see I’m in mid season form with my horrendous in game hot takes!
 
Buffs got the stop but we're offside. Then NDSU got away with a flagrant hold.

OK by me. I'm rooting for NDSU.
They've been consistent--on the second down run there was a huge hold by Colorado--as long as they call it the same way I'm not complaining.
 
What's more surprising?
  • That NDSU got a stop?
  • That the Buffs went for it on their own 35 yd line?
 
Colorado comes up with a stop and Sanders kid just levels a WR for no reason--great discipline
 
Colorado has quite a team. Sanders & Hunter are both $million NIL players. A few other good players. The rest are marginal D1.

I wonder if there is much resentment between the haves and have nots.
 
Colorado has quite a team. Sanders & Hunter are both $million NIL players. A few other good players. The rest are marginal D1.

I wonder if there is much resentment between the haves and have nots.
It's just weird with guys like TO roaming the sideline they aren't having more success landing transfers. I mean, I don't think Prime is a guy I'd want to play for but I'm shocked 18 years olds are running to them.

And Hunter is special
 
It's just weird with guys like TO roaming the sideline they aren't having more success landing transfers. I mean, I don't think Prime is a guy I'd want to play for but I'm shocked 18 years olds are running to them.

And Hunter is special
Hunter is amazing (the Sanders kids I can do without). Seems like a good kid too. It’s a shame he’s gonna burn all the tread on his tires playing for Prime. I think he’s played every snap this game. Just insane for a top 10 pick. Hope he doesn’t get a serious injury because of all the use.
 
Hunter is amazing (the Sanders kids I can do without). Seems like a good kid too. It’s a shame he’s gonna burn all the tread on his tires playing for Prime. I think he’s played every snap this game. Just insane for a top 10 pick. Hope he doesn’t get a serious injury because of all the use.
Agreed--sometimes you have to tell the kid it's not in his best interest to play that much
 
20-17 at the half--long way to go and Sanders might throw for 600 but this Colorado D is pathetic
 
Crazy bounce on the pick but that was an absolutely horrible throw by Sanders or terrible route as well.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT