Thanks for the background, it would be helpful to quantitatively discuss "rates" and "probability" if you can and source it. This is how better decisions are made.
For example, my best estimate counting the number of deaths and known positives reported in this thread is approximately 35 deaths of 220 known positives with probably over half spending time in the hospital for it. This is an estimate based on many using the terms "a few" which I took to be 3 or 4 and the like.
Anyway, 35 of 220 is a death rate of 16%. Below are the CDC's published survivability rates.
Ages 0-19: 99.997%
Ages 20-49: 99.98%
Ages 50-69: 99.5%
Ages 70+: 94.6%
So as you can see, our board's known cases represent about 3 times higher death rate than the 70+ age category as reported by the CDC and about 32 times higher than the 50 - 69 age group that appears to be aligned with the average of the deaths reported here in this thread.
Now I wouldn't individually say anyone here is making things up and I am very sorry for any and all of the losses anyone may have experienced. But it is clear that our collective reporting of deaths and cases on this board of about 32 times higher death rate than the CDC reports for our average age of death reported is not highly probable. My guess is that many of us have been told anecdotal stories and we simply believe them because we have no real reason not to believe them. Except that in the aggregate, our reports are of a death rate 32 times higher than the CDC is reporting. If we are willing to believe that then perhaps we may also believe it's punishment on the Penn State community for Sandusky's crimes.