Does any team have better upper weights than Mizzou?
- Thread starter jammenz
- Start date
Bored?
Either way, Merry Christmas, and may Santa not pick up your gift when he stops in Shamokin.
Not sure I'd put Romero in that sentence, but it's hard to believe anybody has a better 165-197 in the country. I'd say 125-149 too, but that stretch is probably second to the team covered by the message board I'm currently posting on. 
Possibly Iowa if they can get something out of 174,
The Hawkeyes may disagree on that 125-149 sentiment as wellNot sure I'd put Romero in that sentence, but it's hard to believe anybody has a better 165-197 in the country. I'd say 125-149 too, but that stretch is probably second to the team covered by the message board I'm currently posting on.
If they get Grothus competitive at 141, you may be right there. With 165, however, disagree wholeheartedly. The Hawkeye 165, whomever it is, could very well be sitting at home watching Nationals on the ESPN family of networks.
I can't speak for all Hawkeyes but 125-149 I would definitely favor Iowa over Missouri. That shouldn't even be a real comparison. PSU/Iowa by far have the best lower weights this year.
And the comment about getting something out of 174 is kind of confusing, I assume you mean 165?
And the comment about getting something out of 174 is kind of confusing, I assume you mean 165?
Mizzou's 149 could definitely go with Iowas honestly I think Mayes could be in the contender conversation as well
Rutgers, who I am a fan of, won 3 of 5 against Nebraska upper weights and lost one in overtime.
Per your rankings I would agree. But if you look at Wrestling Report Huskers take 4 of 5:
Wilson 8...... dec Lewis 11
Barnes 7..... dec Butler 9
Dudley 6..... dec Miklus 7
Cox 2...........dec Studebaker 11
Jensen 21....dec Romero ur
