Because he's considered one of the greatest corners, if not players, in the history of the NFL who had success at the FCS level who came in with a plan at Colorodo. Some want to see it work. Others want him to feel. Not difficult to understand. People should care about all programs as any being successful impacts the program you root for.If so, can anybody tell me why they care?
Hasn't the highest level of college football always been the haves vs the have not? It's why it needs to be broken up into tiers honestlyLoved him in college and agree, was one of the best corners ever in the NFL. An absolute incredible athlete.
What I don't like ... going forward I will have trouble giving any coach credit for succeeding with one of the best teams money can buy. At least before, you recruited and developed players and they worked out or not. Your coaching staff did that--you did all the work--reaped what you sowed.
Nowadays, schools are developing and molding youngsters into really good players and then other schools are scooping them up. And yes, big time tampering is going on to make a lot of that happen. At least in the NFL, the salary cap and tampering penalties kind of helped balance things out--even up the playing field. The NCAA is hard broke and Deion is milking it to the max.
So no ... not a fan of dumping over half of an existing team and then buying a nearly brand new one. Doesn't say much except he's at a school now that's willing to totally prostitute themselves to get ahead. That part sours my stomach. I've never been a "win at any cost" kind of dude. Am I cheering for or will I be a fan of Colorado ... just not going to happen.
Will he succeed? Nowadays ... most all schools with big money will. Doesn't mean he's a great coach ... just means he's leading the best team his school's NIL machine can buy. Kinda like Georgia, Bama and the SEC--great deep teams with outstanding players. Frankly, most coaches at the D1 level would succeed with those rosters.
So yeah ... I'm totally for all schools being successful. But apparently that's not going to happen anymore without controls in place to keep the playing field level.
This is basically fair but is it worse "openly cutting guys" as opposed to just running them off?I never cared for him as a player -- he's one of the worst tackling DBs ever. Super talented athlete, obviously.
I didn't care for his coaching stint at JSU. He talked up how great HBCU's are then fled after two years to P5. His whole "HBCU athletes are disrespected by the NFL" platform is ridiculous. The NFL finds talent where ever it is (and it's not like it's a racial thing, as is obvious by NFL rosters). The only reason HBCU athletes might not get the same attention is because it is obvious they do not play against the same level of competition as P5 programs. So you can look great against Howard, but look mediocre against top tier talent.
As for what he is doing at Colorado, time will tell if he succeeds. My guess that the guys he brought with him from JSU are in for a rude awakening (see paragraph above) and will take at least a year to adjust to P5 size, speed, strength, talent. I am also not a fan of his roster management. Openly cutting guys who were obvious contributors (including some legacy players) doesn't sit well with me. If his "experiment" doesn't work, Colorado is going to be screwed for a long, long time.
Depends how you mean "running them off". There are guys who are stuck as third string their entire careers who coaches have conversations with like "You are good enough to play college ball, but you aren't going to get to here. We'd be happy to help you find somewhere else to land" vs guys who played a lot last year (and contributed) who "Coach Prime" told to hit the bricks.This is basically fair but is it worse "openly cutting guys" as opposed to just running them off?
What if the experiment does work? And if it doesn't work are they going to be any worse than they were before he arrived?
You can hype up HBCU and still leave for a better job. That's the only criticism I don't believe is remotely fair
He basically told everyone that left Colorado other than about 5 they weren't going to play. Contributing a lot on a horrible team doesn't make mean you'll contribute now as he finds better athletes. I know everyone has different approaches and that's fine but I'd rather a coach run a kid off then keep someone around they don't want. That's not good for either partyDepends how you mean "running them off". There are guys who are stuck as third string their entire careers who coaches have conversations with like "You are good enough to play college ball, but you aren't going to get to here. We'd be happy to help you find somewhere else to land" vs guys who played a lot last year (and contributed) who "Coach Prime" told to hit the bricks.
Regarding HBCU, IIRC he spoke up for how those programs need more resources, how important they are to black athletes, and how much he believed in the experience. He believed in it so much he bolted after 2 years and is poaching HBCU kids to a P5 program.
It's bonkers to me that he thinks he can make that assessment before spring ball though (recall, he announced that as soon as he arrived). Not getting to know the kids and seeing what they have to offer (maybe they have talent but needed better coaching?) seems ridiculously short sighted.He basically told everyone that left Colorado other than about 5 they weren't going to play. Contributing a lot on a horrible team doesn't make mean you'll contribute now as he finds better athletes. I know everyone has different approaches and that's fine but I'd rather a coach run a kid off then keep someone around they don't want. That's not good for either party
But he left because of the lack of resources which supports his stance.
I'm not a fan of him. Never have been. But a lot of the criticism seems unwarranted. Coaches always hype their current program then many leave. That's what you do to recruit.
I watched Colorado a few times last year--there wasn't much talent.It's bonkers to me that he thinks he can make that assessment before spring ball though (recall, he announced that as soon as he arrived). Not getting to know the kids and seeing what they have to offer (maybe they have talent but needed better coaching?) seems ridiculously short sighted.
In terms of criticism, I don't like his approach. Maybe it works and then win a NC in the next 3 years. Maybe it crashes and burns. We will see. But I still won't like the approach.
Hows it going to work? A team full of kids who didn't pan out at other schools? A bunch of misfit backups. And he's not recruiting all that great either. They are going to be horrible.Is the real concern that if this works this will become the new normal of college football?
Did the word "if" confuse you?Hows it going to work? A team full of kids who didn't pan out at other schools? A bunch of misfit backups. And he's not recruiting all that great either. They are going to be horrible.
No way they win 4Did the word "if" confuse you?
Stranger things have worked out and the Pac XII isn't exactly elite. They go 4-8 this year it's a huge improvement over 1-11.
I mean, if they win 2 they're twice as good but I don't think it's impossible for them to win 4. The Pac XII is trash.No way they win 4
They will be so bad
Loved him in college and agree, was one of the best corners ever in the NFL. An absolute incredible athlete.
What I don't like ... going forward I will have trouble giving any coach credit for succeeding with one of the best teams money can buy. At least before, you recruited and developed players and they worked out or not. Your coaching staff did that--you did all the work--reaped what you sowed.
Nowadays, schools are developing and molding youngsters into really good players and then other schools are scooping them up. And yes, big time tampering is going on to make a lot of that happen. At least in the NFL, the salary cap and tampering penalties kind of helped balance things out--even up the playing field. The NCAA is hard broke and Deion is milking it to the max.
So no ... not a fan of dumping over half of an existing team and then buying a nearly brand new one. Doesn't say much except he's at a school now that's willing to totally prostitute themselves to get ahead. That part sours my stomach. I've never been a "win at any cost" kind of dude. Am I cheering for or will I be a fan of Colorado ... just not going to happen.
Will he succeed? Nowadays ... most all schools with big money will. Doesn't mean he's a great coach ... just means he's leading the best team his school's NIL machine can buy. Kinda like Georgia, Bama and the SEC--great deep teams with outstanding players. Frankly, most coaches at the D1 level would succeed with those rosters.
So yeah ... I'm totally for all schools being successful. But apparently that's not going to happen anymore without controls in place to keep the playing field level.
To be fair, this is allowed by the rules today, whether we like them or not. Deion at least told players when he arrived what was coming, I think. I don't like everything they've done there, but I'll be paying attention.Loved him in college and agree, was one of the best corners ever in the NFL. An absolute incredible athlete.
What I don't like ... going forward I will have trouble giving any coach credit for succeeding with one of the best teams money can buy. At least before, you recruited and developed players and they worked out or not. Your coaching staff did that--you did all the work--reaped what you sowed.
Nowadays, schools are developing and molding youngsters into really good players and then other schools are scooping them up. And yes, big time tampering is going on to make a lot of that happen. At least in the NFL, the salary cap and tampering penalties kind of helped balance things out--even up the playing field. The NCAA is hard broke and Deion is milking it to the max.
So no ... not a fan of dumping over half of an existing team and then buying a nearly brand new one. Doesn't say much except he's at a school now that's willing to totally prostitute themselves to get ahead. That part sours my stomach. I've never been a "win at any cost" kind of dude. Am I cheering for or will I be a fan of Colorado ... just not going to happen.
Will he succeed? Nowadays ... most all schools with big money will. Doesn't mean he's a great coach ... just means he's leading the best team his school's NIL machine can buy. Kinda like Georgia, Bama and the SEC--great deep teams with outstanding players. Frankly, most coaches at the D1 level would succeed with those rosters.
So yeah ... I'm totally for all schools being successful. But apparently that's not going to happen anymore without controls in place to keep the playing field level.
Not enough to start a thread about itIf so, can anybody tell me why they care?