LOL... Yes, cultists like NJ, Paoli, 2lying... The praise their God Joe Biden and his ever so fine a human being son...
https://www.wsj.com/articles/hunter...hapley-burisma-5f891342?mod=opinion_lead_pos9
The federal investigation into the young Mr. Biden’s taxes and financial dealings began in 2018. It’s been punctuated by the surfacing of lurid laptop photos of Hunter taking drugs and cavorting with women in the nude. There have also been occasional teases about Joe Biden’s alleged involvement in Hunter’s business, including the never explained email from a business partner saying 10% of a deal with a Chinese company would be “held by H for the big guy.”
That was the gradual part.
Suddenly came last week. First was the testimony before Congress—under oath and in public—by whistleblowers Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler. These career Internal Revenue Service investigators proffered details about how the president’s political appointees sabotaged their investigation, tipping off Hunter’s lawyers about searches and interviews, forbidding questions about “the big guy,” and running out the clock on the statute of limitations for the more-serious tax issues involving Burisma payments.
Then, just a day after the whistleblowers testified, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa) dropped another bombshell: A Federal Bureau of Investigation FD-1023 form memorializing a trusted source’s claim that Burisma founder Mykola Zlochevsky alleged he’d been “coerced” into paying Joe and Hunter Biden $5 million each. News outlets dutifully reported that the form was “unverified” (a qualifier absent from most reporting on the infamous Steele dossier).
But saying the information is unverified raises the key question: What steps, if any, did the FBI take to verify these allegations?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/hunter...hapley-burisma-5f891342?mod=opinion_lead_pos9
The federal investigation into the young Mr. Biden’s taxes and financial dealings began in 2018. It’s been punctuated by the surfacing of lurid laptop photos of Hunter taking drugs and cavorting with women in the nude. There have also been occasional teases about Joe Biden’s alleged involvement in Hunter’s business, including the never explained email from a business partner saying 10% of a deal with a Chinese company would be “held by H for the big guy.”
That was the gradual part.
Suddenly came last week. First was the testimony before Congress—under oath and in public—by whistleblowers Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler. These career Internal Revenue Service investigators proffered details about how the president’s political appointees sabotaged their investigation, tipping off Hunter’s lawyers about searches and interviews, forbidding questions about “the big guy,” and running out the clock on the statute of limitations for the more-serious tax issues involving Burisma payments.
Then, just a day after the whistleblowers testified, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa) dropped another bombshell: A Federal Bureau of Investigation FD-1023 form memorializing a trusted source’s claim that Burisma founder Mykola Zlochevsky alleged he’d been “coerced” into paying Joe and Hunter Biden $5 million each. News outlets dutifully reported that the form was “unverified” (a qualifier absent from most reporting on the infamous Steele dossier).
But saying the information is unverified raises the key question: What steps, if any, did the FBI take to verify these allegations?
