Centre County judicial system and government is a joke. It certainly seems there were higher powers pulling strings behind the scenes which made this trial happen so quickly. Amendola used to be the go to lawyer to get you out of trouble with the law in Centre County. I would like to see JS get a new trial to hopefully expose all the other corrupt sick bastards in the county that used PSU and the football program to hide their corruption. There are just way too many things that just don't add up about this entire fiasco.
FC: JS requests new trial
- Thread starter LundyPSU
- Start date
- Status
Regardless of the specifics of JS; without a fair trial, guilt cannot be determined, period. A fair trial, by a jury of your peers, is what stands between the USA and tyranny.
The evidence presented against JS was overwhelming. It was so overwhelming, it made it appear that Joe and the rest had to be blind, or worse yet, enabling.
We know that the prosecutors were unethical, at least, and perhaps worked outside the law. Having worked with at risk youth, it is a very common practice (far more than "not unusual) for these kinds of claims to be made. When you add in a substantial financial incentive, JS being innocent is far from being a fantastical fairy-tail.
Specific to JS, I am 80% certain that MM was encouraged to embolden his testimony, which made the rest seem guilty.
All trials need to be fair, period. If JS's was not, start over. I can only hope and pray that the judge who reviews this does so with clean eyes and has only justice in mind no matter how he/she rules.
The evidence presented against JS was overwhelming. It was so overwhelming, it made it appear that Joe and the rest had to be blind, or worse yet, enabling.
We know that the prosecutors were unethical, at least, and perhaps worked outside the law. Having worked with at risk youth, it is a very common practice (far more than "not unusual) for these kinds of claims to be made. When you add in a substantial financial incentive, JS being innocent is far from being a fantastical fairy-tail.
Specific to JS, I am 80% certain that MM was encouraged to embolden his testimony, which made the rest seem guilty.
All trials need to be fair, period. If JS's was not, start over. I can only hope and pray that the judge who reviews this does so with clean eyes and has only justice in mind no matter how he/she rules.
By the way, I have been on here for years. Don't post often but read a lot. I did nothing when the switch happened to carry my history over as I am not concerned about that type of thing. I have a life and don't measure my worth by such stupid things as amount of posts or size of my privates.
Because a few think that in some fantasy land Jerry was actually innocent and this will be the ultimate vindication in the back of their sick little heads. The problem is he is guilty and will die in prison, but they want to hold on to this for some reason because some nutbag can tear apart the witnesses like a defense lawyer would so they buy into it. They blabber about a fair trial, but it's most BS to be honest. They think they will somehow be vindicated when Jerry is free which is never going to happen. Go to other PSU sites and see if there are any little free Jerry brigades around....they don't exist. Thankfully it is a tiny minority that are playing this free jerry card. This appeal will get denied or even if it happens, Jerry will still die in jail as he will be found guilty again.
Last edited:
Why are you afraid of a fair trial? You want the world to work like this board where you can insult those you disagree with and remove their points of view. Insecure and immature are two words that come to mind immediately. Quick......call me a name! Insult me. Then remove my post. Ha ha. What a joke
Typical response. Because one questions censorship and may at least listen to another side of the story, they're in the "Free Jerry" camp. You are a sanctimonious jerk.
Odd those convicted never get a fair trial or all had bad attorneys. Alrighty then.
What, you can't stand behind your opinion? I can, Jerry is a serial child molester and I can say that without hesitation. You're a naive idiot that thinks Jerry will somehow vindicate all of the PSU wrongs. Don't hold your breath on that one or keep hiding behind he was wronged in court.
The situation you described actually would not fit within the bounds of the Excited Utterance Exception to the Hearsay rule, so no, that's not really the precedent that was set.
For that reason, I expect the political forces will deny sandusky a new trial. As you said, expect nothing to happen.
Why can't you make a simple distinction? Saying he deserves a new trial and saying he is innocent are two different things. Some of us have clearly said that we believe he is guilty of some of the charges but that he did not receive a fair trial. Every person in the U.S. deserves a fair trial. This is a right that we have.
Many of us have wanted nothing more than the truth in this mess. Sandusky being granted a new trial would obviously support that effort.
Look, I'm, one of those who thinks Jerry is where he belongs. But I want him to get there the *right* way. I am not sure that happened.
- Status
