FC: Richard Jewell movie (by Clint Eastwood)

[BobPSU92]

I just saw a preview. How will freeh be portrayed?

 

[artsandletters]

Depending on the screenplay Freeh may sue. Hope so.

 

[PearlSUJam]

I just saw a preview. How will freeh be portrayed?

Hopefully like the one eyed zipper snake that he is.

 

[interrobang]

Freeh's not even in the movie and I doubt he's even mentioned

 

[BobPSU92]

Freeh's not even in the movie and I doubt he's even mentioned

Seriously? How can you have a movie about Jewell without freeh?

 

[Player2BNamedL8r]

I just saw a preview. How will freeh be portrayed?

Here’s the actor they picked to play him...

 

[BobPSU92]

Here’s the actor they picked to play him...

Not Al Pacino?

 

[BBrown]

I just saw a preview. How will freeh be portrayed?

I can't see it being favorable. Saw the clip as well and thought it looked pretty good.

 

[joeparules]

Not Al Pacino?

You mean that isn’t a picture of Pacino?

 

[interrobang]

I can't see this movie doing well at the box office. Just such a niche story.

 

[anon_xdc8rmuek44eq]

Didn’t see ‘Freeh’ listed by name in the cast per IMDB, but there are a few FBI agents.

 

[wbcincy]

Seriously? How can you have a movie about Jewell without freeh?

Because he likely had no on the ground role in it. He oversaw the organization that screwed Jewell, but that doesn’t mean he actively did anything interesting for a film.

 

[Safety Blitz]

Here’s the actor they picked to play him...

The photo I saw was from the other end.

 

[BobPSU92]

Didn’t see ‘Freeh’ listed by name in the cast per IMDB, but there are a few FBI agents.

Thanks. Ridiculous if they don’t have freeh in this movie.

 

[nits74]

Because he likely had no on the ground role in it. He oversaw the organization that screwed Jewell, but that doesn’t mean he actively did anything interesting for a film.

He's never done anything interesting in his entire life.

 

[Chickenman Testa]

I can't see this movie doing well at the box office. Just such a niche story.

Yeah - no one cares about government overreach and malfeasance, especially when it goes hand in hand with a willing press.

 

[91Joe95]

Because he likely had no on the ground role in it. He oversaw the organization that screwed Jewell, but that doesn’t mean he actively did anything interesting for a film.

He was as bad, and as important and integral to what happened, as anyone in that "investigation." You simply cannot tell the story without him.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.vanityfair.com/magazine/1997/02/brenner199702/amp