ADVERTISEMENT

Federal investigators' findings in Sandusky case near release

Incorrect. There was no imminent threat to any student or employee as cited above.
They send out text warnings for alleged rapes that happened weeks prior and where they know who the perpetrator is. They have been ultra cautious with this.
 
noob....it's pnnylion part 50. He gets banned and just gets a new handle because he has some serious issues.
My favorite thing is that he tells people he doesn't agree with to go back to PennLive, but then posts threads about PennLive articles. I wonder what he tells the commentators in the PennLive articles that he doesn't agree with... maybe to go back to BWI?
 
  • Like
Reactions: LaJolla Lion
My favorite thing is that he tells people he doesn't agree with to go back to PennLive, but then posts threads about PennLive articles. I wonder what he tells the commentators in the PennLive articles that he doesn't agree with... maybe to go back to BWI?


You know what I tell them, they're the idiots they appear to be.
 
My favorite thing is that he tells people he doesn't agree with to go back to PennLive, but then posts threads about PennLive articles. I wonder what he tells the commentators in the PennLive articles that he doesn't agree with... maybe to go back to BWI?
You can bet that it doesn't matter what he tells them as they are quite familiar with his verbal vomit and pay little or no attention.
 
My favorite thing is that he tells people he doesn't agree with to go back to PennLive, but then posts threads about PennLive articles. I wonder what he tells the commentators in the PennLive articles that he doesn't agree with... maybe to go back to BWI?
He's very odd. I'll just leave it at that.
 
noob....it's pnnylion part 50. He gets banned and just gets a new handle because he has some serious issues.
Thanks. My mistake.

There was no reference to excrement, which is usually the tell-tale sign of a pnnylion post.
 
In addition to Victims 2 and 8 who didn't testify but who other witnesses saw abused in PSU showers, Victims 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 testified that they were molested in the Penn State showers in the Lasch Building and/or the East Building.

I swear, the Tom McAndrew Board does exist in an alternate universe.

http://deadspin.com/5889777/eight-o...ictims-claim-they-were-molested-on-psu-campus

Again... not sure why your focus is anywhere but the kids. If you want to ignore the failings of the DPW/CYS/TSM, at least provide a link that says what you claim it says. The only testimony discussed at your link is that of MM.

If you would like to leave your alternate universe and join us, that would be cool.
 
Hold the phone! It wasn't Genaro and apologies were made... (Google Search fail-he came up for a Bellefonte byline and that info is 3 years old). When I find the name that belongs here I'll let you know... AP loves to hide who writes this stuff.

Plus this is another article not the Clery one. This is the "AP" version of the MMQ v PSU Whistleblower trial date announcement. You wouldn't know that from the headline OR almost the entire article... smh

http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/347...ate-Abuse/id-89f0c02eef274bc0a1319e4129bcb703




@Tom McAndrew Could you please explain why important links to the context of a post "disappear" and simply say "Tweet" all of a sudden? The stalker @PSUEDOTMFR I have on Twitter is using the sudden lack of this information when they troll this board for ammo to harass me again... And Genaro Armas is falling for their crap, emboldening the internet stalker to come out of hiding and initiate another attack on a female. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
I haven't a clue, but then again I'm not 100% sure what you're asking about.

If you can provide me with more clarity, I'll see if I can figure it out.
Occasionally someone will lift someone else's tweets (or put their own tweets in a post) because it's the easiest way to share a picture of a document or a conversation on the same topic instead of having to do the work in two places on a current event.

Sometimes a day or so later the media is lost and it simply says "tweet".

Regarding the account that trolls here and one other social media site to harass me elsewhere, that topic was covered fully in the "simons96" thread. I'm not sure if you ever read it, but more info is there if you need it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jansmuts
Occasionally someone will lift someone else's tweets (or put their own tweets in a post) because it's the easiest way to share a picture of a document or a conversation on the same topic instead of having to do the work in two places on a current event.

Sometimes a day or so later the media is lost and it simply says "tweet".

I have absolutely no idea what causes this.

Regarding the account that trolls here and one other social media site to harass me elsewhere, that topic was covered fully in the "simons96" thread. I'm not sure if you ever read it, but more info is there if you need it.

I did not read that thread all that closely. I'll try to go back and see if I can see what you're alluding to. I can't do so today, and I can't promise that I'll get to it on Wednesday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nellie R
I have absolutely no idea what causes this.



I did not read that thread all that closely. I'll try to go back and see if I can see what you're alluding to. I can't do so today, and I can't promise that I'll get to it on Wednesday.
Thank you! Obviously on your own timetable. GOCUBSGO FlyTheW
 
Occasionally someone will lift someone else's tweets (or put their own tweets in a post) because it's the easiest way to share a picture of a document or a conversation on the same topic instead of having to do the work in two places on a current event.

Sometimes a day or so later the media is lost and it simply says "tweet".

Regarding the account that trolls here and one other social media site to harass me elsewhere, that topic was covered fully in the "simons96" thread. I'm not sure if you ever read it, but more info is there if you need it.
I could be wrong, but I believe I have seen that happen in the past when a tweet was deleted.
 
I could be wrong, but I believe I have seen that happen in the past when a tweet was deleted.
I'm afraid that's not it. All of them were mine. Unfortunately anyone can take them and place them elsewhere when you let your account be "open" for anyone to read if they wish. It's a risk I'm willing to take to get information out for the normal people of the world to inform themselves. ESPECIALLY on information to learn about child predators.

I never deleted any of those tweets, I rarely do so people can follow the entire conversation if they want to and not cherry-pick one or two out of context.

I'm thinking it might have happened when I had to "lock" my account because of the creeper/stalker resurfacing again. I wouldn't know tho. I've seen it happen on Wensilver's before. Maybe she can enlighten. She's had to lock her Twitter before because of perverts and creepers as well.
 
Last edited:
I'm thinking it might have happened when I had to "lock" my account because of the creeper/stalker resurfacing again. I wouldn't know tho. I've seen it happen on Wensilver's before

FWIW - yes, I did have to make my Twitter profile private for a spell, because I had a "fan" over on PennLive that would creep my TL & scamper back to the PL comment section like that Messenger girl at the 8th grade Mean Girls lunch table sucking up to the Queen Bee.

Meh.

So yes, if you link a Tweet from a private account - it shows up as [tweet] here.
 
I would have liked instead to read a story stating this:

Nearly five years after they began scouring Second Mile records, federal investigators are close to releasing findings about the charity's adherence to mandated child protection procedures in the years leading up to their Founder & Executive Director's multi-count indictment for child sexual abuse of charity clients.
Need to add the following to your story stated above:

Also in this investigation is a renewed focus on why the State Protection Agencies who annually reviewed all Second Mile activities knowingly permitted the Charity to shred its operating records covering the 10+ year period in which Sandusky's abuse of TSM children was reported.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT