I missed it--can you elaborate?
Karen said something to the effect of "isn't it true Penn State is planning to broadcast an event live on Rokfin?"
I missed it--can you elaborate?
Which is funny, because she's been the only competent counsel of the three named parties. (Mr. Hayes was Mr. Floreani's personal counsel)Rokfin counsel trying to intimidate with double cameras.
No archive of the live stream yet. My guess is it’ll show up tomorrow. here is the channel:Is there a URL for today's hearing?
Does FloKaren follow this board, or do you have more content on the topic elsewhere?I listened to the opening arguments about whether to shut down the stream, I'll have that up tomorrow. Pretty sure Karen is referring to me where she says 'someone claiming to be a lawyer who says you (the judge) can't do anything about it because you don't own the copyright.' That's grossly misrepresenting my rather nuanced point, but my expectations of Karen were low enough that I can't pretend to be disappointed. If practicing law was like playing the piano, Karen would be banging the keys with her fists. They're just throwing everything at the wall and hoping something sticks. Lots of noise, none of it music.
Listen to the rest of it, and she's like playing the violin with a hacksaw.my expectations of Karen were low enough that I can't pretend to be disappointed. If practicing law was like playing the piano, Karen would be banging the keys with her fists. They're just throwing everything at the wall and hoping something sticks. Lots of noise, none of it music.
I think it was probably this board. I wrote up a long-ish description to accompany the YouTube video of the hearing where I made some of the same arguments I've already made here, basically trying to preempt anticipated takedown bases, so if it is taken down those arguments are part of the record.Does FloKaren follow this board, or do you have more content on the topic elsewhere?
Yeah, but what if practicing law were like wrestling? What would Karen be doing?... If practicing law was like playing the piano, Karen would be banging the keys with her fists ...
And if practicing law were like practicing law, would Karen be asking OJ to try on the glove?... If practicing law was like playing the piano, Karen would be banging the keys with her fists ...
She'd be playing the foil to Willie's Jason Nolf.Yeah, but what if practicing law were like wrestling? What would Karen be doing?
I think it was probably this board. I wrote up a long-ish description to accompany the YouTube video of the hearing where I made some of the same arguments I've already made here, basically trying to preempt anticipated takedown bases, so if it is taken down those arguments are part of the record.
That's grossly misrepresenting my rather nuanced point
I think she's referring to this post in particular, where it's easy enough to infer that I'm a lawyer. And that post contains the same arguments she mischaracterized in court.And your description didn't talk about being a lawyer right? Which is funny since Karen was asking if Willie was getting advice from twitter during last week's hearing...
From rereading your post after hearing FloKaren's arguments, I can see that her college taught that innovative new english class, creative reading. How do judges put up w/ that kind of crap? I'd be throwing everyone in jail for contempt constantly....I think she's referring to this post in particular, where it's easy enough to infer that I'm a lawyer. And that post contains the same arguments she mischaracterized in court.
I think she's referring to this post in particular, where it's easy enough to infer that I'm a lawyer. And that post contains the same arguments she mischaracterized in court.
Judges put up with a lot of bad faith and are generally inured to it. What Karen's doing isn't really far outside of ordinary practice. Like I've already suggested, this is only nominally an employment contract dispute and far more so an antitrust dispute with Willie as a proxy in order that Flo can kill a key competitor to its business model, which competition would greatly benefit the wrestling-fan public. This sort of fight happens in all sorts of industries and all sorts of Karens are there to help secure monopolies at the expense of the public.From rereading your post after hearing FloKaren's arguments, I can see that her college taught that innovative new english class, creative reading. How do judges put up w/ that kind of crap? I'd be throwing everyone in jail for contempt constantly....
Here is trial video of Willie, Karen, and her Monopolist client: #firemanscarry... all sorts of Karens are there to help secure monopolies at the expense of the public.
I'm not the biggest fan of Willie but it was very tough for me to see him break down yesterday. It's pretty apparent how much he cares for the sport and how much this lawsuit is weighing on him.
End of the day, the guy really has a passion for this and Flo is trying to take it away from him. Regardless of any noncompete clause, it's just petty, he's hardly pulling some King's Ransom for doing this.
It's great seeing the wrestling community rally behind him.
I know I was ~50% likely to subscribe to Rokfin before yesterday, and am nearing 90% after yesterday (it will be 100% if NLWC gets the cut of revenue).Agreed.
The ironic part is basically the reason they're doing this is to try to kill the competition and if anything they're helping them (both by likely resulting in viewers having a lesser opinion of Flo as well as doing things like help get the word out about the alleged upcoming NLWC event).
And don't forget what seems to be getting lost in this is that Mark is suing his own brother...
I listened while focused on other things yesterday, but to me, it seemed like he broke down from the weight of all of it in the middle of a rather mundane portion of his testimony. Maybe there was a "trigger" but I think he just broke in the moment. It was tough to watch. If this was a court of public opinion, Flo would have no hope.What does Willie break down about? I don't like his politics he shares on Twitter (whatever), but his passion for this great sport make me want to subscribe to his Rokfin.
I think she's referring to this post in particular, where it's easy enough to infer that I'm a lawyer. And that post contains the same arguments she mischaracterized in court.
If that paid as well as lawyering, that's all anyone would see me as.Some of us only see you as a photographer with a Press Pass!
Didn’t someone say Karen mentioned Jammenz? ...... Maybe there was a "trigger" ...
I listened while focused on other things yesterday, but to me, it seemed like he broke down from the weight of all of it in the middle of a rather mundane portion of his testimony. Maybe there was a "trigger" but I think he just broke in the moment. It was tough to watch. If this was a court of public opinion, Flo would have no hope.
I don't think this was about Flo Karen being dismissive of his work.I think it was a little bit of both. Basically, IMO Karen was saying if we used Willie’s interpretation of “future wrestling events,” then there was no point In getting the injunction, effectively claiming that all he did was articles and rankings, which he rightfully took offense to.
I don't think this was about Flo Karen being dismissive of his work.
If there's one thing we know about Willie (other than his recruiting prowess!): as much as he loves the sport itself, he's really about the people in the sport.
Flo Karen is threatenening to cut him off from the people he so clearly loves. And that's rightly emotional for him.