Flo BIG10 Rankings
- Thread starter ChinWhip
- Start date
When did Flo put out BIG rankings for this season? I ask because you didn't post a link and I can't find them.
I’d like to point out that they appear to be inconsistent with their “FS results don’t impact our folk rankings” mantra.
www.flowrestling.org
Previewing The Wrestle-Offs For #8 Ohio State - FloWrestling
We preview the wrestle-offs for the Ohio State Buckeyes as the Big Ten powerhouse prepares for the 2021 season.
BREAKING NEWS:
I’d like to point out that they appear to be inconsistent with their “FS results don’t impact our folk rankings” mantra.
In related news:
Water found to be wet upon touch.
www.flowrestling.org
[/QUOTE]
I’d like to point out that they appear to be inconsistent with their “FS results don’t impact our folk rankings” mantra.
In related news:
Water found to be wet upon touch.
Previewing The Wrestle-Offs For #8 Ohio State - FloWrestling
We preview the wrestle-offs for the Ohio State Buckeyes as the Big Ten powerhouse prepares for the 2021 season.
People complaining about preseason rankings:BREAKING NEWS:
I’d like to point out that they appear to be inconsistent with their “FS results don’t impact our folk rankings” mantra.
In related news:
Water found to be wet upon touch.
Previewing The Wrestle-Offs For #8 Ohio State - FloWrestling
We preview the wrestle-offs for the Ohio State Buckeyes as the Big Ten powerhouse prepares for the 2021 season.
People complaining about preseason rankings:
LOL, good one. Preseason rankings are only good for one thing, encouraging discussion. Discussion that does NOT change anything.
If there was toilet paper imprinted with JD’s rankings for sale,I would buy a case then put them on the hanger upside down so they made more sense.
Back off the new guy?? Thats not how this works.
Back off the new guy?? Thats not how this works.
my bad that was a typo. meant to say don't hold back. lay into him both barrels.
and thank you for continuing to read and support FloWrestling dot org. 🙏
That makes 2 things. I would've guessed birdcage liner.
Just saw the thread and title and thought I'd see if there was a way to improve our Big Ten rankings. I'm happy for anyone who enjoys wrestling in whatever manner they choose. I don't get any commissions on new subs
If there is any specific issues with the B10 rankings that anyone wants to mention, that's cool. if not, that's cool too. I will still mercilessly haze JD regardless.
If there is any specific issues with the B10 rankings that anyone wants to mention, that's cool. if not, that's cool too. I will still mercilessly haze JD regardless.
Not related to rankings but if you have a good/connected researcher I would love to know the following questions about the NCAA season. Thanks for your consideration.
1. When is the NCAA going to decide whether 24 or 33 per weight qualify to the NCAA Championships?
2. Are the NCAA pre-allocations using historical data going to be consistent across all weights at every conference? If not, is it up to the national committee or the conference how they want to allocate their total across the weight classes?
3. How is the NCAA's historical data going to take into account the teams that aren't competing in the issuing of allocations? Are they just going to use the percentage of teams not competing or will they factor in how many of the historical bids the EIWA was awarded because of Cornell, etc?
4. What is going on with American, Drexel, Bloomsburg, Cleveland State, George Mason, CSU Bakersfield, and Stanford? We are wrapping up the second weekend of competition and they haven't released a schedule yet.
1. Appears to be heading towards 100%, or 33 per weight class. Read more here; https://ncaaorg.s3.amazonaws.com/committees/d1/compoversig/NOV2020D1COC_Nov18Report.pdf.
2. & 3. Good questions. Below is posted the weight-by-weight average for the Big Ten over the past 5 years. When thinking about all the changes in the past 5 years -- schools entering and leaving D1 wrestling, the Ivy shutting down wrestling for this year (all in the EIWA), etc., simple averages won't work. My guess is there will be weighting of the averages, which is easy enough, but it's purely a guess. For example, 6 of the 17 EIWA teams are Ivy League schools, so the Qualifier Allocation average is multiplied by .65 (65%) or so.
Big Ten Qualifier Allocation averages, past 5 years;
125 - 8.2
133 - 8.0
141 - 8.2
149 - 7.4
157 - 7.8
165 - 8.0
174 - 8.4
184 - 8.4
197 - 6.0
285 - 6.6
Tot - 77.0
4. I believe these to be true;
Drexel's first dual is 1/24,
Cleveland State's first dual is 1/16
George Mason's first dual is 1/24
Cal-Bakersfield's first dual is 1/24
Stanford's first dual is 1/15
Not sure about American or Bloomsburg
