FloSports lawsuit and related info

[El-Jefe]

Martin's video presumes the audience is familiar with the background details but he's too deep in the weeds to be making sense to average viewers.

I'm familiar with the background details (only because I read the litigation docs) and I'm kind of lost as to where he's going.

The backdrop here is a dry fight over access to the books of a small corporation, made slightly less dry by the wealthy inter-family angle. That's not going to move the needle for everyone but that's still the story he needs to tell because it's necessary to understand whatever the new mystery development is.

He'd serve his interests better if he backed way way way up and explained what led to this present moment. Give people some context, because most people have no clue what he's talking about. Assume you're explaining things to a stranger off the street because that's essentially what you're doing when you post a video on Twitter.

Also if he cut his video by about 80%. That video was as if he's in a race to the bottom with Pyles, in terms of blathering.

 

[Cstroke]

Assuming they don't want to pay him out?? Or they do and he's not settling so they keep dicking with him hoping he'll settle just to be away from it?

 

[82bordeaux]

Martin's video presumes the audience is familiar with the background details but he's too deep in the weeds to be making sense to average viewers.

I'm familiar with the background details (only because I read the litigation docs) and I'm kind of lost as to where he's going.

The backdrop here is a dry fight over access to the books of a small corporation, made slightly less dry by the wealthy inter-family angle. That's not going to move the needle for everyone but that's still the story he needs to tell because it's necessary to understand whatever the new mystery development is.

He'd serve his interests better if he backed way way way up and explained what led to this present moment. Give people some context, because most people have no clue what he's talking about. Assume you're explaining things to a stranger off the street because that's essentially what you're doing when you post a video on Twitter.

I do know one thing. Whatever happended was GLARINGLY EGREGIOUS!!!

 

[doubleboots]

I do know one thing. Whatever happended was GLARINGLY EGREGIOUS!!!

 

[tikk10]

Brief update on the above-discussed Flo v Flo shareholder lawsuit. Very basically, Martin lost b/c the discovery demands he and his co-plaintiffs served Flo were defective inasmuch as the demands didn't follow Delaware General Corporation Law to the letter. Martin's attorney served the request but ignored Section 220(b)'s strict requirements--steps that are easy enough to clear if you're paying attention but equally easy to blow through if you don't regularly practice there. It's one of those things that Delaware courts do to discourage Delaware corps from retaining non-Delaware attorneys. Martin has Delaware counsel listed in the court's decision but my guess is that he was using outside counsel when the discovery demands were made years ago. An unfortunate end b/c Martin had better arguments on the merits.

 

[nerfstate]

Brief update on the above-discussed Flo v Flo shareholder lawsuit. Very basically, Martin lost b/c the discovery demands he and his co-plaintiffs served Flo were defective inasmuch as the demands didn't follow Delaware General Corporation Law to the letter. Martin's attorney served the request but ignored Section 220(b)'s strict requirements--steps that are easy enough to clear if you're paying attention but equally easy to blow through if you don't regularly practice there. It's one of those things that Delaware courts do to discourage Delaware corps from retaining non-Delaware attorneys. Martin has Delaware counsel listed in the court's decision but my guess is that he was using outside counsel when the discovery demands were made years ago. An unfortunate end b/c Martin had better arguments on the merits.

He seems unhappy.