Or is it just very good evidence that 41 is the weakest weight class in the nation (by far) top-to-bottom?
Do you understand the process? Serious question, since it's easily explainable.
Your question was "how on earth did they get an allocation of 9 slots?". Again, do you understand? Serious question...which can be answered in one sentence;
...because the B1G had 9 of the top-29 or so wrestlers in the country.
I feel the burn all the way over here.Thank you, you clearly answered both of my questions.
Thank you, you clearly answered both of my questions.
Not sure this will help, let's try these 3 -- RPI, Coaches Ranking, and Win %. And that's all there is to say.
RPI and Coaches Ranking are very subjective (and subject to "bias") as WrestleStat confirms....
The RPI is subjective? You either don't know what the RPI is or you don't know what the word subjective means.
Okay, let me ask you a question - do you really believe TODAY that the B1G has 9 of the absolute best 29 wrestlers @ 41?
Yes, because it is a calculation of your average opponent strength I believe.......winning percentage is "objective". Just because you wrestled on average weaker opposition doesn't objectively suggest or demonstrate a correlation that you are equally weaker and your winning percentage therefore should be discounted.
You deserve a beer for that comment. I literally spit mine out laughing.I feel the burn all the way over here.