With the Hidlay pin on Friday (2/18), Cass getting pinned earlier in the season, and the "other" notable and maybe unexpected falls in history, I wonder what you think about the term "getting caught".
I like to give total credit to the guy getting the pin, as he has just accomplished the ultimate in this sport. At the same time, Cassioppi is not likely to lose to DelGarbino (4-7 this season) if they wrestle again, and I'd give money that others that were pinned would not lose often either.
Problem is imo, saying a wrestler "gets caught" minimizes the opponents accomplishment. Yet it is true, is it not?
I like to give total credit to the guy getting the pin, as he has just accomplished the ultimate in this sport. At the same time, Cassioppi is not likely to lose to DelGarbino (4-7 this season) if they wrestle again, and I'd give money that others that were pinned would not lose often either.
Problem is imo, saying a wrestler "gets caught" minimizes the opponents accomplishment. Yet it is true, is it not?