Do people see the irony in the thing? Stop living in the past, laser focus on the future, the past is gone, it's a new day...that only applies when we're talking about certain people, or removing players' images on banners from the concourses. But then this is what happens when you lie so much you can't keep all your stories straight.
How about a compromise? Display the "retired" numbers at the stadium, but continue to allow the players the honor of wearing them.
Un retire #22, put numbers on the helmets, take names off jerseys, repaint the end zone with the diamonds, hand out marshmallows to the student section during home games, make the players wear suits and ties on road trips, shave all beards, wear mesh jerseys on warm days go to class, get to study hall, get your degree, and be a productive citizen.
It's not complicated people.
My respect for Cappy is huge, however it would be even greater if he would decline the offer at the ceremony and thank everyone for the consideration.Retiring the number was just another perceived slap in the face to all things Joe. It should have never happened. However it would be. Dry difficult to undo it.
The only thing that would work would be if JC himself decided to un- retire it.
Now that the names have come off the jerseys, I started thinking about Penn State having retired #22 in honor of John Cappelletti. It is the first number ever retired by the school. Akeel Lynch will be the last player to wear the number.
I really like John Cappelletti. I respect him. He is Penn State's lone Heisman Trophy winner. His story, meaning his bond with Joey, is special. However, I don't think #22 should be retired in honor of him. It's not the Penn State Way. Cappelletti is a Penn State legend, but there are other ways to honor him. Other players should have the opportunity to build a legacy at Penn State as #22.
The video released this week about Penn State taking the names off the jerseys talks about how "people remember the 22s". Cappelletti wasn't the only good 22. Others have shone wearing that number, but it bothers me to think that after Lynch graduates, there will not be another 22 at Penn State. I don't think Cappelletti should be singled out by having his number retired.
What do you think?
Exactly right. I was at the game a couple years ago when they honored Cappy and the rest of that team at half time. As you said, it was done to placate the fans who were angry about the admins treatment of the program's past. Not surprisingly, it looks like they got it wrong again. As good as Cappy was, I don't think most fans want to single out one player over the rest of the team. And of course, at the ceremony, they introduced the whole team but never mentioned who the coach was.I disagree with the statement that retiring the number was done to honor anything. It was done to try to placate an increasingly hostile fan base due to one colossal screw up after another by our administration.
That said, even if it had been done to honor Cappelletti I would have been against it.
Couldn't agree with you anymore rod - Cappy was a class player and our only Heisman trophy winner but you could be opening up a can of worms that would be hard to close.My respect for Cappy is huge, however it would be even greater if he would decline the offer at the ceremony and thank everyone for the consideration.
No disrespect to John. However, I too am opposed to retiring any player's number as the issue is about team and not the individual.
What makes this decision so incindiary for me is the manner in which it was made.
Dave Joyner decided this almost on his own. He made no effort to survey the letterman. Moreover, he convinced Rod that this was a common practice at other schools. But this decision was motivated by factors I cannot enumerate here.
Of course, Rod's connection to athletics was virtually non-existent even after he was elevated to President.
One day I will share my emails to Rod regarding this matter so that you get a better sense of the administration of athletics under Dave Joyner.
I thought it was dumb when it was announced and I think it is dumb now.Now that the names have come off the jerseys, I started thinking about Penn State having retired #22 in honor of John Cappelletti. It is the first number ever retired by the school. Akeel Lynch will be the last player to wear the number.
I really like John Cappelletti. I respect him. He is Penn State's lone Heisman Trophy winner. His story, meaning his bond with Joey, is special. However, I don't think #22 should be retired in honor of him. It's not the Penn State Way. Cappelletti is a Penn State legend, but there are other ways to honor him. Other players should have the opportunity to build a legacy at Penn State as #22.
The video released this week about Penn State taking the names off the jerseys talks about how "people remember the 22s". Cappelletti wasn't the only good 22. Others have shone wearing that number, but it bothers me to think that after Lynch graduates, there will not be another 22 at Penn State. I don't think Cappelletti should be singled out by having his number retired.
What do you think?
There is no "22" displayed in the stadium as you would expect for a retired number. I wonder if Cappelletti didn't want it displayed.
Probably because it's still an active number.
It's certainly not a huge deal for me either way, but my preference would also be for us not to retire any numbers. Part of the tradition I love is knowing the players in the past that wore a particular number. IMO, seeing a number on a current player makes me remember those former players much more than a retired number does.
Tell that to a Yankee fan.It is a silly honor in general. You can have a day for the people you want to honor but "retiring" the number doesn't really mean anything.
They should name an ice cream after him.