ADVERTISEMENT

Intermat's new rankings are out, with a new #1 team

Hall #7 seems fair. Could of been anywhere from 6-12 based on his mixed results. Nevills up to #4 as expected.

Penn State a couple of points ahead of OSU, but once you factor in bonus I like where they are at. tOSU not really a factor at this point and Iowa takes a hit with Stoll out of the rankings and Clark sliding down to #4. Four horse race down to two.
 
Last edited:
What was OSU's net placement/advancement loss between Brock, Smith, Crutchmer, Weigel and Schafer? Versus our gain between Hall and Nevills?
 
Hall #7 seems fair. Could of been anywhere from 6-12 based on his mixed results. Nevills up to #4 as expected.

Penn State a couple of points ahead of OSU, but once you factor in bonus I like where they are at. tOSU not really a factor at this point and Iowa takes a hit with Stoll out of the rankings and Clark sliding down to #4. Four horse race down to two.
Yeah, they just looked at my rankings from last week ;)
 
Hall #7 seems fair. Could of been anywhere from 6-12 based on his mixed results. Nevills up to #4 as expected.

Penn State a couple of points ahead of OSU, but once you factor in bonus I like where they are at. tOSU not really a factor at this point and Iowa takes a hit with Stoll out of the rankings and Clark sliding down to #4. Four horse race down to two.
Well said!
I was and still am a proponent for pulling the shirt.
NCAA's is a mystical land of fantasy and faireies where the surreal often takes place - what I'm trying to say is that given the inherent variability of results, we need every point we can get. Hall left some points on the table in the Iowa dual. Short time with no escape efforts on two occasions is being addressed - fix that, and we are increasing our point buffer!
 
Last edited:
...
I was and still am a proponent for pulling the shirt.
NCAA's is a mystical land of fantasy and faireies where the surreal often takes place - what I'm trying to say is that given the inherent variability of results, we need every point we can get. Hall left some points on the table in the Iowa dual. Short time with no escape efforts on two occasions is being addressed - fix that, and we are increasing our point buffer.
Good morning, Dropster! FYI, if you're going to test out your new spoof account, you have to switch user to Spy.ker first. ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: pawrestlersintn
I'm imagining 6 or 7 Alias's for now. I'm not sure if I'll use the Dog.Welder one much, but J.ammenz, Spy.ker, and my newest idea, 2.1Guns are probably going to see heavy rotation.
Good morning!☀️

PS: Did we beat Iowa again? I can't get an answer from anyone on this...
 
I'm imagining 6 or 7 Alias's for now. I'm not sure if I'll use the Dog.Welder one much, but J.ammenz, Spy.ker, and my newest idea, 2.1Guns are probably going to see heavy rotation.
Good morning!☀️

PS: Did we beat Iowa again? I can't get an answer from anyone on this...
We did, but the cushion wasn't nearly large enough. I wish we had some more high schoolers that could start early.
 
Hall #7 seems fair. Could of been anywhere from 6-12 based on his mixed results. Nevills up to #4 as expected.

Penn State a couple of points ahead of OSU, but once you factor in bonus I like where they are at. tOSU not really a factor at this point and Iowa takes a hit with Stoll out of the rankings and Clark sliding down to #4. Four horse race down to two.

tOSU still has points to gain in Martin and M. Jordan.
 
I'm imagining 6 or 7 Alias's for now. I'm not sure if I'll use the Dog.Welder one much, but J.ammenz, Spy.ker, and my newest idea, 2.1Guns are probably going to see heavy rotation.
Good morning!☀️

PS: Did we beat Iowa again? I can't get an answer from anyone on this...
just a quick question on alias-is 21Blanks taken?
 
I did a database search for you - Taken:
21Guns
21.Guns
2.1Guns
21GunSalute
21andDrunk
21andNaked
21andHorny

*I think those last three may be the same person, but yes, 21Blanks is open!
Tom would probably get mad at me. I think I will stick with information and a little minor sarcasm every now and then....
 
  • Like
Reactions: dropster45
Tom would probably get mad at me. I think I will stick with information and a little minor sarcasm every now and then....

You're not any tighter with "Tom" than I am. You received the very same email warning from him and here you are, violating that email.
 
It would be a mistake to discount Ohio St.

We are definitely ahead, but if they are healthy and have everyone in place, they have the ability to toss up monster points at NCAAs.
Talk about the stealth approach... no one is talking about them...no pressure...
 
The one good thing in our back pocket with tOSU is it is very unlikely the Red Sea will open up for Myles Martin at 184 this year.

He has a lot of work to do to even AA.

That said, the group of [Snyder + NaTo + Micah + BoJo + Moore] could score 90-100+ all on their own.
 
What was OSU's net placement/advancement loss between Brock, Smith, Crutchmer, Weigel and Schafer? Versus our gain between Hall and Nevills?
In the mysterious world of predicted NCAA points, Advancement and Placement only...Okie State is lower by 10.5 points (using the 5 wrestlers noted above) as compared to last week's InterMat Rankings. PSU is up 7.5 points (for the 2 wrestlers noted).
 
  • Like
Reactions: diggerpup
Poor guns. You guys pick on him more than I do.

Yesterday I got a notification he had quoted my post, but when I clicked on it all it said was something about content by an ignored member. In my book, that in itself makes this board 83% better!

Too bad that he is so obnoxious about his opinions, has such poor reading comprehension, and is so sensitive, because apparently he is a good guesser, and Spyker must keep him well informed.
 
Reading thru the latest Black Shoes Diary article estimating the number of B1G allocations and looking at rankings, tOSU could have a difficult time getting 157 & 165 qualified for NCAAs.

And 125 wont be a slam dunk for tOSU either. Probable but not a lock. Especially with Youtsey coming back late.
 
Cael says 5 positive feedbacks for every 1 negative feedback. You guys are running a huge deficit!

Anyhow, the positive feedbacks should not be too hard. 21 makes some good points.

Regardless of whether the bolded part is true, it is the manner in which the points are made that triggers all the backlash. That, and the number of times the same points are made ad nauseum.
 
Cael says 5 positive feedbacks for every 1 negative feedback. ...
I'm kind of serious. We can applaud and appreciate Cael, but the ultimate praise would be to emulate him. My 2 cents.

Edit: Anyhow, it's just a thought that popped into my head. I'm not trying to make a big deal. I still like joking around and busting each other, in good, appreciative fun.
 
Last edited:
Poor guns. You guys pick on him more than I do.

Yesterday I got a notification he had quoted my post, but when I clicked on it all it said was something about content by an ignored member. In my book, that in itself makes this board 83% better!

Too bad that he is so obnoxious about his opinions, has such poor reading comprehension, and is so sensitive, because apparently he is a good guesser, and Spyker must keep him well informed.


You just broke McAndrew's rules again.
 
I love how you claim to be a decent guy and then go on a message board and continue the crap. Had a seat for you waiting at the Ale House.

I never claim to be decent, actually the opposite.

When did you have a seat at the ale house for me? NYE?? Better go back to your posts and check that out cause my recollection is you said it was a decent place, not an invite for anything.

As to my "Fact". Lighten up, you must enjoy the attention that comes with their online posting/personality or you wouldnt continue with it after the relentless backlash that follows you on every wrestling site. Again, you still remain the only person with a parody account. Which is high marks in my book.

PS- home matches coming up to make good by me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: diggerpup
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT