Nice write up by Willie regarding this topic in the mailbag this morning. He mentions having to strike now utilizing the current momentum coming off the Olympics, and make your voices heard. It's a quick read.
https://intermatwrestle.com/articles/24910
It’s a nice article, sure, but ignores the requirements of Title IX. The NCAA would have to elevate women’s wrestling in D1 to championship/Varsity status to create the “equal opportunity” or balance as ne noted. You cannot do that with a club sport.
The NCAA COULD designate Women’s Wrestling as Olympic Sport which would lower the championship / varsity requirements to 20 teams (I think) instead of 40. That would be similar to Gymnastics. Still….how many D1 programs today? 3? Maybe they would combine divisions but that would create precedent they might not want for other sports say…like Rugby.
Examine history with Hockey. We needed to add Equal Opportunity when Terry Pegula ponied up for Men’s Hockey. That does not mean exact opportunity as in Women’s Hockey, it means equal opportunities for women in sports. Tim Curley and the bean counters wanted to avoid the high cost of a second hockey team and the low attendance. The final four was Hockey, Rowing, Rugby and…brace yourself if this is news to you…Synchronized Skating. Yes, there were three options considered AHEAD of hockey.
There was impetus to build a rowing pool before adding Hockey. Think about that for a minute.
Why Synchronized Skating? Because skating IS popular, people do attend them (quite a bit apparently), there was alrclub teams that include ND and it would utilize the new sheets in Pegula.
We are successful in Rugby so there is logic there. Easy peasy.
Rugby seems to have no interest, or didnt at the time, to move to NCAA oversight so that’s out since it would not be Varsity…and a varsity team is needed for equal opportunity.
Tim met with the NCAA to ask them to move S Skating to varsity status and there was interest, just not quite enough teams and it wouldn’t be ready soon enough to satisfy. The Most preferred option was out.
In the end, Rowing and the investment vs Hockey and a new building was viewed as an optics disaster.
Enter Women’s Hockey.
It’s easy to want wrestling. As far as I know from the past, it’s not that simple if the goal is also to satisfy Title IX. Two preferred teams over Women’s Hockey couldn’t do it. Seems to me if Title IX is not a factor, then adding means club funding even if it’s called D1 Wrestling. I’m all for it. Even if Sandy has to add a different women’s sport for Title IX, we add wrestling anyway.
I could be, and often am, wrong.