Not sure why we don't at least give some of the young guys some playing time at WR whith out blowing their redshirts.
Its time for Pribula. Here's why...
- Thread starter Delcolion915
- Start date
A stat line MEANS NOTHING. Absolutely nothing
The QBR is because of the TD that Wallace turned into a pick--a 60 point swing with QBR--do you understand that?
None of it falls on Drew--he can't force his WRs to run better routes. When a WR can't beat a CB 1v1 the QB has no chance. Not one of our guys can. Not one.
We are a lock but I understand that you're too emotional to look at things logically. Next you'll be talking about who "deserves" it
When everyone talks about us being out at 10-2 (which we still likely win 11) they think everyone else magically wins out even when they play each other
What about when Ohio State was in zone, which they did a fair bit of?
He just doesn't seem to see things quick enough. Doesn't find the open receiver often enough.
He wasn't awful against OSU (though he was last year). He just wasn't very good either.
My head hurts--you don't find open receivers when no one is open
He was plenty good this year--it's not even debatable
Just because you and a few others want to bang Beau doesn't make your biased opinions accurately
Allar is elite--and if he had a supporting cast you'd see that.
Elite quarterbacks don't produce 0 touchdowns in their last 6 quarters of play.
Spare me with the supporting cast stuff. He literally has the best tight end in the country, and two of the better running backs in the country on his offense. And an offensive line that is pretty good.
He didn't. Rewatch Wisconsin and his perfect throw to Singleton for 6
Rewatch Wallace dropping a perfectly placed ball for 6
Rewatch Fleming dropping a perfect throw in the first half against Wisconsin
QBs aren't to blame for everything--only casuals say that. Like when the goalie is at fault for every goal allowed in hockey
It just means you don't know what you're seeing
I forgot Allar is the only QB in the country who has people drop his passes.
You are wrong. He quite literally DID go his last 6 quarters without leading his team to a TD. Watch the games again, or look at a box score. It really happened.
He's not--you forgot he had a TD against Wisconsin
He didn't play in the second half--keep trying dumbass
You are right. I did forget about the TD against Wisconsin. So 1 TD in his last 6 quarters. 2 of those quarters going against a defense that just allowed 40+ to Iowa.
He also "lit up" Illinois for 21 points and UCLA for 27 points.
Our offense has a lot of talent. It is not a great offense. The QB has something to do with that.
Yes and I had to tell you twice you forgot it because of your bias
And, again, we score more if his WRs catch the ball
Our offense has absolutely no talent at WR--none. And we see that weekly.
Harrison Wallace is pretty good. As is Liam Clifford. Do you think Indiana has way more offensive talent than PSU? Clearly not. But they have a great QB instead of a pretty good one. That's the difference.
Wallace is not good
Clifford is the only that can read a zone defense and sit down in it
Indiana has a better WR room than we do
Allar > Rourke
But you likely didn't even know Rourke's name
How many times have you watched Indiana play this year? Zero?
When did Rourke even play a decent defense this year?
For the record, no pocket passer should come to Penn State--it's not worth dealing with the fans that don't know anything about the game that think everyone is open in zone coverage or why, in zone, Drew's throw was behind a guy--hint, he was throwing to where they should have stopped.
I've watched Rourke play several times. I watched him carve up our defense when he was at Ohio. He is a better QB than Allar, and it isn't particularly close.
Rourke being better than Allar is one of the best things i've read on this board
He completed maybe half his passes against us and had almost no yards--promise you on that--but that was carving up our defense?
Wasn't he even benched in that game? Or were they just so bad he sat....he was definitely taken out
Not stats--his play--the game was too fast for him
But, sure, you can blame his supporting cast and the different talent levels but he didn't carve us up
In fact, he was subpar that day.
There's a reason Rourke wasn't highly sought after in the portal. He's a nice QB but not special
If Allar entered the portal tomorrow, how many offers do you think he'd have by the end of the first hour?
When I found out Rourke was at Indiana I thought it was a great pickup and put big money on Indiana to win and cover at UCLA early in the season. Thanks, Rourke!
QB 1: 73.3% completions, 2200 yards, 19 TD, 3 INT, 188.5 rating
QB 2: 70.1% completions, 1786 yards, 12 TD, 5 INT, 167.7 rating
Which one do you like?
QB 2: 70.1% completions, 1786 yards, 12 TD, 5 INT, 167.7 rating
Which one do you like?
Without fear of exaggeration, I have now read the same reference to UDub’s feared secondary from the same poster more times in the past 3 days than the number of national championships Pitt claims (I.e. > 937 give or take).
We ****ing get it! They’ve got Ronnie Lott, Dick Night Train Lane and Rod Woodson back there
We ****ing get it! They’ve got Ronnie Lott, Dick Night Train Lane and Rod Woodson back there
