ADVERTISEMENT

Jack66 w/ maybe the post of the year: Iowa & Minnesota take notes

amalone

Well-Known Member
Oct 12, 2005
8,888
9,012
1
Have to link the entire thread. Go down the bottom of the thread and reference his post.



**Comments on made regarding a switch in the mind set of the powers of collegiate wrestling
going to a more offensive mind set and the Iowa and Minnesota's, the old guard, being
left behind in the "arms" race. No firepower... NO National Championship. You can't win
in the NCAA Tourney clinging on to your opponent and winning 1 pt matches. Ask all the
returning champs who lost.... T-shirt, J'den Cox, Jesse Delgado. Either open up your
offensive arsenal or see the young guard take you down. Minnesota and Iowa have yet to
get the memo.


Great points... The evolution has been underway
 
Originally posted by amalone:
Have to link the entire thread. Go down the bottom of the thread and reference his post.



**Comments on made regarding a switch in the mind set of the powers of collegiate wrestling
going to a more offensive mind set and the Iowa and Minnesota's, the old guard, being
left behind in the "arms" race. No firepower... NO National Championship. You can't win
in the NCAA Tourney clinging on to your opponent and winning 1 pt matches. Ask all the
returning champs who lost.... T-shirt, J'den Cox, Jesse Delgado. Either open up your
offensive arsenal or see the young guard take you down. Minnesota and Iowa have yet to
get the memo.
One would be hard pressed to argue effectively against Jack as he has superior analytical abilities.
 
Interesting take. The thing is, Coach Brands has been railing on his wrestlers to shoot more for several years now (literally). I really don't pay much attention to J Robinson, but the need to shoot more seems to be a theme in every Brands interview. So the question becomes, are his statements viewed as just "coach speak", were his recent wrestlers not as coachable, or were his recent wrestlers simply not good enough to open up against top level competition? I tend to believe the latter. In this day and age you need athletic freaks in the lineup and Iowa and Minnesota both need more of them. (Note: I didn't entertain the fourth option of Brands simply not being great coach. I don't believe this to be the case even though recruiting IS a key aspect of the job).
 
Iowa had 12 bonus point wins to PSU's 6 at nationals. The Iowa just stands around and clings to 1 point wins narrative is old and inaccurate for the majority of our lineup. I believe the champion buckeyes only scored a couple more bonus point wins than the Hawks
 
Originally posted by 1stplacehawk:
Iowa had 12 bonus point wins to PSU's 6 at nationals. The Iowa just stands around and clings to 1 point wins narrative is old and inaccurate for the majority of our lineup. I believe the champion buckeyes only scored a couple more bonus point wins than the Hawks
You are obviously a loyal Hawkeye fan, I respect you for that, but I think you are guilty of a little rationalization.

Since you have come over to our board to discuss wrestling, I have a few questions for you. I'm not trying to be a smart-ass and hope it doesn't come across that way.

As I'm sure you know, Iowa had the #1 ranked recruiting class 5 years ago. Didn't it bother at all when 4 of the 5 seniors went out in the 1st round this year? Doesn't it concern you that Evans showed so much potential as a Freshman, but then became more and more conservative each year? Don't you wonder about the staff's ability to develop wresters when Dziewa, Balliweg, Kelly and Moore never became AAs even once? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think a 4th place finish by Telford last year is the best the class has to show.

You guys have some nice young talent on the team, but if I were a Hawk fan I would be wondering if they will continue to progress, or will they get 'Branded'.

Of course I speak from a BlueWhite perspective ... this is our board after all.. but I welcome honest answers to these questions from a few loyal Hawk fans like yourself.


















This post was edited on 3/23 9:13 PM by jack66

This post was edited on 3/23 9:16 PM by jack66
 
Originally posted by jack66:






Originally posted by 1stplacehawk:
Iowa had 12 bonus point wins to PSU's 6 at nationals. The Iowa just stands around and clings to 1 point wins narrative is old and inaccurate for the majority of our lineup. I believe the champion buckeyes only scored a couple more bonus point wins than the Hawks
You are obviously a loyal Hawkeye fan, I respect you for that, but I think you are guilty of a little rationalization.

Since you have come over to our board to discuss wrestling, I have a few questions for you. I'm not trying to be a smart-ass and hope it doesn't come across that way.

As I'm sure you know, Iowa had the #1 ranked recruiting class 5 years ago. Didn't it bother at all when 4 of the 5 seniors went out in the 1st round this year? Doesn't it concern you that Evans got more and more conservative each year and never improved on his 6th place finish in 2013? Don't you wonder about the staff's ability to develop wresters when Dziewa, Balliweg, Kelly and Moore never became AAs even once? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think a 4th place finish by Telford last year is the best the class has to show.

You guys have some nice young talent on the team, but if I were a Hawk fan I would be wondering if they will continue to progress, or will they get 'Branded'.

Of course I speak from a BlueWhite perspective ... this is our board after all.. but I welcome honest answers to these questions from a few loyal Hawk fans like yourself.





This post was edited on 3/23 9:07 PM by jack66
Of course I'm disappointed by that. The only one of those guys that I thought had the talent to be a national champ was Telford, who did improve whether his NCAA placement reflected it or not. It does seem as if the grind has been catching up to kids in their 5th season, but I do think that Brands self evaluates himself and the program a lot more than people give him credit for. I'm a loyal hawkeye fan, but I also am able to see past it. The perception that every hawkeye guy is a clinger and never shoots isn't accurate. That was the part of the post that I commented on.
 
Originally posted by jack66:








Originally posted by 1stplacehawk:
Iowa had 12 bonus point wins to PSU's 6 at nationals. The Iowa just stands around and clings to 1 point wins narrative is old and inaccurate for the majority of our lineup. I believe the champion buckeyes only scored a couple more bonus point wins than the Hawks
You are obviously a loyal Hawkeye fan, I respect you for that, but I think you are guilty of a little rationalization.

Since you have come over to our board to discuss wrestling, I have a few questions for you. I'm not trying to be a smart-ass and hope it doesn't come across that way.

As I'm sure you know, Iowa had the #1 ranked recruiting class 5 years ago. Didn't it bother at all when 4 of the 5 seniors went out in the 1st round this year? Doesn't it concern you that Evans showed so much potential as a Freshman, but then became more and more conservative each year? Don't you wonder about the staff's ability to develop wresters when Dziewa, Balliweg, Kelly and Moore never became AAs even once? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think a 4th place finish by Telford last year is the best the class has to show.

You guys have some nice young talent on the team, but if I were a Hawk fan I would be wondering if they will continue to progress, or will they get 'Branded'.

Of course I speak from a BlueWhite perspective ... this is our board after all.. but I welcome honest answers to these questions from a few loyal Hawk fans like yourself.
















This post was edited on 3/23 9:13 PM by jack66


This post was edited on 3/23 9:16 PM by jack66
An Iowa fan's perspective.

In taking a look at the departing senior class, I break them down into three categories

Mike Kelly - while I appreciate eveything he had to offer and the effort he gave, I am pretty sure everyone can agree he was not a highly sought after recruit.

Telford and Evans - Highly sought after, top notch recruits. A cursory glance suggests under-performing, or not wrestling to their best abilities, or maybe even "regressing." A closer look suggests they may have been wrestling in the two deepest weight classes in the NCAA in their career. Evans had three years of Kokesh (3x AA), Storely (4x AA), Brown (champ, 3x AA) Heflin (runnerup, 3x AA), Perry (2x champ). One of the things that is often brought up about Evans is lack of offense, and how he was not able to ride as well as his career went on. Is this regression or familiarity with opponents? I am sure people will have differing opinions. My larger question is why did a guy who made the semis two years in a row lose out the rest of the tournament? As for Telford, the sheer amount of times he has had to wrestle the likes of Nelson, McMullan, Coon, Medberry, Zach Rey, Coon, Chalfant, etc. These guys are all very talented, and the gap between top notch talent is even smaller at HWT, as there is less room for error. All this, and Telford was still most likely an injury away from being a 4x AA. While he didnt reach the pinnacle, I highly doubt anyone would claim his career unsucessful or a let down.

Dziewa and Moore - Color me perplexed. Outside of an injury to Moore this year, and pulling too much weight his 1st year, I dont really know how to explain these two. To me, it almost seemed as if they only had confidence in their bread and butter moves, and would not make adjustments.

As for some others that were mentioned or hinted at, I find it difficult to place blame on some others that may have had issues, such as Jake Ballweg deciding not to wrestle anymore, Marlin not fitting in at Iowa, Skon being homesick, etc. There are some things that are just unavoidable, and you will have that with 18-22 year old kids.

As for the young talent, I like what I am seeing already for improvement in Gilman, Clark, Sorensen, Grothus, Meyer, and Brooks. Gilman has opened up and been more offensive this year. Clark appears to have worked through any perceived mental blocks. Sorensen has proved his toughness from his redshirt year, and I have no doubt the offense will be increasing as he matures. Grothus has shown his ability (prior to injury) for competing with and beating some very good wrestlers. Meyer beat multiple qualifiers and AAs this year, and Brooks has made considerable strides (side note - incredibly tough draw for him this year).

Long winded, but I feel comfortable with the strides the youngest guys are taking, and while the senior class may not have lived up to expectations, I feel maybe some opinions of some of them are kind of skewed.
 
Originally posted by 1stplacehawk:
Iowa had 12 bonus point wins to PSU's 6 at nationals. The Iowa just stands around and clings to 1 point wins narrative is old and inaccurate for the majority of our lineup. I believe the champion buckeyes only scored a couple more bonus point wins than the Hawks
This is just an awful way to measure your team's style. You had a three seed and a five seed lose in the first round. They ended up getting two bonus point wins apiece in the wrestlebacks. One-third of your team's bonus point wins came in matches your guys shouldn't have even been wrestling against either (a) unseeded wrestlers or (b) the husk of a human being that remained after Nick Dardanes quit the sport and left the arena.

That said, I think the charge against Iowa is a little overblown. One reason could be that this current crop pales in comarison to the relentless, attacking wrestlers who marked the Gable era. They are not, by and large, overly defensive; they are just less aggressive than they were when they were the team to beat year after year. The other major reason can be summed up in two words: Mike Evans. Iowa's team captain and most recognizable figure never set up a shot he couldn't refuse to take. At NCAAs, five total points or fewer were scored in five of his matches. The only wrestler I can find in the tournament who came close to matching that level of offensive futility was Jason Tsirtsis, who also had five. I went through the brackets quickly and couldn't even find another wrestler who had four matches with five or fewer total points. By comparison, the enitre Ohio State team had two matches where five or fewer total points were scored.
 
Originally posted by CholleyVandine:

....By comparison, the enitre Ohio State team had two matches where five or fewer total points were scored.
Assuming that stat is true, both of those matches were wrestled by Snyder, who won both his Quarter-final (Shiller) and Semi-final (Cox) matches via undeserving 3-2 stall-fests / snooze-fests. Was so happy to see Gadson show him the lights when he pulled the same weak bullshat on him in the finals - couldn't have happened to a more deserving "undeserving finalist" IMO.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT