It's not turning the other cheek. It's focusing on the goals.
The Paternos gain nothing by responding to every story - the other side simply has more to throw at the Paternos righ tnow than the Paternos can throw back.
Jay Throws Down the Gauntlet
- Thread starter simons96
- Start date
It's not turning the other cheek. It's focusing on the goals.
The Paternos gain nothing by responding to every story - the other side simply has more to throw at the Paternos righ tnow than the Paternos can throw back.
Speaking of turning cheeks, A+ on the sig pic. Can you walk around to the front and take a shot from that angle? I would like complete information to form a valid opinion as to the overall rating of your future ex-wife.
Reads like the game plan for the 83 Kick Off Classic. It's produced the same results as well.
Then the public as you see it is very stupid
Collectively, if not stupid, then today's public is most certainly intellectually lazy. Just lapping up their lives 140 characters at a time.
Our peers... The Sheeple! Almost as lazy as the MSM that feeds them...
So, let the media run away with it again and further cement the narrative? Hasn't worked and won't.
I agree, and I hope they start by suing CNN/Ganim.
we all know how much she enjoys testifying under oath about her bogus sources.
JoeBatters1 - You are correct - On the first day of Jerry Sandusky's trial, Victim 4 testified that Tom Bradley saw him in the shower with Sandusky once and wouldn't leave. "I think he was suspicious," Victim 4 said in court, during testimony that lasted all afternoon on the first day of Sandusky's trial. He said Bradley stayed in the shower and talked to the two until they both left.
http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2012/06/jerry_sandusky_trial_alleged_v.html
It's a person or people who see PSU coming out of this, and having a bright future with CJF and staff who are trying to bring us down again! It's an agenda! I ****ing hate all journalist scumbag liars!!
Q DCUOTE="wrm125, post: 1775844, member: 5306"]People here have made cryptic comments about Schiano being unhirable at PSU because of something that happened in the past. This stuff related?[/QUOTE]
Schiano went to Miami, became their DC I believe, then went to Rutgers as their head coach reviving their program that was dead for a century, became Tampa Bay's head coach and now is Ohio State's DC. I'd say that's anything but unhirable.
Schiano went to Miami, became their DC I believe, then went to Rutgers as their head coach reviving their program that was dead for a century, became Tampa Bay's head coach and now is Ohio State's DC. I'd say that's anything but unhirable.
Yes. Now is the time to light things up. It can't really get worse. Set shit on fire and throw gasoline on when they make the move. They have to come out swinging hard, maybe even harder this time than initially. The time time for a patient approach is now lost if there ever was one to begin with.
don't forget Fells Acres Day Care (ironically, Dorothy Rabinowitz of the WSJ won a Pulitzer Prize for her coverage of this case)
"Other than such testimony, the prosecutors had no shred of physical or other proof that could remotely pass as evidence of abuse".[
All of this over an unsubstantiated claim. It's easy to sling mud, but a lot harder once you introduce the burden of proof. I'm curious to see how well these latest accusations hold water against legal scrutiny. Until then, why not throw a similar haymaker back at them? We have powerful people on our side too.
An unsubstantiated claim that has already been paid out. A little late for "legal scrutiny"...
Yeah, why didn't they fired Joe in the 70s, 80s or 90s if they had all of these suspicions? It's a total joke.
If you're going to sling back, don't stop short...be specific with claims like "Joe personally told Surma/Frasier/Peetz/etc., and followed up multiple times." Let THEM prove a false narrative.
I think we're learning the hard way that appeasing the CSA mafia is the wrong way to go.
showing sensitivity to alleged victims (even "victims" who have had their day in court and "prevailed") is one thing
refusing to question obviously sketchy claims, and assuming anyone who claims to be a victim must be telling the truth, is a slippery slope
when you have organizations and groups of people actively applauding the potential 9 year incarceration of someone who did not commit a violent or property crime, but merely (in their words) caused "further pain and suffering to victims" . . . it is time to realize these so-called victims advocates are a huge liability to the truth, the Paternos, and to the University.
showing sensitivity to alleged victims (even "victims" who have had their day in court and "prevailed") is one thing
refusing to question obviously sketchy claims, and assuming anyone who claims to be a victim must be telling the truth, is a slippery slope
when you have organizations and groups of people actively applauding the potential 9 year incarceration of someone who did not commit a violent or property crime, but merely (in their words) caused "further pain and suffering to victims" . . . it is time to realize these so-called victims advocates are a huge liability to the truth, the Paternos, and to the University.
Problem is the difference in age. Writing off all victims is pure stupidity at this point in time.
Schiano went to Miami, became their DC I believe, then went to Rutgers as their head coach reviving their program that was dead for a century, became Tampa Bay's head coach and now is Ohio State's DC. I'd say that's anything but unhirable.[/QUOTE]
you should actually read what people post. the poster never said he couldn't get a coaching job, just not one at PSU.
