Don't know if this was already posted, but here's the video anyway...
? I don't get it.I do agree, no way the one kid was clean at the start.
? I don't get it.
? I don't get it.
Ya he is better built then I thought. I can see him playing at 215-220 lbs in college.
The live-call announcer at the meet and on the video says that he thought the 4-hole, Elliott jumped via flinch; however, the flinch was extremely slight and because his feet did not leave the blocks early, nor did his hands/fingers leave the surface early, I think it was properly ignored. The other thing I didn't get was that the electronic timer originally showed the time at 10.41, but they reported it at 10.44 and then adjusted it on review to 10.43.
You interpretation of what constitutes a false start would be correct if the IAAF definition were rigorously followed at the HS level, but it isn't (nor is it by the NCAA). As it is, if the starter saw movement by runners in the blocks he should have called them up. But since many starters employed by high school federations are doddering ninnies, who knows......
FAT devices are not foolproof. Quality varies and a lot of the stuff used at the high school level is simply junk. What does work flawlessly in almost all cases is the photo finish clock that is triggered by the starters gun. So if a meet is using less than the best, they simply go to the video tape. Sounds like that's what was done at the PIAA championship.
The OP's embedded video showed the time as 10.41 in its running clock graphic. I thought most Fully-Automated Timing Systems (FAT) were tied to the Starting Gun for triggering and lasers at the finish line (I think many high schools use Lynx Video & FAT Systems, but this was held at Shippensburg State U, so who knows). What do you think the winning time shown in video, 10.41, was tied to, the Starting Gun? I'm assuming the FAT System recorded the original 10.44 announced as winning time.
Anyone here ever party at College Park Apts. in the background??? Good times...