ADVERTISEMENT

Kane fires back

Obliviax

Well-Known Member
Gold Member
Aug 21, 2001
126,416
87,950
1
More "saucy" emails are on their way!

CPc72IQWcAEtPDx.jpg
 
Or maybe if nobody sent porno emails in the first place Kane wouldn't have anything to work with.
Oh for crying out loud, the senders of the emails are no doubt deserving of scorn, but this idea that Kane has clean hands here is silly and naive. She skyrocketed to office out of relative obscurity in Scranton/ Wilkes Barre by leveraging her husband's wealth and connections to the Clintons. She is a politician of the highest order and is no stranger to hardball politics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meteor-Lion
Oh for crying out loud, the senders of the emails are no doubt deserving of scorn, but this idea that Kane has clean hands here is silly and naive. She skyrocketed to office out of relative obscurity in Scranton/ Wilkes Barre by leveraging her husband's wealth and connections to the Clintons. She is a politician of the highest order and is no stranger to hardball politics.
I for one have certainly never said Kane's hands are clean but saying she's being petty implies the mud slinging is a one way street. She's had a target on her back since she took office.
 
Its probably not the porn in those e-mails that will get them in trouble. If they're dumb enough to send THAT stuff around, what ELSE did they get sloppy with?

Kane should just call Bagwell up and grant him RTK requests he hasn't even asked for yet.
Or Kane should tell Bagwell what to request. Gets her off of the hook (tic)
 
I for one have certainly never said Kane's hands are clean but saying she's being petty implies the mud slinging is a one way street. She's had a target on her back since she took office.

Totally agree... If this is the game they want to play... Roll the dice... Expose all the cowards... Hypocrites... Liars...frauds... Only those who have something to fear... Should be afraid ! Not even a Pa resident but the state could go down as one of the morally corrupt in the entire Union... Fina I hope they expose more crap then we could even imagined.

Blow the lid off of this debacle.... I can't imagine the additional lawsuits coming this way... WOW !
 
Its probably not the porn in those e-mails that will get them in trouble. If they're dumb enough to send THAT stuff around, what ELSE did they get sloppy with?

Kane should just call Bagwell up and grant him RTK requests he hasn't even asked for yet.
Now is the best time for Bagwell to inundate the OAG with FOI / RTK requests involving anyone related to the States case against JS. Time to go fishing...
 
In a corrupt state where government agencies do everything but their f'ing job.....ask our missing Centre County DA, if you can find him if he agrees?......all the crap needs to hit the fan....and the house cleaned. Funny that you can tell who is a Retardlican ...who is a Dummicrat as well as who is an Independent for the most part by their posts. Then there are anarchists like me....just leave em all in office....till the entire system crumbles.... on it's obese face.
 
Now is the best time for Bagwell to inundate the OAG with FOI / RTK requests involving anyone related to the States case against JS. Time to go fishing...


Exactly. Make sure you've requested everything regarding communication between Fina (or other AG employees) and Freeh, Feudale, Seth Williams, Erickson, BoT members, the big ten or the NCAA. There's nothing to lose now. ;)
 
Makes her look petty... I get in more trouble so I'm going to rat others out.....

But, of course, people have resisted her explanation that she would be charged with retaliation (and/or looking petty) if she had just released them up to this point.

LOL. SMH.
 
  • Like
Reactions: step.eng69
Makes her look petty... I get in more trouble so I'm going to rat others out.....
That ship sailed long ago.

Why do you think she's charged? She was too petty to let Fina embarrass her and move on. I'm not saying she's completely to blame, GJ leaks are common and she's been held to a different standard. I'm saying her being petty allowed it to happen.

Besides, this ruling allows her to maintain her defense at trial. Had she just released them (emails) without the protective order being withdrawn, which she could have without fear since December, it undermined her case.

Now she can point to her suspension as proof people are after her. Fighting the release is pointless now.

I doubt there's anything worse than what we've seen. That's not an excuse or an attempt to minimize it. It's a judgment on how bad the previously released emails are.
 
Its now clear that the charges, the suspension against Kane were NOT to suppress the email release.

The release of the emails though, will go way beyond porn. Many many convictions will be overturned if there's any evidence of collusion between OAG and judges. Sandusky might be back in the President's box come bowl time.
 
Oh for crying out loud, the senders of the emails are no doubt deserving of scorn, but this idea that Kane has clean hands here is silly and naive. She skyrocketed to office out of relative obscurity in Scranton/ Wilkes Barre by leveraging her husband's wealth and connections to the Clintons. She is a politician of the highest order and is no stranger to hardball politics.

So what? Since when has clean hands been a requirement for elected office in PA? Or is that just a requirement for newcomers? Get back to me with your complaints when she has ruined someone's life who did not deserve it.

Get the emails out there, all of them, ASAP. We will have to wait on your "good government" desires for a different day.
 
Its now clear that the charges, the suspension against Kane were NOT to suppress the email release.

The release of the emails though, will go way beyond porn. Many many convictions will be overturned if there's any evidence of collusion between OAG and judges. Sandusky might be back in the President's box come bowl time.

Who's gonna overturn those convictions? The same corrupt Supreme Court which is hammering Kane at every turn to discredit her? HAA!
 
Who's gonna overturn those convictions? The same corrupt Supreme Court which is hammering Kane at every turn to discredit her? HAA!
The Bi-party Supreme Court which voted unanimously against her?

Kane doesn't need anyone's help in being discredited. She does that better than anyone else could.

Wolf wisely thinks she should resign. The Republicans should want her to remain in office. She is the gift that keeps on giving. If you are independent of either party, you should want her to step down. The way she has run the AG's office is an embarrassment to the Commonwealth. I feel badly for the people who work there.
 
The Bi-party Supreme Court which voted unanimously against her?

Kane doesn't need anyone's help in being discredited. She does that better than anyone else could.

Wolf wisely thinks she should resign. The Republicans should want her to remain in office. She is the gift that keeps on giving. If you are independent of either party, you should want her to step down. The way she has run the AG's office is an embarrassment to the Commonwealth. I feel badly for the people who work there.

Corruption, it should be clear by now, is an equal opportunity game in PA--both parties are corrupt, and the higher you go in state government the worse it is.
 
Corruption, it should be clear by now, is an equal opportunity game in PA--both parties are corrupt, and the higher you go in state government the worse it is.
I agree. It is very sad.

The point I was making is that this isn't some Republican witchhunt. The court ruled unanimously against her.

Her flaunting of laws and court orders, along with her selective enforcement, are an embarrassment to us all. Just because there may be issues with members of the Supreme Court does not make them wrong in this case.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obliviax
The Supreme Court is unanimous against her because she nailed one of their own. And I wonder if any of them are concerned that they might be in some email, somewhere, that has yet to come to light.

This isn't politics for them so much as self-preservation.
 
Last edited:
I agree. It is very sad.

The point I was making is that this isn't some Republican witchhunt. The court ruled unanimously against her.

Her flaunting of laws and court orders, along with her selective enforcement, are an embarrassment to us all. Just because there may be issues with members of the Supreme Court does not make them wrong in this case.
I don't recall anyone saying it was a Republican witch hunt. It is a witch hunt by the corrupt, against the truth.

One of the big problems is that very few Pennsylvanians have shown the capacity to be embarrassed by their corrupt government for the many, many years it has operated like a carnival skillo wheel. And, you can pick and choose which corrupt team you wish to win the tussle, but you should be aware that if Kane is beaten down, you will get NO MORE truth about the scum who scapegoated our University.

Suppose they beat Kane down and run her out of office, then the Paternos or one of the myriad other civil suits ends up in a discovery dispute that goes to the Supreme court regarding these emails. Do you really believe that if Kane is gone, and the threat that she will spill the water is removed forever, the SCt will nevertheless permit the ugly truth to be seen?

This is how you get to the place where everyone is scum and nobody can be trusted--by shutting down the truth by discrediting those who would reveal it. When you root for that, you root against PSU.
 
Pennsylvanian politics and state's court system are irretrievably corrupt and Pennsylvania voters, either with their ballots or their failure to even show up and vote, give their endorsement to the embarrassment.
Pennsylvania voters have the power to reform it. Sadly, they will not use it.
 
Last edited:
Its now clear that the charges, the suspension against Kane were NOT to suppress the email release.

The release of the emails though, will go way beyond porn. Many many convictions will be overturned if there's any evidence of collusion between OAG and judges. Sandusky might be back in the President's box come bowl time.
^^This. I've already seen some defense attorneys talk about this. They are salivating for retrials. The entire state judiciary is fuqqed right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rickdz and simons96
^^This. I've already seen some defense attorneys talk about this. They are salivating for retrials. The entire state judiciary is fuqqed right now.
If Kane is discredited and hounded out, the retrials will not occur. Mark it down.
 
The Supreme Court is unanimous against her because she nailed one of their own. And I wonder if any of them are concerned that they might be in some email, somewhere, that has yet to come to light.

This isn't politics for them so much as self-preservation.

Given that there was something in those first emails, and
Given that there was even more in the second set, and
Given that the trolls/badguys were all insisting she was lying about what was in those first two (and then conspired to misrepresent what was in them after they were released)....
It seems like the smart bet to say:
It is ALMOST a given that there is plenty more in what she has not felt free to show up to this point.

SMH at anybody who tries to divert from that simple probablility.
 
Its probably not the porn in those e-mails that will get them in trouble. If they're dumb enough to send THAT stuff around, what ELSE did they get sloppy with?

Kane should just call Bagwell up and grant him RTK requests he hasn't even asked for yet.


Kane is a joke. The one judge she tried to get off of her case did not even send porn. He received a saucy joke in his private yahoo account. Why does Kane even have access to private accounts?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meteor-Lion
I'm so tired of all this. I wish Kane could just go on Oprah and tell all and have women nationwide on Kane's side.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT