To throw out a hypothetical -- yes, this is a lot of moving parts:Ha, I was only half-serious (in a prior thread earlier in the week) about us needing to be Duke Blueberry fans today, but perhaps we see something like this on Tuesday:
#1 - Snyder
#2 - Medberry
#3 - Nevills
#4 - Kasper
#5 - Walz
#6 - Schaffer
Or does Kasper leap-frog to #3, with Walz #4, thereby pushing Nevills down to #5. That would be a backfire...
To throw out a hypothetical -- yes, this is a lot of moving parts:
- Kasper wins out the rest of the regular season, including over Walz in the ACC final.
- Nevills wins out until the B10 finals to Snyder. Snyder skips the dual; Nick beats Black and Schafer in duals, then Medbery in the B10 semis.
Then I could see the seeds being 1 Snyder, 2-3 Kasper and Nevills (in either order), 4-5 Medbery and Walz, 6-7 Schafer and Sasquatch.
That's pretty much the dream scenario for Nick this year ... well, short of Snyder skipping B10s and nationals.
No. He would've lost 2x to Medbery, and the seeding committee will almost certainly rank the ACC champ over the B10 3rd if they otherwise have similar records (Walz would then have 2 losses -- OT to Medbery, and today's loss to Kasper which he would've avenged).Yeah, the hypotheticals make my head spin. How about this:
Walz avenges his loss to Kasper @ ACC Championships (both guys win out up to that match). Nevills wins out to B1G semis, as does Medbery. Nevills has to win that match to get #2 seed at Nationals. But, if he loses to Medbery, and again it is very close, is that enough to get him the #3 seed? Without any matches between the B1G top-3 and the ACC top-2, how does it shake out if Nevills only losses are to Medbery, and they are razor-thin losses?
Did you happen to notice the arms which are as big of some people's waistAs I was leaving Grace Hall on Friday, Walz went by me. I was shocked at how short he was - maybe 5'9"? He's probably 6" shorter than Kasper, which may have created some issues.
No. He would've lost 2x to Medbery, and the seeding committee will almost certainly rank the ACC champ over the B10 3rd if they otherwise have similar records (Walz would then have 2 losses -- OT to Medbery, and today's loss to Kasper which he would've avenged).
Did you happen to notice the arms which are as big of some people's waist
Yeah, the hypotheticals make my head spin. How about this:
Walz avenges his loss to Kasper @ ACC Championships (both guys win out up to that match). Nevills wins out to B1G semis, as does Medbery. Nevills has to win that match to get #2 seed at Nationals. But, if he loses to Medbery, and again it is very close, is that enough to get him the #3 seed? Without any matches between the B1G top-3 and the ACC top-2, how does it shake out if Nevills only losses are to Medbery, and they are razor-thin losses?
Ha, I was only half-serious (in a prior thread earlier in the week) about us needing to be Duke Blueberry fans today, but perhaps we see something like this on Tuesday:
#1 - Snyder
#2 - Medberry
#3 - Nevills
#4 - Kasper
#5 - Walz
#6 - Schaffer
Or does Kasper leap-frog to #3, with Walz #4, thereby pushing Nevills down to #5. That would be a backfire...
Walz has beaten Coon, right? If so I doubt Kasper's length was the issue.He's also about twice as wide as me. This is true. But Kasper is a long guy. May have been a bad physical matchup for Walz.
IIRC Walz has beaten Dawson Peck, who's about 6-9 tall.Walz has beaten Coon, right? If so I doubt Kasper's length was the issue.
Walz has beaten Coon, right? If so I doubt Kasper's length was the issue.
Evidently, a guy who has just improved tremendously.Wow Kasper continues to impress
Wondering if I would be a bad physical match up for walz , doubt he has any experience with someone as fat and slow as me. Definitely would throw his timing offWalz has beaten Coon, right? If so I doubt Kasper's length was the issue.
he looked good at the scuffle - wrestling like a lightweight and willing to mix it up.Wondering if I would be a bad physical match up for walz , doubt he has any experience with someone as fat and slow as me. Definitely would throw his timing off
WIN Magazine appears to be the 1st to issue their rankings, and at 285 they went as follows (last week in parenthesis):
1. Snyder (1)
2. Medberry (2)
3. Kasper (5)
4. Walz (3)
5. Nevills (4)
If InterMat does the same tomorrow, I'm going to feel like a jerk.
If InterMat does the same tomorrow, I'm going to feel like a jerk.
it remains to be seen what InterMat does. FloWrestling has posted their rankings for 285 and they mirror WIN's, and last week's Flo rankings at 285 were the same as were last week's WIN rankings as well.