ADVERTISEMENT

Kenny Frazier....Merck.....and the PSU Settlements

bjf1984

Well-Known Member
Sep 8, 2014
4,494
2,818
1
Bear with me a moment, and don't be afraid to do a LITTLE math:

Most of us - I think - are aware that Kenny Frazier made his bones as the point man in Merck's VIOXX settlement. It wouldn't be disingenuous to say that the VIOXX settlement led to Kenny being named as Merck's CEO.

For those who are not aware of all the details:

...
VIOXX killed thousands of people. The LOWEST estimate on deaths caused by VIOXX was 27,000 (the FDA estimate) (http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/vioxx_estimates.html.) Other estimates were as high as 100,000+.

Merck KNEW that their drug was dangerous, but the drug was such a profit maker they hid the testing results. (http://www.naturalnews.com/027582_Merck_Vioxx.html)

The VIOXX settlement that elevated Kenny to the CEO spot at Merck was for $4.85 Billion (http://www.cbsnews.com/…/merck-to-fund-485b-vioxx-settleme…/).

Let's do the math:
$4.85 Billion / 27,000 = $180,000 per DEATH
_________________________________________

As we all know, Kenny was the point man in PSU's "rush to accept responsibility" for the Sandusky victims. Individuals claiming to be victims of Sandusky - even though PSU had, at the absolute most, VERY tangential liability, and even to "victims" who had not been vetted in any significant way - were handed payouts of approximately $3,000,000 each.
SEVENTEEN times as much as the payouts for DEATHS caused by VIOXX (which was a drug that Merck KNEW killed people, but they put it out there anyway in order to rake in big profits)

Tell me....does that add up?

Why would this very same "man" (I use that term very loosely....and only in the - I think - biological sense) rush to hand out $3,000,000 to potential victims of child abuse who had AT BEST a very tangential claim of liability wrt Penn State.....after making his bones by heading up a settlement that resulted in payouts of under $180,000 per victim for KILLING folks in a clear case of liability, by a firm that disregarded their safety in a quest for profits?

Kenny would probably wave his hands....and tell us that we (unsophisticated rubes) "Don't know how the system works". Uh....Kenny.....WE DO KNOW HOW YOUR SYSTEM WORKS.

What was it that drove Kenny and the Scoundrels to such an incredible decision? What is it that they are so desperate to hide?

BTW.....at the time of the "Sandusky Victim Payouts", Merck was in final negotiations with the Commonwealth of PA - and Governor Tom Corbett - on the approval of the VIOXX settlements with the state (Each state had to approve the VIOXX settlement in order for it to become official. If Merck - Kenny - did not get approval from the state - Tom Corbett, each case could move forward through the legal system, with the potential for much higher settlement costs for Merck)
 
Last edited:
When your moral compass only points one way, toward greed, this is what you get. It might take some time, but I've got faith is cosmic karma that Kenny boy will get his.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TMS1950
Bear with me a moment, and don't be afraid to do a LITTLE math:

Most of us - I think - are aware that Kenny Frazier made his bones as the point man in Merck's VIOXX settlement. It wouldn't be disingenuous to say that the VIOXX settlement led to Kenny being named as Merck's CEO.

For those who are not aware of all the details:

...
VIOXX killed thousands of people. The LOWEST estimate on deaths caused by VIOXX was 27,000 (the FDA estimate) (http://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/vioxx_estimates.html.) Other estimates were as high as 100,000+.

Merck KNEW that their drug was dangerous, but the drug was such a profit maker they hid the testing results. (http://www.naturalnews.com/027582_Merck_Vioxx.html)

The VIOXX settlement that elevated Kenny to the CEO spot at Merck was for $4.85 Billion (http://www.cbsnews.com/…/merck-to-fund-485b-vioxx-settleme…/).

Let's do the math:
$4.85 Billion / 27,000 = $180,000 per DEATH
_________________________________________

As we all know, Kenny was the point man in PSU's "rush to accept responsibility" for the Sandusky victims. Individuals claiming to be victims of Sandusky - even though PSU had, at the absolute most, VERY tangential liability, and even to "victims" who had not been vetted in any significant way - were handed payouts of approximately $3,000,000 each.
SEVENTEEN times as much as the payouts for DEATHS caused by VIOXX (which was a drug that Merck KNEW killed people, but they put it out there anyway in order to rake in big profits)

Tell me....does that add up?

Why would this very same "man" (I use that term very loosely....and only in the - I think - biological sense) rush to hand out $3,000,000 to potential victims of child abuse who had AT BEST a very tangential claim of liability wrt Penn State.....after making his bones by heading up a settlement that resulted in payouts of under $180,000 per victim for KILLING folks in a clear case of liability, by a firm that disregarded their safety in a quest for profits?

Kenny would probably wave his hands....and tell us that we (unsophisticated rubes) "Don't know how the system works". Uh....Kenny.....WE DO KNOW HOW YOUR SYSTEM WORKS.

What was it that drove Kenny and the Scoundrels to such an incredible decision? What is it that they are so desperate to hide?

BTW.....at the time of the "Sandusky Victim Payouts", Merck was in final negotiations with the Commonwealth of PA - and Governor Tom Corbett - on the approval of the VIOXX settlements (Each state had to approve the VIOXX settlement in order for it to become official. If Merck - Kenny - did not get approval from the state - Tom Corbett, each victim's case could move forward through the legal system, with the potential for much higher settlement costs for Merck)


I will tell you for a fact that the model for dealing with Sandusky was tested with both Vioxx and BP but with a throw in the towel twist that makes no sense as you note. Kenny drove this bus when it came to the corporate/legal/insurer playbook. Now, many in the corporate world would actually quietly applaud his handling of Sandusky -- proactive defense, ascertain financial hit, move quickly on public opinion etc. I can actually understand that type of thinking because frankly, I have to understand that mindset due to my employment. It's a conservative, corporate, modern times type of response. The problem is that Penn State isn't Merck or BP or any other shareholder beholden entity. This is a university, not a playground for arrogant lawyers to try out corporate liability strategies. It is the height of arrogance to assume you can throw your alma mater under the bus with the desire to obfuscate, pay and move on. Then, when questioned, offer racist remarks and essentially dismiss the very people that built and now support the university.

But unlike the multidistrict litigation fights (Vioxx was hand-to hand combat in courts across the country all coordinated for Kenny by one firm) Kenny made his name on there is a twist with Sandusky. Why did Kenny and cabal work the media to the tune of $12 million (hamfisted imho), pay for a phony corporate "cover yourself and find the boogeyman" investigation, agree to every possible sanction, pay out large sums quickly to whomever agreed to not implicate the Second Mile and then try to tell an alumni base of 750,000 to 'move on' without a clear understanding of the details? All while three senior people are under indictment yet no one has been found guilty of anything except for, and rightfully so, the criminal who created this mess.

You are correct. Why the quick payout by Kenny, a man who carved out a career by fighting like mad and refusing to pay large sums quickly? Great post.
 
Last edited:
Great post Barry...those numbers really put things into perspective as to how much Kenny failed PSU at its greatest time of need.

Talk about a conflict of interest with Kenny trying to get a good settlement from state of PA vioxx while at same time managing the JS crisis for PSU (by throwing PSU football under the bus he did the state of PA DPW/CYS and TSM a HUGE favor)!!

Kenny, Corbett, and freeh....some of the most corrupt greedy scumbags in the world.
 
Why would this very same "man" (I use that term very loosely....and only in the - I think - biological sense) rush to hand out $3,000,000 to potential victims of child abuse who had AT BEST a very tangential claim of liability wrt Penn State.....after making his bones by heading up a settlement that resulted in payouts of under $180,000 per victim for KILLING folks in a clear case of liability, by a firm that disregarded their safety in a quest for profits? Ken made that $3,000,000/victim decision? And here I thought it was Ken Feinberg who made the PSU victim recommendations. Silly me. BTW, didn't the entire Board unanimously agree to it including your dissident group?

Kenny would probably wave his hands....and tell us that we (unsophisticated rubes) "Don't know how the system works". And truer words would never be spoken.

What was it that drove Kenny and the Scoundrels to such an incredible decision? Years of executive management experience which is something you clearly lack.
 

th


So....big man....when should I be expecting you? You pussy.

Your are truly a contemptible sub-human piece of filth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: simons96
Made you look like a jackass did I? LOL! That's not hard to do. BTW, I think simple simon96 is talking about you. At least he doesn't do it behind your back.........as far as you know. LOL!

Crawl back in your hole.......vermin.

th



Your Masters will ring when they need your Piss-Boy services again.
loading_lg_w.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: simons96
Barry, good stuff.

Do you or anyone else have details on the settlements by state? I was only able to find the PA data and it appears the other states that have settled were for "undisclosed amounts".

Merck had quite a few requirements in order to be eligible to receive payouts for claimants. Does anyone know what requirements the Sandusky "victims" had to present in order to get a slice of the pie? Here are the Merck requirements:

"The settlement required that claimants provide medical and pharmacy records confirming the occurrence of a heart attack, ischemic stroke, or sudden cardiac death; the receipt of at least 30 Vioxx pills within 60 days prior to the injury or death; and confirmation of Vioxx being used within 14 days of the Vioxx-related event.[62] The settlement was generally viewed by industry analysts and investors as a victory for Merck, considering that original estimates of Merck's liability reached between $10 billion and $25 billion."
 
  • Like
Reactions: simons96
Barry, good stuff.

Do you or anyone else have details on the settlements by state? I was only able to find the PA data and it appears the other states that have settled were for "undisclosed amounts".

Merck had quite a few requirements in order to be eligible to receive payouts for claimants. Does anyone know what requirements the Sandusky "victims" had to present in order to get a slice of the pie? Here are the Merck requirements:

"The settlement required that claimants provide medical and pharmacy records confirming the occurrence of a heart attack, ischemic stroke, or sudden cardiac death; the receipt of at least 30 Vioxx pills within 60 days prior to the injury or death; and confirmation of Vioxx being used within 14 days of the Vioxx-related event.[62] The settlement was generally viewed by industry analysts and investors as a victory for Merck, considering that original estimates of Merck's liability reached between $10 billion and $25 billion."
I don't have that stuff handy.....off the top of my head:

I think it was about 40 states who signed on to a more-or-less generic agreement.....and about 10 states that took on the process individually (PA was one of those).
I have seen the PA settlement stuff (basically, the stuff you quoted)....I am not sure if I have seen any details from the other states that did an "individual" deal.

It was such a huge deal....I am sure there are some Attorneys who work in that area, who must have put together an analysis......I assume some folks on the board who are in that field (one of the non-douchebags, hopefully) could provide some links to information.

[EDIT: Ryan Bagwell put this together....some good links here: http://www.bagwellforpennstate.com/...ett-support-during-probe-of-sandusky-scandal/

Thanks to Bob Daman for forwarding the link to me]
 
  • Like
Reactions: JmmyW and simons96
here's a good summation from drugwatch (dated 5/15/14)

LINK

in a recently sleazy move, Merck requested that the Alaska AG lawsuit be thrown out because . . . the drug's been off the market for more than 10 years.

LINK

in what is likely a sickening twist of irony, I have a feeling this is the tactic of the NCAA/PSU BoT . . . delay delay delay then claim some bullsh*t SOL argument.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT