http://co.centre.pa.us/centreco/media/upload/Sandusky Amended Petition for Post Conviction Relief.pdf (pages 20-21) for PROOF that the author of the Sandusky Grand Jury presentment lied about McQueary actually seeing a sexual assault on a minor. I will re-file the professional misconduct complaint I filed in February 2012 (on the basis of McQueary's testimony in the Curley/Schultz hearing) this week, as soon as I can get more information.
We don't know enough about what happened when police approached Mike, so we need to pause on those selfie claims. As for Dranov's testimony, it is interesting b/c it seems that Mike didn't know that it was JS or didn't even see JS until JS walked out of the shower.
Victim 2 is on the potential witness list if there is a Sandusky retrial. The situation with him and Shubin is beyond fascinating.
As you all know, Vic 2 was Sandusky's biggest supporter before Shubin gets ahold of him sometime before December 13, 2011. Shubin then refuses to allow McGettigan or anyone from the AG's office to talk to AM before the 12/13/2011 Sandusky preliminary hearing (I'm assuming because he hasn't yet gotten AM to flip).
Shubin is then denied access to the 12/16/2011 Curley Schultz preliminary hearing (I assume in retaliation by the State for not allowing access to AM).
On 2/10/2012, after another Sandusky hearing, Shubin gets into a heated argument with Sassano about McGettigan, and Fina. He demands that AM NOW be interviewed as a "Victim". But ONLY if he (Shubin) is present. Apparently, Fina and McGettigan have told him to pound salt and that they would ONLY question AM by himself. Neither of them apparently want anything to do with Shubin. Shubin has now claimed that AM has admitted to having "both oral and anal sex" with Sandusky "over 100 times".
On 2/28/2012, Shubin was able to get an Inspector not associated with the AG's office (M.J. Corricelli) to sit down with him (Shubin) and AM. Shubin and AM had two more meetings with this Inspector on 3/8 and 3/16/2012. In the 3/8 meeting and the 3/16 meeting, according to the Inspector's memorandums, AM admitted to differing and confusing allegations of sexual contact with Sandusky (nothing close to what Shubin claimed he would say).
Of course, up to this point, Shubin had denied Fina, McGettigan, and Sassano access to AM. All of a sudden, he tells Sassano he will allow him to meet with AM and interview him on 4/3/12 as long as Corricelli comes with him. When Corricelli shows up at Shubin's office to drive them to Sassano's, AM is a no show. However Shubin has a 3 page statement Shubin claims is AM's statements of Sandusky's oral and anal sexual abuse. Sassano and Corricelli both strongly suspect the statement is actually written by Shubin, and Sassano decides to not even take a copy.
Shubin then hides AM away where no one can talk to him until after the trial. The next thing we hear from AM (after he and Shubin extort their 3 million dollars from Penn State) is from an investigator (Ken Cummings) who interviews AM, where AM stands by what he told Joe Amendola in November 2011. Basically, that Sandusky is innocent.
If this ever gets back to trial (highly unlikely), and Vic 2 takes the stand (I do think Lindsay and Sandusky will call him), I think the fireworks will fly.
Victim 2 is on the potential witness list if there is a Sandusky retrial. The situation with him and Shubin is beyond fascinating.
As you all know, Vic 2 was Sandusky's biggest supporter before Shubin gets ahold of him sometime before December 13, 2011. Shubin then refuses to allow McGettigan or anyone from the AG's office to talk to AM before the 12/13/2011 Sandusky preliminary hearing (I'm assuming because he hasn't yet gotten AM to flip).
Shubin is then denied access to the 12/16/2011 Curley Schultz preliminary hearing (I assume in retaliation by the State for not allowing access to AM).
On 2/10/2012, after another Sandusky hearing, Shubin gets into a heated argument with Sassano about McGettigan, and Fina. He demands that AM NOW be interviewed as a "Victim". But ONLY if he (Shubin) is present. Apparently, Fina and McGettigan have told him to pound salt and that they would ONLY question AM by himself. Neither of them apparently want anything to do with Shubin. Shubin has now claimed that AM has admitted to having "both oral and anal sex" with Sandusky "over 100 times".
On 2/28/2012, Shubin was able to get an Inspector not associated with the AG's office (M.J. Corricelli) to sit down with him (Shubin) and AM. Shubin and AM had two more meetings with this Inspector on 3/8 and 3/16/2012. In the 3/8 meeting and the 3/16 meeting, according to the Inspector's memorandums, AM admitted to differing and confusing allegations of sexual contact with Sandusky (nothing close to what Shubin claimed he would say).
Of course, up to this point, Shubin had denied Fina, McGettigan, and Sassano access to AM. All of a sudden, he tells Sassano he will allow him to meet with AM and interview him on 4/3/12 as long as Corricelli comes with him. When Corricelli shows up at Shubin's office to drive them to Sassano's, AM is a no show. However Shubin has a 3 page statement Shubin claims is AM's statements of Sandusky's oral and anal sexual abuse. Sassano and Corricelli both strongly suspect the statement is actually written by Shubin, and Sassano decides to not even take a copy.
Shubin then hides AM away where no one can talk to him until after the trial. The next thing we hear from AM (after he and Shubin extort their 3 million dollars from Penn State) is from an investigator (Ken Cummings) who interviews AM, where AM stands by what he told Joe Amendola in November 2011. Basically, that Sandusky is innocent.
If this ever gets back to trial (highly unlikely), and Vic 2 takes the stand (I do think Lindsay and Sandusky will call him), I think the fireworks will fly.
I believe mm was there that night but his reason for being there (putting shoes in locker?) never made sense to me. Drunk or sober
testified that he had not been drinking. will be interesting to hear from his gf at the time
