You can at times come up with responses that I don't totally disagree with JJ.
1. I believe the Freeh Report is a farce in spite of having some accurate information.
The e-mails and notes are the most damning part of the Freeh report
2. Thank you for acknowledging that MM did not witness an anal rape. MM wrote in an email to Jonelle Eschbach that she twisted his words in her writing of the grand jury presentment.
I didn't say Sandusky was not penetrating the child. I think he was. McQueary could not see penetration, however. I think that there was enough to send this the IDSI charge to a jury.
3, Joe may or may not have been able to continue on the field, but he absolutely did not deserve to be summarily fired over the phone after 61 years of commendable service to the University
I do think he deserved better. And I don't think was the "mastermind" behind everything, either. That doesn't say that he is blameless.
4. Thank you for also realizing that Penn State may have made payments to some accusers that were not based on factual complaints.
I said that I don't know. I don't know what the vetting process was.
How do you know what happened between V2 and Sandusky was sexual activity? The only individual to ever claim to be V2 said it was not.
We know that the person claiming to be Victim 2, was not Victim 2.