The spate of coaching changes got me wondering how to measure a coach’s success at a given school. I'm sure each school defines success and evaluates a coach’s performance differently. Not all have access to the same level of athlete/coaching talent, resources, facilities, etc, or the same commitment to athletics. For one school, anything short of a top 5 team finish at NCAAs would be deemed a disappointment, while another might be thrilled just to send one wrestler to the tournament.
I thought it might be interesting to look at how schools have historically performed at NCAAs and what kind of trends exist over a given coach’s tenure. I’m not saying success at the NCAAs is the most important factor to consider. I’m sure it isn’t. But it’s one factor, and we can at least measure it.
So I put together the table below showing schools that have had some degree of success at NCAAs between 2005-2018, who the coach was for each school at the end of the 2017-18 season, and how long the coach had been there. Tenure is noted numerically and by the yellow highlighted cells. I also highlighted in green the 3 seasons when Cael was at Iowa State. I randomly picked 15 years as a historical snapshot, but somehow ended up with only 14.
I share this here in case others find it interesting, amusing or whatever. One thing that jumped out at me is how many long-term coaches there are with mediocre to poor records at NCAAs -- e.g., Goldman at Indiana (25 yrs); Borelli at C. Michigan (26 yrs); Flynn at Edinboro (21 yrs); Martin at Old Dominion (14 yrs); Goodale at Rutgers (11 yrs).
Also, though not noted here, I was surprised to see that there were years when some schools ended up with less than zero points for the nat'l tourney. For example, Michigan State ended up with -0.5 points in 2015. Anyone know the backstory there? Were they gunning for the record for unsportsmanlike conduct that year or what?
I thought it might be interesting to look at how schools have historically performed at NCAAs and what kind of trends exist over a given coach’s tenure. I’m not saying success at the NCAAs is the most important factor to consider. I’m sure it isn’t. But it’s one factor, and we can at least measure it.
So I put together the table below showing schools that have had some degree of success at NCAAs between 2005-2018, who the coach was for each school at the end of the 2017-18 season, and how long the coach had been there. Tenure is noted numerically and by the yellow highlighted cells. I also highlighted in green the 3 seasons when Cael was at Iowa State. I randomly picked 15 years as a historical snapshot, but somehow ended up with only 14.
I share this here in case others find it interesting, amusing or whatever. One thing that jumped out at me is how many long-term coaches there are with mediocre to poor records at NCAAs -- e.g., Goldman at Indiana (25 yrs); Borelli at C. Michigan (26 yrs); Flynn at Edinboro (21 yrs); Martin at Old Dominion (14 yrs); Goodale at Rutgers (11 yrs).
Also, though not noted here, I was surprised to see that there were years when some schools ended up with less than zero points for the nat'l tourney. For example, Michigan State ended up with -0.5 points in 2015. Anyone know the backstory there? Were they gunning for the record for unsportsmanlike conduct that year or what?