The Same Staffer That Made the Recording of Trump's Call to the Georgia Secretary of State Also Leaked a Falsified Version of the Call to the Washington Post?
—Ace
So says the American Conservative.
Of course, we're all wondering if this same person then deleted the only copy of the phone call recording, so that her falsified account of the call could never be refuted by comparison with the actual recording.
What the **** is going on in the Georgia Secretary of State office?
This is what I was thinking about when I wondered why "Republicans" go along with shit like Stacy Abrams "count every illegal vote" plan -- what racial blackmail material do Democrats have on these miscreants?
Why was this leftwing **** leaking to the Washington Post at all?
It's one thing if a single news outlet publishes a bogus anonymously sourced "scoop."
It's another thing entirely if multiple newsrooms claim they independently "confirmed" the bogus "scoop" with anonymous sources of their own.
The former can reasonably be explained away as a simple error; the latter is not so simple. It's unrealistic so many sources would be wrong about the same thing. It's more likely competing newsgroups spoke with the same anonymous person or people, which leads to uncomfortable questions about whether the media were intentionally manipulated and whether this is a regular occurrence.
ACE OF SPADES - http://ace.mu.nu
—Ace
So says the American Conservative.
Of course, we're all wondering if this same person then deleted the only copy of the phone call recording, so that her falsified account of the call could never be refuted by comparison with the actual recording.
What the **** is going on in the Georgia Secretary of State office?
This is what I was thinking about when I wondered why "Republicans" go along with shit like Stacy Abrams "count every illegal vote" plan -- what racial blackmail material do Democrats have on these miscreants?
Why was this leftwing **** leaking to the Washington Post at all?
It's one thing if a single news outlet publishes a bogus anonymously sourced "scoop."
It's another thing entirely if multiple newsrooms claim they independently "confirmed" the bogus "scoop" with anonymous sources of their own.
The former can reasonably be explained away as a simple error; the latter is not so simple. It's unrealistic so many sources would be wrong about the same thing. It's more likely competing newsgroups spoke with the same anonymous person or people, which leads to uncomfortable questions about whether the media were intentionally manipulated and whether this is a regular occurrence.
ACE OF SPADES - http://ace.mu.nu
