I'll bet it is difficult. It would serve us right if they all just up and resigned,
I feel certain that you are crying buckets for poor Paul Silvis
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'll bet it is difficult. It would serve us right if they all just up and resigned,
I detest all those bast@#ds.I feel certain that you are crying buckets for poor Paul Silvis
Think you meant to say rat bast@#dsI detest all those bast@#ds.
That's tragic. Just consider his difficulty of being a trustee in the post JS era, being on the Kish bank boards and Head Coach at SilcoTek. Gee whiz. He probably lives in squalor that Dickens couldn't have described. I empathize with Coach."Coach" Silvis is a vile person. One of the three PSU men charged (C-S-S) told me the following anecdote. This happened a while back before the main charges were dismissed. He was at a State College area event when PS walks up to him. PS says "you know, none of us believe the Freeh report." PS then complains and whines about how difficult it is to be a trustee in the post-Sandusky era. Talk about a thoughtless, self-absorbed horse's @ss.
"Coach" Silvis is a vile person. One of the three PSU men charged (C-S-S) told me the following anecdote. This happened a while back before the main charges were dismissed. He was at a State College area event when PS walks up to him. PS says "you know, none of us believe the Freeh report." PS then complains and whines about how difficult it is to be a trustee in the post-Sandusky era. Talk about a thoughtless, self-absorbed horse's @ss.
Scott himself said an "athletic department source" informed him about what Silvis is (supposedly) doing. That "athletic department source" would be the tangible evidence.
"Coach" Silvis is a vile person. One of the three PSU men charged (C-S-S) told me the following anecdote. This happened a while back before the main charges were dismissed. He was at a State College area event when PS walks up to him. PS says "you know, none of us believe the Freeh report." PS then complains and whines about how difficult it is to be a trustee in the post-Sandusky era. Talk about a thoughtless, self-absorbed horse's @ss.
Michy is back out of the hole I see. .... that is a bunch of BS
How you read that as 'spitting in his bosses faces....' is simply beyond comprehension.
You got some issues Michy
I told you this before and I'll tell you again - Joe is the only one we know for sure who did exactly what he should have - by continuing to keep the focus on him you (and anyone who thinks like you) only serve to put more children in harm's way.
So if you truly care about the children - put the focus where it belongs!!
Silvis is pure scum.
Organized crime had a sense of ethics, ask Frank Sheeran. If you f¥cked up you paid the price. If you stepped out of line, you paid the price. The OGBOT remains a narcissistic cloister of master cluster-F¥ckers who have yet to pay for their vile actions. But their comeuppance is fast approaching.Sadly, this is totally believable.
Yet again another example of how these guys have no respect for the alumni and friends of PSU, much less the Paterno family or C/S/S families.
Lies, planting misleading or outright false stories in the media, hiding information, the whole Freeh-Ring Circus disaster.... They cannot work past their own egos and hubris. As I've said, being behind them is like cheering for organized crime.
Dear Sue,
We apologize for firing your late husband over the phone back in November 2011. That was incredibly poor form: that news should have been delivered in a face-to-face conversation. We definitely could have waited until 10 AM Thursday instead of rushing to announce the news at 10 PM Wednesday, thus ensuring that face-to-face conversation had occurred.
We know this is years after the actual action, but we do feel the need to formally apologize for such.
Sincerely,
November 2011 Penn State Board of Trustees.
------------------
If that happened, would Sue/Scott accept?
Look what the wind blew in.Would they accept? The Board already issued such an apology back on March 12, 2012 and we haven't heard of any JVP family member accepting so the answer appears to be clearly no. This from the official Board statement of March 12th, 2012:
"The Board spent hours on conference calls between Saturday, Nov. 5, and Tuesday, Nov. 8, discussing appropriate action and our fiduciary responsibility as the Trustees. On Wednesday evening, Nov. 9, we met in person in State College. At about 9 pm, we unanimously made the difficult decision that Coach Paterno’s failure of leadership required his removal as football coach.
We are sorry for the unfortunate way we had to deliver the news on the telephone about an hour later to Coach Paterno. However, we saw no better alternative. Because Coach Paterno’s home was surrounded by media representatives, photographers and others, we did not believe there was a dignified, private and secure way to send Board representatives to meet with him there. Nor did we believe it would be wise to wait until the next morning, since we believed it was probable that Coach Paterno would hear the news beforehand from other sources, which would be inappropriate.
Thus, we sent a representative of the Athletic Department to ask Coach Paterno to call us. When the coach called, the Board member who received the call planned to tell him that (1) the Board had decided unanimously to remove him as coach; (2) the Board regretted having to deliver the message over the telephone; and (3) his employment contract would continue, including all financial benefits and his continued status as a tenured faculty member. However, after this Board member communicated the first message, Coach Paterno ended the call, so the second and third messages could not be delivered."
If the Paterno family is looking for an apology for the actual decision to remove JVP, they shouldn't hold their breath. The Board entered into a decision for his removal because they believed it was in the best interest of the university which supersedes the interest of any one individual and/or family as it should.
"The Pennsylvania State University Board of Trustees has been asked by members of the Penn State community, including students, faculty, staff and alumni, to state clearly its reasons for the difficult decisions that were made unanimously on the evening of Nov. 9, 2011 — to remove Graham Spanier as president of the University and Joe Paterno as head football coach for the remaining three games of the 2011 season. Our decisions were guided by our obligation as Trustees, always, to put the interests of the University first."
Rather than looking for apologies and suing the university, perhaps the JVP family should consider thanking the university for providing a venue for the family patriarchs memorial service.
Would they accept? The Board already issued such an apology back on March 12, 2012 and we haven't heard of any JVP family member accepting so the answer appears to be clearly no. This from the official Board statement of March 12th, 2012:
"The Board spent hours on conference calls between Saturday, Nov. 5, and Tuesday, Nov. 8, discussing appropriate action and our fiduciary responsibility as the Trustees. On Wednesday evening, Nov. 9, we met in person in State College. At about 9 pm, we unanimously made the difficult decision that Coach Paterno’s failure of leadership required his removal as football coach.
We are sorry for the unfortunate way we had to deliver the news on the telephone about an hour later to Coach Paterno. However, we saw no better alternative. Because Coach Paterno’s home was surrounded by media representatives, photographers and others, we did not believe there was a dignified, private and secure way to send Board representatives to meet with him there. Nor did we believe it would be wise to wait until the next morning, since we believed it was probable that Coach Paterno would hear the news beforehand from other sources, which would be inappropriate.
Thus, we sent a representative of the Athletic Department to ask Coach Paterno to call us. When the coach called, the Board member who received the call planned to tell him that (1) the Board had decided unanimously to remove him as coach; (2) the Board regretted having to deliver the message over the telephone; and (3) his employment contract would continue, including all financial benefits and his continued status as a tenured faculty member. However, after this Board member communicated the first message, Coach Paterno ended the call, so the second and third messages could not be delivered."
If the Paterno family is looking for an apology for the actual decision to remove JVP, they shouldn't hold their breath. The Board entered into a decision for his removal because they believed it was in the best interest of the university which supersedes the interest of any one individual and/or family as it should.
"The Pennsylvania State University Board of Trustees has been asked by members of the Penn State community, including students, faculty, staff and alumni, to state clearly its reasons for the difficult decisions that were made unanimously on the evening of Nov. 9, 2011 — to remove Graham Spanier as president of the University and Joe Paterno as head football coach for the remaining three games of the 2011 season. Our decisions were guided by our obligation as Trustees, always, to put the interests of the University first."
Rather than looking for apologies and suing the university, perhaps the JVP family should consider thanking the university for providing a venue for the family patriarchs memorial service.
Are you f¥cking serious? After being outed this is the best you've got?WOWWould they accept? The Board already issued such an apology back on March 12, 2012 and we haven't heard of any JVP family member accepting so the answer appears to be clearly no. This from the official Board statement of March 12th, 2012:
"The Board spent hours on conference calls between Saturday, Nov. 5, and Tuesday, Nov. 8, discussing appropriate action and our fiduciary responsibility as the Trustees. On Wednesday evening, Nov. 9, we met in person in State College. At about 9 pm, we unanimously made the difficult decision that Coach Paterno’s failure of leadership required his removal as football coach.
We are sorry for the unfortunate way we had to deliver the news on the telephone about an hour later to Coach Paterno. However, we saw no better alternative. Because Coach Paterno’s home was surrounded by media representatives, photographers and others, we did not believe there was a dignified, private and secure way to send Board representatives to meet with him there. Nor did we believe it would be wise to wait until the next morning, since we believed it was probable that Coach Paterno would hear the news beforehand from other sources, which would be inappropriate.
Thus, we sent a representative of the Athletic Department to ask Coach Paterno to call us. When the coach called, the Board member who received the call planned to tell him that (1) the Board had decided unanimously to remove him as coach; (2) the Board regretted having to deliver the message over the telephone; and (3) his employment contract would continue, including all financial benefits and his continued status as a tenured faculty member. However, after this Board member communicated the first message, Coach Paterno ended the call, so the second and third messages could not be delivered."
If the Paterno family is looking for an apology for the actual decision to remove JVP, they shouldn't hold their breath. The Board entered into a decision for his removal because they believed it was in the best interest of the university which supersedes the interest of any one individual and/or family as it should.
"The Pennsylvania State University Board of Trustees has been asked by members of the Penn State community, including students, faculty, staff and alumni, to state clearly its reasons for the difficult decisions that were made unanimously on the evening of Nov. 9, 2011 — to remove Graham Spanier as president of the University and Joe Paterno as head football coach for the remaining three games of the 2011 season. Our decisions were guided by our obligation as Trustees, always, to put the interests of the University first."
Rather than looking for apologies and suing the university, perhaps the JVP family should consider thanking the university for providing a venue for the family patriarchs memorial service.
If the Paterno family is looking for an apology for the actual decision to remove JVP, they shouldn't hold their breath. The Board entered into a decision for his removal because they believed it was in the best interest of the university which supersedes the interest of any one individual and/or family as it should.
Are you f¥cking serious? After being outed this is the best you've got?WOW
Would they accept? The Board already issued such an apology back on March 12, 2012 and we haven't heard of any JVP family member accepting so the answer appears to be clearly no. This from the official Board statement of March 12th, 2012:
"The Board spent hours on conference calls between Saturday, Nov. 5, and Tuesday, Nov. 8, discussing appropriate action and our fiduciary responsibility as the Trustees. On Wednesday evening, Nov. 9, we met in person in State College. At about 9 pm, we unanimously made the difficult decision that Coach Paterno’s failure of leadership required his removal as football coach.
We are sorry for the unfortunate way we had to deliver the news on the telephone about an hour later to Coach Paterno. However, we saw no better alternative. Because Coach Paterno’s home was surrounded by media representatives, photographers and others, we did not believe there was a dignified, private and secure way to send Board representatives to meet with him there. Nor did we believe it would be wise to wait until the next morning, since we believed it was probable that Coach Paterno would hear the news beforehand from other sources, which would be inappropriate.
Thus, we sent a representative of the Athletic Department to ask Coach Paterno to call us. When the coach called, the Board member who received the call planned to tell him that (1) the Board had decided unanimously to remove him as coach; (2) the Board regretted having to deliver the message over the telephone; and (3) his employment contract would continue, including all financial benefits and his continued status as a tenured faculty member. However, after this Board member communicated the first message, Coach Paterno ended the call, so the second and third messages could not be delivered."
If the Paterno family is looking for an apology for the actual decision to remove JVP, they shouldn't hold their breath. The Board entered into a decision for his removal because they believed it was in the best interest of the university which supersedes the interest of any one individual and/or family as it should.
"The Pennsylvania State University Board of Trustees has been asked by members of the Penn State community, including students, faculty, staff and alumni, to state clearly its reasons for the difficult decisions that were made unanimously on the evening of Nov. 9, 2011 — to remove Graham Spanier as president of the University and Joe Paterno as head football coach for the remaining three games of the 2011 season. Our decisions were guided by our obligation as Trustees, always, to put the interests of the University first."
Rather than looking for apologies and suing the university, perhaps the JVP family should consider thanking the university for providing a venue for the family patriarchs memorial service.
Man, Mich is something isn't he.. Sometimes I wonder why he is so damn adamant about the Paterno's suing the University. He goes on and on about other people (the BOT or TSM) having no guilt in this entire tragic saga and that the Paterno's should leave them and sue the University.. Mich, why are you trying to shift the blame?! I have a feeling that you have an ulterior motive here by convincing the masses that the Paterno's should sue the University. The way you go on and on about it and deflect blame is unbelievable!
Righteous!!!You are tangible evidence that God gave some people $hit for brains to play a cruel joke on the rest of humanity......
Would they accept? The Board already issued such an apology back on March 12, 2012 and we haven't heard of any JVP family member accepting so the answer appears to be clearly no. This from the official Board statement of March 12th, 2012:
"The Board spent hours on conference calls between Saturday, Nov. 5, and Tuesday, Nov. 8, discussing appropriate action and our fiduciary responsibility as the Trustees. On Wednesday evening, Nov. 9, we met in person in State College. At about 9 pm, we unanimously made the difficult decision that Coach Paterno’s failure of leadership required his removal as football coach.
We are sorry for the unfortunate way we had to deliver the news on the telephone about an hour later to Coach Paterno. However, we saw no better alternative. Because Coach Paterno’s home was surrounded by media representatives, photographers and others, we did not believe there was a dignified, private and secure way to send Board representatives to meet with him there. Nor did we believe it would be wise to wait until the next morning, since we believed it was probable that Coach Paterno would hear the news beforehand from other sources, which would be inappropriate.
Thus, we sent a representative of the Athletic Department to ask Coach Paterno to call us. When the coach called, the Board member who received the call planned to tell him that (1) the Board had decided unanimously to remove him as coach; (2) the Board regretted having to deliver the message over the telephone; and (3) his employment contract would continue, including all financial benefits and his continued status as a tenured faculty member. However, after this Board member communicated the first message, Coach Paterno ended the call, so the second and third messages could not be delivered."
If the Paterno family is looking for an apology for the actual decision to remove JVP, they shouldn't hold their breath. The Board entered into a decision for his removal because they believed it was in the best interest of the university which supersedes the interest of any one individual and/or family as it should.
"The Pennsylvania State University Board of Trustees has been asked by members of the Penn State community, including students, faculty, staff and alumni, to state clearly its reasons for the difficult decisions that were made unanimously on the evening of Nov. 9, 2011 — to remove Graham Spanier as president of the University and Joe Paterno as head football coach for the remaining three games of the 2011 season. Our decisions were guided by our obligation as Trustees, always, to put the interests of the University first."
Rather than looking for apologies and suing the university, perhaps the JVP family should consider thanking the university for providing a venue for the family patriarchs memorial service.
Would they accept? The Board already issued such an apology back on March 12, 2012 and we haven't heard of any JVP family member accepting so the answer appears to be clearly no. This from the official Board statement of March 12th, 2012:
"The Board spent hours on conference calls between Saturday, Nov. 5, and Tuesday, Nov. 8, discussing appropriate action and our fiduciary responsibility as the Trustees. On Wednesday evening, Nov. 9, we met in person in State College. At about 9 pm, we unanimously made the difficult decision that Coach Paterno’s failure of leadership required his removal as football coach.
We are sorry for the unfortunate way we had to deliver the news on the telephone about an hour later to Coach Paterno. However, we saw no better alternative. Because Coach Paterno’s home was surrounded by media representatives, photographers and others, we did not believe there was a dignified, private and secure way to send Board representatives to meet with him there. Nor did we believe it would be wise to wait until the next morning, since we believed it was probable that Coach Paterno would hear the news beforehand from other sources, which would be inappropriate.
Thus, we sent a representative of the Athletic Department to ask Coach Paterno to call us. When the coach called, the Board member who received the call planned to tell him that (1) the Board had decided unanimously to remove him as coach; (2) the Board regretted having to deliver the message over the telephone; and (3) his employment contract would continue, including all financial benefits and his continued status as a tenured faculty member. However, after this Board member communicated the first message, Coach Paterno ended the call, so the second and third messages could not be delivered."
If the Paterno family is looking for an apology for the actual decision to remove JVP, they shouldn't hold their breath. The Board entered into a decision for his removal because they believed it was in the best interest of the university which supersedes the interest of any one individual and/or family as it should.
"The Pennsylvania State University Board of Trustees has been asked by members of the Penn State community, including students, faculty, staff and alumni, to state clearly its reasons for the difficult decisions that were made unanimously on the evening of Nov. 9, 2011 — to remove Graham Spanier as president of the University and Joe Paterno as head football coach for the remaining three games of the 2011 season. Our decisions were guided by our obligation as Trustees, always, to put the interests of the University first."
Rather than looking for apologies and suing the university, perhaps the JVP family should consider thanking the university for providing a venue for the family patriarchs memorial service.
Would they accept? The Board already issued such an apology back on March 12, 2012 and we haven't heard of any JVP family member accepting so the answer appears to be clearly no. This from the official Board statement of March 12th, 2012:
"The Board spent hours on conference calls between Saturday, Nov. 5, and Tuesday, Nov. 8, discussing appropriate action and our fiduciary responsibility as the Trustees. On Wednesday evening, Nov. 9, we met in person in State College. At about 9 pm, we unanimously made the difficult decision that Coach Paterno’s failure of leadership required his removal as football coach.
We are sorry for the unfortunate way we had to deliver the news on the telephone about an hour later to Coach Paterno. However, we saw no better alternative. Because Coach Paterno’s home was surrounded by media representatives, photographers and others, we did not believe there was a dignified, private and secure way to send Board representatives to meet with him there. Nor did we believe it would be wise to wait until the next morning, since we believed it was probable that Coach Paterno would hear the news beforehand from other sources, which would be inappropriate.
Thus, we sent a representative of the Athletic Department to ask Coach Paterno to call us. When the coach called, the Board member who received the call planned to tell him that (1) the Board had decided unanimously to remove him as coach; (2) the Board regretted having to deliver the message over the telephone; and (3) his employment contract would continue, including all financial benefits and his continued status as a tenured faculty member. However, after this Board member communicated the first message, Coach Paterno ended the call, so the second and third messages could not be delivered."
If the Paterno family is looking for an apology for the actual decision to remove JVP, they shouldn't hold their breath. The Board entered into a decision for his removal because they believed it was in the best interest of the university which supersedes the interest of any one individual and/or family as it should.
"The Pennsylvania State University Board of Trustees has been asked by members of the Penn State community, including students, faculty, staff and alumni, to state clearly its reasons for the difficult decisions that were made unanimously on the evening of Nov. 9, 2011 — to remove Graham Spanier as president of the University and Joe Paterno as head football coach for the remaining three games of the 2011 season. Our decisions were guided by our obligation as Trustees, always, to put the interests of the University first."
Rather than looking for apologies and suing the university, perhaps the JVP family should consider thanking the university for providing a venue for the family patriarchs memorial service.
Except it wasn't in the best interest of the university. Neither was a fraudulent Freeh report who's purpose was to defend the bot rather than investigate events.
Would they accept? The Board already issued such an apology back on March 12, 2012 and we haven't heard of any JVP family member accepting so the answer appears to be clearly no. This from the official Board statement of March 12th, 2012:
"The Board spent hours on conference calls between Saturday, Nov. 5, and Tuesday, Nov. 8, discussing appropriate action and our fiduciary responsibility as the Trustees. On Wednesday evening, Nov. 9, we met in person in State College. At about 9 pm, we unanimously made the difficult decision that Coach Paterno’s failure of leadership required his removal as football coach.
We are sorry for the unfortunate way we had to deliver the news on the telephone about an hour later to Coach Paterno. However, we saw no better alternative. Because Coach Paterno’s home was surrounded by media representatives, photographers and others, we did not believe there was a dignified, private and secure way to send Board representatives to meet with him there. Nor did we believe it would be wise to wait until the next morning, since we believed it was probable that Coach Paterno would hear the news beforehand from other sources, which would be inappropriate.
Thus, we sent a representative of the Athletic Department to ask Coach Paterno to call us. When the coach called, the Board member who received the call planned to tell him that (1) the Board had decided unanimously to remove him as coach; (2) the Board regretted having to deliver the message over the telephone; and (3) his employment contract would continue, including all financial benefits and his continued status as a tenured faculty member. However, after this Board member communicated the first message, Coach Paterno ended the call, so the second and third messages could not be delivered."
If the Paterno family is looking for an apology for the actual decision to remove JVP, they shouldn't hold their breath. The Board entered into a decision for his removal because they believed it was in the best interest of the university which supersedes the interest of any one individual and/or family as it should.
"The Pennsylvania State University Board of Trustees has been asked by members of the Penn State community, including students, faculty, staff and alumni, to state clearly its reasons for the difficult decisions that were made unanimously on the evening of Nov. 9, 2011 — to remove Graham Spanier as president of the University and Joe Paterno as head football coach for the remaining three games of the 2011 season. Our decisions were guided by our obligation as Trustees, always, to put the interests of the University first."
Rather than looking for apologies and suing the university, perhaps the JVP family should consider thanking the university for providing a venue for the family patriarchs memorial service.
"Rather than looking for apologies and suing the university, perhaps the JVP family should consider thanking the university for providing a venue for the family patriarchs memorial service."
Wow. This is perhaps the most misguided comment, and from some guy sitting at a keyboard in a rental in New Jersey.
John - your pal Ken Frazier effed up. The timeline of events says what it says and no amount of #handwaving is going to change what that timeline says. When given the reins because he claimed he had plenty of experience dealing with grand jury presentments, Mr. "No Do Overs" should have simply told the media the University will wait for due process, for the FACTS to come out and to sit down and shut up until those FACTS come out.
Ken Frazier, along with the Board as whole FAILED to serve the greater good of the University, it failed the students, faculty, staff and alumni, as well as failing the surrounding community and the commonwealth.
That is who they owe the apology to. I have yet to see that issued.
Give Ken my love. <smooches>
Would they accept? The Board already issued such an apology back on March 12, 2012 and we haven't heard of any JVP family member accepting so the answer appears to be clearly no. This from the official Board statement of March 12th, 2012:
"The Board spent hours on conference calls between Saturday, Nov. 5, and Tuesday, Nov. 8, discussing appropriate action and our fiduciary responsibility as the Trustees. On Wednesday evening, Nov. 9, we met in person in State College. At about 9 pm, we unanimously made the difficult decision that Coach Paterno’s failure of leadership required his removal as football coach.
We are sorry for the unfortunate way we had to deliver the news on the telephone about an hour later to Coach Paterno. However, we saw no better alternative. Because Coach Paterno’s home was surrounded by media representatives, photographers and others, we did not believe there was a dignified, private and secure way to send Board representatives to meet with him there. Nor did we believe it would be wise to wait until the next morning, since we believed it was probable that Coach Paterno would hear the news beforehand from other sources, which would be inappropriate.
Thus, we sent a representative of the Athletic Department to ask Coach Paterno to call us. When the coach called, the Board member who received the call planned to tell him that (1) the Board had decided unanimously to remove him as coach; (2) the Board regretted having to deliver the message over the telephone; and (3) his employment contract would continue, including all financial benefits and his continued status as a tenured faculty member. However, after this Board member communicated the first message, Coach Paterno ended the call, so the second and third messages could not be delivered."
If the Paterno family is looking for an apology for the actual decision to remove JVP, they shouldn't hold their breath. The Board entered into a decision for his removal because they believed it was in the best interest of the university which supersedes the interest of any one individual and/or family as it should.
"The Pennsylvania State University Board of Trustees has been asked by members of the Penn State community, including students, faculty, staff and alumni, to state clearly its reasons for the difficult decisions that were made unanimously on the evening of Nov. 9, 2011 — to remove Graham Spanier as president of the University and Joe Paterno as head football coach for the remaining three games of the 2011 season. Our decisions were guided by our obligation as Trustees, always, to put the interests of the University first."
Rather than looking for apologies and suing the university, perhaps the JVP family should consider thanking the university for providing a venue for the family patriarchs memorial service.
If you look at it from the angle that these people thought Joe aided Sandusky in his ability to sexually abuse children for many years, their decision to grant the Paternos access to campus facilities to honor Joe is another disgrace by the decision makers.
Why would you knowingly allow a child sexual abuse enabler to be honored on your campus?
Great post.
Exactly right. How in the hell do you allow the Paterno's to use anything or be a part of the school in any way shape or form if your conclusion this was a COVER UP for the football program? That in itself is the most hypocritical line of thinking anyone could possibly have. The BoT fired Joe, then had Freeh proclaim the school COVERED UP for Jerry for football, but then had Joe's funeral there because they feel it's morally ok to actively hide pedohiles?
CR66 can't even think straight anymore as he's spinning his tires so hard in the mud. His post makes absolutely no sense unless he thinks the Freeh report was wrong.
And Letter to BOT...
" Dear BOT,
It is apparent that due to your failed leadership and decision making which has not only helped tarnish the very institution you are in place to protect along with the mind boggling steps put in place that have cost the University well over $100 million that you can no longer hold your positions and thus you are terminated immediately.
You still receive your football tickets though you will be moved to the top row of the visitors section where you can appropriately cheer with the opposing fan bases.
Also any acknowledgement in the past such as having names placed on buildings shall be removed immediately"
Your truly ,
Nittany Nation
Great post.
Exactly right. How in the hell do you allow the Paterno's to use anything or be a part of the school in any way shape or form if your conclusion this was a COVER UP for the football program? That in itself is the most hypocritical line of thinking anyone could possibly have. The BoT fired Joe, then had Freeh proclaim the school COVERED UP for Jerry for football, but then had Joe's funeral there because they feel it's morally ok to actively hide pedohiles?
CR66 can't even think straight anymore as he's spinning his tires so hard in the mud. His post makes absolutely no sense unless he thinks the Freeh report was wrong.
Would they accept? The Board already issued such an apology back on March 12, 2012 and we haven't heard of any JVP family member accepting so the answer appears to be clearly no. This from the official Board statement of March 12th, 2012:
Rather than looking for apologies and suing the university, perhaps the JVP family should consider thanking the university for providing a venue for the family patriarchs memorial service.
So, this John Zipay is the guy who has been posting from the bunker deep inside that relic from The Third Reich, Jasna Polana.I take back everything I said about not feeling like an idiot when I read MichnittLion's posts.
When I read Zipay's posts, I feel like a Nobel Prize Laureate.
That's even better.