Mike C.'s Friday Mailbag
- Thread starter slushhead
- Start date
I'll let Tom add in his narrative.
For those keeping track, this is week 53, and despite promises he tweeted, no response to Flo's article about Olympic reffing corruption from Foley.
Actually counted 3 questions from Mike C. (Fix vs. Tomasello, VMI coach leaving, Caldwell MMA).Two -- count 'em, two -- questions from Mike C. this week, and a question from Mike S . . .
LINK
I'll let Tom add in his narrative.
Though I only counted, stopped reading after Foley's dense (but I repeat myself): reason for picking Fix: because he thinks Fix might be better against Georgia and Russia
I owe you an apology, Jefe . . . I had totally forgotten you already used the "Mike C. Mailbag" crack. And apparently, I can't count, either. I think I'm going crazy.
https://bwi.forums.rivals.com/threads/foleys-friday-mailbag-for-9-15-17.183978/
BTW, I sent you a PM on FOS.
https://bwi.forums.rivals.com/threads/foleys-friday-mailbag-for-9-15-17.183978/
BTW, I sent you a PM on FOS.
A few of the answers Foley offered I had to read a couple of times to see if I had missed something in the logic path.
Just like we just compiled a list of Spykerisms, maybe we should do a list of Foleyisms or Mike C-isms.
For example: Iran is safer than Iowa.
Holy smokes ... that Ty Walz video. He's always been high on my Favorite Non-PSU Wrestler Big Board, but I might have to move him to the top (While I'm at it, I'll also be dropping all of the Iowa wrestlers several spots without explanation because of alchemy.)
All right Im bored but...
ball bag Date - total Qs - Mike C Qs
10/6 - 6 - 3
9/29 - 8 - 2
9/22 - 9 - 4
9/15 - 3 - 1 (One jammenz Q of the 3)
9/8 - 6 - 3
9/1 - 7 - 3
8/18 - 7 - 5
8/11 - 4 -2
8/4 - 8 - 5
7/28 - 6 - 4
Ok now annoyed....you guys get the point.
Whats surprising is that Mike C never jumps into the comment sections to argue, agree, clarify TRs response. you would think such a fan boy would have maybe a rebuttal once in awhile....
ball bag Date - total Qs - Mike C Qs
10/6 - 6 - 3
9/29 - 8 - 2
9/22 - 9 - 4
9/15 - 3 - 1 (One jammenz Q of the 3)
9/8 - 6 - 3
9/1 - 7 - 3
8/18 - 7 - 5
8/11 - 4 -2
8/4 - 8 - 5
7/28 - 6 - 4
Ok now annoyed....you guys get the point.
Whats surprising is that Mike C never jumps into the comment sections to argue, agree, clarify TRs response. you would think such a fan boy would have maybe a rebuttal once in awhile....
From that 2+ mo sample, exactly half (32 of 64) of Mike C's questions came from Foley. I mean, Foley's questions came from Mike C. Hard to tell the difference sometimes.
He seems to be about as statistically clandestine as Mamiashvilli and the Olympic referee system.
My linguistic analysis of Jammen has yielded a profile that fits half a dozen fan bases.
No, I got Foley to give up his hypothetical cartoon figure wrestling matchups.
And Dunker, you do not fit the profile I developed for Andrewmah.
Whatever floats your boat. Er, that might not be the best phrase for this one.
It's gotta be better than crapping the bed like the Goofers.
Similar threads
