Minnesota football players suspended due to sex crime

[Franklin_Restores_TheTradition]

no its not, re read that , it is 16 if the two aren't more than 4 years apart, or if the other person is not a control person. We don't know the age of the recruit, if say he were a sophomore on an official visit, the kid could be 15, if he is 17 and she 22 he cant give consent. But how do we know it there isn't an investigation. I am not trying to blame a victim, I am just trying to figure out who the victim actually is.
Get a high price enough lawyer and the female Minny student could be considered a control person, as someone representing Minny athletic interests.

Priceless, beyond absurd at this point.... So let me see if I have this straight, the Minnesota Scholarship Football Players who "the recruit" was assigned to stay with are no longer responsible for "the recruit" being at a party in the apartment building where the implicated Football Players lived and where alcohol (and like much worse) was being consumed at 2:30 am in the morning??? It's RS's fault that "the recruit" was at the party despite RS stating unequivocally that she had no idea who these men were prior to meeting them at the party in her apartment building sometime around 2:30 am - again, had NEVER MET THEM prior to meeting them AT THE PARTY! But this makes perfect sense to you that anybody could claim she was the "control person" responsible for "the recruit" INAPPROPRIATELY being at the party in the first place despite the fact that she had no idea who he even frigging was or how he got there (let alone how old he was)!!! Oh yea, the fact that the Scholarship Football Players (and "the recruit" who they were RESPONSIBLE for hosting - including being responsible for the recruit even being at the party in the first place) acted in an intentionally duplicitous manner from the moment they met the women at the party in an effort to isolate her in A2's apartment (located in the same building on the 5th Floor) has no bearing, importance or implication of any kind on any of this??? Seriously? WTF? doesn't even begin to cover this illogical back-fitted diarrhea of the imagination!

 

[sluggo72]

Priceless, beyond absurd at this point.... So let me see if I have this straight, the Minnesota Scholarship Football Players who "the recruit" was assigned to stay with are no longer responsible for "the recruit" being at a party in the apartment building where the implicated Football Players lived and where alcohol (and like much worse) was being consumed at 2:30 am in the morning??? It's RS's fault that "the recruit" was at the party despite RS stating unequivocally that she had no idea who these men were prior to meeting them at the party in her apartment building sometime around 2:30 am - again, had NEVER MET THEM prior to meeting them AT THE PARTY! But this makes perfect sense to you that anybody could claim she was the "control person" responsible for "the recruit" INAPPROPRIATELY being at the party in the first place despite the fact that she had no idea who he even frigging was or how he got there (let alone how old he was)!!! Oh yea, the fact that the Scholarship Football Players (and "the recruit" who they were RESPONSIBLE for hosting - including being responsible for the recruit even being at the party in the first place) acted in an intentionally duplicitous manner from the moment they met the women at the party in an effort to isolate her in A2's apartment (located in the same building on the 5th Floor) has no bearing, importance or implication of any kind on any of this??? Seriously? WTF? doesn't even begin to cover this illogical back-fitted diarrhea of the imagination!

If she is 22 and he is 17 she committed a crime, whether a control person or not. As a 22 yr old it's your responsibility to know the age of your partners. Put the shoe on the other foot, a 22 yr football player has sex with a 17 yo hs cheerleader while visiting Minnesota, how do yo fell now without capitals any letters

 

[STPGopherfan]

so who is A2?

I believe A2 is a player (Djam?) I'd have to reread the report.

 

[STPGopherfan]

you mean the women is 22?? Yikes if so, there is probably more worms.

I could be wrong, but that is one report I saw. Any details about her are very unclear. I am sure they are "trying" to protect her Identity(and rightfully so btw.).

 

[sluggo72]

I could be wrong, but that is one report I saw. Any details about her are very unclear. I am sure they are "trying" to protect her Identity(and rightfully so btw.).

I think she is 22 as well somebody linked the police report and it's stated in there

 

[UncleLar]

no its not, re read that , it is 16 if the two aren't more than 4 years apart, or if the other person is not a control person. We don't know the age of the recruit, if say he were a sophomore on an official visit, the kid could be 15, if he is 17 and she 22 he cant give consent. But how do we know it there isn't an investigation. I am not trying to blame a victim, I am just trying to figure out who the victim actually is.
Get a high price enough lawyer and the female Minny student could be considered a control person, as someone representing Minny athletic interests.

If she is 22 and he is 17 she committed a crime, whether a control person or not. As a 22 yr old it's your responsibility to know the age of your partners. Put the shoe on the other foot, a 22 yr football player has sex with a 17 yo hs cheerleader while visiting Minnesota, how do yo fell now without capitals any letters

I'll ask you the same thing that I asked Franklin. Wanna bet?

Here's the law in Minnesota.

Under 13, it's statutory rape no matter what,

From 13-15, the close-in-age exclusion is in effect (you are correct in that it is 4 years). So a 13 can have sex with anyone up to 17. A 15 year old is good up to 19.

16 is the age of consent. 16 and over it doesn't matter how old the partner is.


The only thing you can hang you hat on would be if the kid was 15 (highly unlikely). The position of authority exception for 16-17 year olds that you seem to want to apply is laughable.

 

[sluggo72]

I'll ask you the same thing that I asked Franklin. Wanna bet?

Here's the law in Minnesota.

Under 13, it's statutory rape no matter what,

From 13-15, the close-in-age exclusion is in effect (you are correct in that it is 4 years). So a 13 can have sex with anyone up to 17. A 15 year old is good up to 19.

16 is the age of consent. 16 and over it doesn't matter how old the partner is.


The only thing you can hang you hat on would be if the kid was 15 (highly unlikely). The position of authority exception for 16-17 year olds that you seem to want to apply is laughable.

So it still begs the question, how old was the recruit ? Minny didn't bother to investigate that, who knows about the police. Look at Minny.s attitude relative to the recruit, heck he's not our student, he's not our problem (pg4 footnote 1)